Rhodmhire wrote:
Yourself? That would actually be an interesting hypothetical--life without free speech or no life at all.
Huh, you learn something new every day.
Rhod, its posts like this that keep me comming back for more.
Advertisement
by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 8:28 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:
Yourself? That would actually be an interesting hypothetical--life without free speech or no life at all.
Huh, you learn something new every day.
by Yenke-Bin » Fri May 28, 2010 8:34 pm
by CIB EMPIRE » Fri May 28, 2010 8:42 pm
by Yenke-Bin » Fri May 28, 2010 8:46 pm
CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 9:08 pm
Yenke-Bin wrote:I am never willing to kill anyone, especially the right of free speech. I am, however, willing to die saying what I want, when I want, where I want. There is a big difference between the two.
by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri May 28, 2010 9:15 pm
Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
by Orlkjestad » Fri May 28, 2010 9:17 pm
CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
by Dyakovo » Fri May 28, 2010 9:27 pm
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
by The Holy Cathedral » Fri May 28, 2010 9:27 pm
WWII History Geeks wrote:All of you would kill just to be able to say what you want to?
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 9:33 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
Sedition is a crime...
None of the rights in the Bill of Rights are unlimited, and them not being unlimited does not mean that they don't exist.
by Dyakovo » Fri May 28, 2010 9:36 pm
Kraishen wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
Sedition is a crime...
None of the rights in the Bill of Rights are unlimited, and them not being unlimited does not mean that they don't exist.
I'm pretty sure there's a logical falacy somewhere in there.....lol.
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 9:44 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Kraishen wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
Sedition is a crime...
None of the rights in the Bill of Rights are unlimited, and them not being unlimited does not mean that they don't exist.
I'm pretty sure there's a logical falacy somewhere in there.....lol.
Where?
Having (for example) the right to free speech does not mean you have the right to yell "Fire" in a theatre...
by Ryadn » Fri May 28, 2010 10:20 pm
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 10:21 pm
Ryadn wrote:I wouldn't kill, but I'd take a beating.
by Rhodmhire » Fri May 28, 2010 10:24 pm
by Ryadn » Fri May 28, 2010 10:24 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Fri May 28, 2010 10:26 pm
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Yenke-Bin wrote:CIB EMPIRE wrote:The amercans have no rights if you look at everything the government has passed, they only allow us these freedoms for the time being but whenever something goes wrong notice how quick the government is to "temporarily suspend our rights"
I am pretty sure you are wrong.
Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 10:26 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:
Because he was a Little batshit insane and I would never adhere to any doctrine or ideology affiliated with his ideas on any given day of the week.
See, the joke was not only because of his Anglo-American surname, but because of the serious subsequent implications.
Shit, it was funny on paper, okay? Everything is a jocular verity on paper.
by Rhodmhire » Fri May 28, 2010 10:27 pm
Ryadn wrote:No. Even if it wasn't irreparably at odds with my ethics, it's too much work. When given the option, I've declined to do things that were even kinda've work for money. I mean, I work my ass off at my job, but if someone offers me $20 to drive across town to mail a letter... odds are likely I'll choose laziness.
by Rhodmhire » Fri May 28, 2010 10:29 pm
Kraishen wrote:You just don't like the muslim ideals, because you, like most americans, asociate the muslim faith with terrorism.
by Rhodmhire » Fri May 28, 2010 10:31 pm
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:Well if the Patiot Act isn't proof enough, Look up the history of Eugene Debs, one of the great americans of the 20th century, & most people don't know who he is because he was put in prison for giving a speech.
IIRC, he was charged with sedition. Something about urging people to resist the draft. Like it or not, that's illegal.
by Fingalthorn » Fri May 28, 2010 10:32 pm
by Kraishen » Fri May 28, 2010 10:33 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:Kraishen wrote:You just don't like the muslim ideals, because you, like most americans, asociate the muslim faith with terrorism.
Bull, if it ain't my religion I do not have to adhere to its ideals. I do not affiliate myself with any religion, and therefore eh.
Also, his Muslim ideals were not what I was referring to. More so, his racial separatism and radicalism.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Nu Elysium, Pale stine, Sutalia
Advertisement