Intercepts it on what basis?
Advertisement
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:38 am
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:39 am
Dyakovo wrote:Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
And as I pointed out, wanting to change one small piece of it doesn't meant they hate it as it is now.
Wrong.
The establishment clause isn't just a small piece of the constitution (unless your sole criteria for determining that is word count - which is a moronic standard), it being part of what makes up the concept of separation of church and state in constitutional law makes it a cornerstone of one of the founding principles of the nation.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:40 am
by Murkwood » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:43 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:43 am
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:44 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:45 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:47 am
by Murkwood » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:47 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Those 57% can go fuck themselves, then learn the constitution they so happily and blindly babble about.
Church and state.
Non-compliant.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:48 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Those 57% can go fuck themselves, then learn the constitution they so happily and blindly babble about.
Church and state.
Non-compliant.
by Ifreann » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:50 am
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Ifreann wrote:Isn't it? Have I been hearing of some other Republican Party that has, in many various ways, sought to enforce their Christian beliefs on the people of their nation?
Unless, of course, the 28th Amendment removed the Establishment Clause from the 1st Amendment and thus empowered Congress to establish a national religion.
A. The Nation is Culturally Christian.
Establishing a National Religion doesn't force people to convert to Christianity. As I said, the official religion of GB is Anglicanism, but no one is required to be Anglican.
by Libertas Liber » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:50 am
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:50 am
by Western-Ukraine » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:51 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:52 am
Western-Ukraine wrote:This is really some good news from Americas. It's great to see so many Republicans are defending the only true religion. A national religion is never troubling in any way. As long as it doesn't end up in lynching of minority religions it is all fine.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:52 am
by Murkwood » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:53 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Western-Ukraine » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:53 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N
by Tarsonis Survivors » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:55 am
Ifreann wrote:Tarsonis Survivors wrote:
A. The Nation is Culturally Christian.
No it isn't. America has a lot of Christians in it, and obviously that has influenced its culture(to the extent that so large a nation can be said to have a single culture). But so have many, many other things.Establishing a National Religion doesn't force people to convert to Christianity. As I said, the official religion of GB is Anglicanism, but no one is required to be Anglican.
It might not. Or it might. And since the Republican party is already trying to make Americans live their lives in accordance with the dictates of their Protestant God I don't see how anyone can believe that if their faith were given official recognition by the supreme law of the land that they would cease in these efforts.
by Ifreann » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:57 am
Murkwood wrote:"National Religion" is a meaningless term. It's more symbolic than anything.
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:58 am
by Dyakovo » Wed Feb 25, 2015 8:59 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:01 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Western-Ukraine » Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:02 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:04 am
Western-Ukraine wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Not my fault you hold such a stupid opinion.
And who are you to say my opinion is stupid? Is part of your liberal ideology the nonacceptance of opinions not like yours? I hate how people here are like you and just outright laugh at people with remarkably different opinions.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, DeMoNiC sAtAn, Dimetrodon Empire, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Imperial Majapahit, Jibjibistan, Kingdom of azakstan, Nyoskova, Repreteop, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Holy Therns, Urine Town, Valyxias
Advertisement