Jefferson and Madison wrote:Patridam wrote:
It's not a rule, just an observation. Look back through the thread, there a good number of people on the thread simply to assert how much all of the candidates suck.
As for you; obviously no candidate is going to wholly fit your ideology no matter what it may be (true for me too), so it often comes down to who serves as the most ameloriable compromise. I'd rather support an imperfect candidate than abstain from any support because I didn't find one exactly suited to me. If that would be too much compromise for you to support Rand the best I can suggest is Gary Johnson, but he's an unabashed hardliner and has a snowball's chance of even getting on the debates let alone a win.
Gary Johnson?
My ideal candidate would support the Libertarian Party line, except that he would also support vouchers (in the fields of health care, housing, and education) to guarantee equal market access for individuals who are employed but low income.
That puts me closer to Democrats than to someone like Rand Paul or Ted Cruz. Even though I think we should decentralize schooling and voucherize Medicaid, I still support a universal health system of sorts.
Problem is that it is not in the business of Government to dictate anything relating to Health Care, or Health Insurance.