NATION

PASSWORD

Is It Correct To Be Politically Correct?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:26 am

Kaesar the invincible wrote:
Ifreann wrote:If you think before you speak, but none the less say what is on your mind regardless, then you may as well not have thought at all. And if you cannot think of a situation in which it would be to your benefit to not offend someone, then I don't believe that thinking is your strong suit.



Yes, this kind of opposition to personal responsibility is pretty typical of member of Ayn Rand's Sex Cult.

1 thinking =/= coming to the same conclusion as someone else. If I dont care how people view me then naturally I will come to a much different conclusion of what is proper and improper to say in my opinion. For instance I dont swear or at least only do so while in physical pain. I do this because I find swearing to be crass and useless. I am not impolite I am just A-polite (not an actual word but it means I dont care either way)
2 what sex cult? and how do I join? :P
In all seriousness if you read Ayn Rand you will see that she advocates responsible self interest, responsibility =/= being a submissive sheep to afraid to speak its mind

Rand advocated action. The movement towards results. If you insult everybody, they'll ignore you and you won't get anywhere. If you put your views politely, they'll be much more likely to listen and you'll be much more likely to make an objective difference.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Kaesar the invincible
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesar the invincible » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 am

Zottistan wrote:
Kaesar the invincible wrote:1 thinking =/= coming to the same conclusion as someone else. If I dont care how people view me then naturally I will come to a much different conclusion of what is proper and improper to say in my opinion. For instance I dont swear or at least only do so while in physical pain. I do this because I find swearing to be crass and useless. I am not impolite I am just A-polite (not an actual word but it means I dont care either way)
2 what sex cult? and how do I join? :P
In all seriousness if you read Ayn Rand you will see that she advocates responsible self interest, responsibility =/= being a submissive sheep to afraid to speak its mind

Rand advocated action. The movement towards results. If you insult everybody, they'll ignore you and you won't get anywhere. If you put your views politely, they'll be much more likely to listen and you'll be much more likely to make an objective difference.

I dont go out of my way to insult people though. I just say what I think, I have actually been called polite on many occasions IRL dsespite not actually trying at all to be polite. Most people tend to either love or hate me.
EDIT: Also you can be polite and honest, what I meant was if I had to choose between being polite OR being honest I would choose honest every time. I say what is on my mind, but HOW I say it is up to me and I generally tend to do so without insulting people too much
Last edited by Kaesar the invincible on Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
A is A
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist!
We are a libertarian "nation" ruled by the free market.
I am a cynical existentialist, antihuman humanist, antisocial social darwinist, realistic idealist and godlike atheist also a PROUD METALHEAD \m/
“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision.”

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zottistan » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:30 am

Kaesar the invincible wrote:
Zottistan wrote:Rand advocated action. The movement towards results. If you insult everybody, they'll ignore you and you won't get anywhere. If you put your views politely, they'll be much more likely to listen and you'll be much more likely to make an objective difference.

I dont go out of my way to insult people though. I just say what I think, I have actually been called polite on many occasions IRL dsespite not actually trying at all to be polite. Most people tend to either love or hate me.

I don't think you understand what political correctness is, so. It's not culling your opinions because other people disagree with them. It's putting them politely so as to offend as few people as possible.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Kaesar the invincible
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesar the invincible » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:32 am

Zottistan wrote:
Kaesar the invincible wrote:I dont go out of my way to insult people though. I just say what I think, I have actually been called polite on many occasions IRL dsespite not actually trying at all to be polite. Most people tend to either love or hate me.

I don't think you understand what political correctness is, so. It's not culling your opinions because other people disagree with them. It's putting them politely so as to offend as few people as possible.

That is Ok then, I thought that political correctness was lying about your views to appease people
A is A
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist!
We are a libertarian "nation" ruled by the free market.
I am a cynical existentialist, antihuman humanist, antisocial social darwinist, realistic idealist and godlike atheist also a PROUD METALHEAD \m/
“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision.”

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163942
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:34 am


An unenforceable, symbolic ban. Nothing more substantive?

I have heard it is illegal to say it in certain places in the UK, though I don't know whether this is true or not.

It's not. The Public Order Act prohibits various sorts of verbal abuse in public.

Ifreann wrote:Nonsense. Everyone who has to deal with the public as part of their job should make an effort to not offend the public they're dealing with. Otherwise they're not doing their job properly, are they?


Those words would be within his normal vocabulary, since he deals with the public.

And if the public doesn't like the words in one's normal vocabulary then one should use other words or find a new line of work that doesn't involve speaking to the public.
And I meant more about him getting in official trouble for saying "gay" or "Oriental."

It doesn't matter what the words are, if one is meant to be dealing with the public and one is pissing people off because of the words one uses, then one should find new words to use.
If it serves an advantageous point other than to not get into official trouble, then use it.

Sometimes getting in trouble is advantageous, obviously.

Ifreann wrote:PC POLICE!


I wouldn't call not using obscenities being politically correct exclusively. It's more about not being vulgar.

You've decided that certain words are bad and shouldn't be used because they offend your sensibilities.But when other people do the exact same thing with different words, that's terrible somehow. It's like people don't have the same opinion as you or something.

Ifreann wrote:Unless they're stupid, they'll use the terms that generate the least controversy, so when their speech makes the news it'll be for what it was about, not how they offended some section of the populace.


That word would then serve an advantageous point. And you might say it's to the same effect, but they're both being done for different causes. One is out of fear that he would get in trouble officially for using it. The other would be so that he may cause no problems with the public. The difference is probably insignificant to you since, you know, if fear mongering accomplished the same thing then why would it matter which one is used, right?

So if I follow, it's okay to choose to avoid some certain word to avoid the controversy the use of that word would cause, but it's bad to choose to avoid some certain word to avoid the controversy the use of that word would cause.

Ifreann wrote:Obscenities are specific words...


"Obscenities" refers to a group of specific words. The group itself is general.

And "politically incorrect" refers to a group of specific terms and phrases, the group itself is general.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163942
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:42 am

Kaesar the invincible wrote:
Ifreann wrote:If you think before you speak, but none the less say what is on your mind regardless, then you may as well not have thought at all. And if you cannot think of a situation in which it would be to your benefit to not offend someone, then I don't believe that thinking is your strong suit.



Yes, this kind of opposition to personal responsibility is pretty typical of member of Ayn Rand's Sex Cult.

1 thinking =/= coming to the same conclusion as someone else. If I dont care how people view me then naturally I will come to a much different conclusion of what is proper and improper to say in my opinion. For instance I dont swear or at least only do so while in physical pain. I do this because I find swearing to be crass and useless. I am not impolite I am just A-polite (not an actual word but it means I dont care either way)

Only a teenager could think that they could function in the real world without caring what people think of them. It matters what people think of you. What people think of you determines whether they'll give you a job, whether they'll do business with you, whether they'll rent you an apartment, whether they'll let you ride their bus, whether they'll let you into their store, et cetera, et cetera, ad infinitum.
2 what sex cult? and how do I join? :P

Familiarise yourself with the writings of eminent 20th Century Russian-American philosopher and sex kitten Ayn Rand. If you're worthy, you'll figure it out.
In all seriousness if you read Ayn Rand you will see that she advocates responsible self interest, responsibility =/= being a submissive sheep to afraid to speak its mind

Nor is responsibility spraying your verbal diarrhoea all over someone without considering how badly it could go for you if they were to take offence.

EDIT: that being said if you want to be politically correct you are welcome to do so, just dont get all annoyed when someone gives you their unfiltered undefiled opinions

You'll find that I'm every bit as free to get annoyed as I am to be politically correct. You're not the boss of me.


Kaesar the invincible wrote:
Zottistan wrote:I don't think you understand what political correctness is, so. It's not culling your opinions because other people disagree with them. It's putting them politely so as to offend as few people as possible.

That is Ok then, I thought that political correctness was lying about your views to appease people

And if you had thought before you had expressed your opinions about political correctness, maybe you would have realised that you don't know very much about it, and that you should research it a bit first. But you didn't think, or you may as well not have, and now you look very silly, and the record of that will exist more or less forever.
Last edited by Ifreann on Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ohrigstad
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Aug 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ohrigstad » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:45 am

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:These days one must be careful of what comes out of their mouths, and make an effort to be politically correct. Is it bad not to be politically correct, and vice versa? (when I say politically correct, I mean, for example, the public backlash a politician would recieved if he or she "offended someone through dialogue"). What is your opinion of political correctness? (regarding a statement by a none-bigoted individual)

I think speech codes and thought terminating cliches can be dangerous.

User avatar
Kaesar the invincible
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesar the invincible » Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:55 am

Ifreann wrote:
Kaesar the invincible wrote:1 thinking =/= coming to the same conclusion as someone else. If I dont care how people view me then naturally I will come to a much different conclusion of what is proper and improper to say in my opinion. For instance I dont swear or at least only do so while in physical pain. I do this because I find swearing to be crass and useless. I am not impolite I am just A-polite (not an actual word but it means I dont care either way)

Only a teenager could think that they could function in the real world without caring what people think of them. It matters what people think of you. What people think of you determines whether they'll give you a job, whether they'll do business with you, whether they'll let you ride their bus, whether they'll let you into your store, et cetera, et cetera, ad infinitum.
2 what sex cult? and how do I join? :P

Familiarise yourself with the writings of eminent 20th Century Russian-American philosopher and sex kitten Ayn Rand. If you're worthy, you'll figure it out.
In all seriousness if you read Ayn Rand you will see that she advocates responsible self interest, responsibility =/= being a submissive sheep to afraid to speak its mind

Nor is responsibility spraying your verbal diarrhoea all over someone without considering how badly it could go for you if they were to take offence.

EDIT: that being said if you want to be politically correct you are welcome to do so, just dont get all annoyed when someone gives you their unfiltered undefiled opinions

You'll find that I'm every bit as free to get annoyed as I am to be politically correct. You're not the boss of me.


Kaesar the invincible wrote:That is Ok then, I thought that political correctness was lying about your views to appease people

And if you had thought before you had expressed your opinions about political correctness, maybe you would have realised that you don't know very much about it, and that you should research it a bit first. But you didn't think, or you may as well not have, and now you look very silly, and the record of that will exist more or less forever.


1 Yes but as I have said before most people either love me or hate me, but there are as a whole more people who love me than those who hate me. So obviously Im doing SOMETHING right! At least in your opinion for me it doesnt matter as long as Im happy.
2 I am aware of Ayn Rands affair with one of her circle members. I dont see how that is a problem or why that somehow makes objectivism a sex cult. And if it was it wouldnt matter because sex is a private thing and what I do privately is my business.
3 in what way have I said anything really offensive? in fact you have probbably been more offensive with that "verbal diarhea" comment than I have been, except I dont really care what you think of me so I wasnt actually offended.
4 sure sure get annoyed but remember the less things in life that offend you the happier you will be :)
5 I admit I made a mistake and corrected myself. Everyone makes mistakes, The fact that I was willing to modify my views based on new information is called being rational. I understand I was wrong and moving forward I now know more than I did before. I learned something from this whole debate which far far outweighs any ridicule I may recieve for being wrong about something.
A is A
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist!
We are a libertarian "nation" ruled by the free market.
I am a cynical existentialist, antihuman humanist, antisocial social darwinist, realistic idealist and godlike atheist also a PROUD METALHEAD \m/
“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision.”

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163942
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:13 am

Kaesar the invincible wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Only a teenager could think that they could function in the real world without caring what people think of them. It matters what people think of you. What people think of you determines whether they'll give you a job, whether they'll do business with you, whether they'll let you ride their bus, whether they'll let you into your store, et cetera, et cetera, ad infinitum.

Familiarise yourself with the writings of eminent 20th Century Russian-American philosopher and sex kitten Ayn Rand. If you're worthy, you'll figure it out.

Nor is responsibility spraying your verbal diarrhoea all over someone without considering how badly it could go for you if they were to take offence.


You'll find that I'm every bit as free to get annoyed as I am to be politically correct. You're not the boss of me.



And if you had thought before you had expressed your opinions about political correctness, maybe you would have realised that you don't know very much about it, and that you should research it a bit first. But you didn't think, or you may as well not have, and now you look very silly, and the record of that will exist more or less forever.


1 Yes but as I have said before most people either love me or hate me, but there are as a whole more people who love me than those who hate me. So obviously Im doing SOMETHING right!...

Among the handful of people you know now. That could very easily change.
...3 in what way have I said anything really offensive? in fact you have probbably been more offensive with that "verbal diarhea" comment than I have been, except I dont really care what you think of me so I wasnt actually offended....

See? You've posted without thinking again. I wasn't saying that you've offended me, nor anyone else here. I was saying that offending someone might not be in your "rational self interest". So if you say you don't care about what others think of you, you do not, in fact, pursue your "rational self interest".
...5 I admit I made a mistake and corrected myself. Everyone makes mistakes, The fact that I was willing to modify my views based on new information is called being rational. I understand I was wrong and moving forward I now know more than I did before. I learned something from this whole debate which far far outweighs any ridicule I may recieve for being wrong about something.

I'm not ridiculing you. I'm offering more information for you to rationally consider. And ridiculing you a little, because it's fun.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Dread Lady Nathicana
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 26053
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dread Lady Nathicana » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:18 am

Helltank wrote:I'm just puzzled why some people think it makes a difference if I say "homosexual" when I mean "gay". It's all the same thing. Call them what you want. Abominations, freaks of nature, poofs, gay, homosexual, rainbow ponies, humpers, sodomites, they boil down to the same basic concept. It's just for some reason, if I decide to gall a gay person "freak of nature", everybody goes crazy, but "homosexual" and suddenly everyone's on my side.

Even more irritating are the race and gender PCs. We all know what you mean when you say mailman. No need for mailperson. Now, the reason why calling someone nigger is banned is understandable. But why African American Person? Why not just black man?

Perhaps your puzzlement at why people do not like being called offensive things is why you keep getting yourself into trouble. You are, as always, free to believe whatever you like - everyone here is. However on these forums, HOW you express those beliefs is what you will be called on, and held accountable for. It's the idea of having a place that, while not perfect, and not free of all offense, one can have a reasonable expectation of not being subjected to namecalling, trolling, flaming, etc.

Choose how you express your beliefs in a less inflammatory manner, or we're forced to barge in and start swinging warnings, bans, and deletions around. Which isn't really our end goal here.

Just a friendly reminder to you, Helltank, and anyone else who feels they may be struggling with this concept - don't act like a jerk, especially to your fellow posters. If you feel your next post may be somewhat jerkish in tone, think for a moment, and edit prior to posting. If you're posting with the deliberate intent of irritating another poster, stop, and go do something else until you can manage to avoid that little temptation. If you aren't sure - err on the side of caution. Most people using this site manage to pull this off on a regular basis, day in, and day out. It can be managed.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:20 am

Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:
Helltank wrote:I'm just puzzled why some people think it makes a difference if I say "homosexual" when I mean "gay". It's all the same thing. Call them what you want. Abominations, freaks of nature, poofs, gay, homosexual, rainbow ponies, humpers, sodomites, they boil down to the same basic concept. It's just for some reason, if I decide to gall a gay person "freak of nature", everybody goes crazy, but "homosexual" and suddenly everyone's on my side.

Even more irritating are the race and gender PCs. We all know what you mean when you say mailman. No need for mailperson. Now, the reason why calling someone nigger is banned is understandable. But why African American Person? Why not just black man?

Perhaps your puzzlement at why people do not like being called offensive things is why you keep getting yourself into trouble. You are, as always, free to believe whatever you like - everyone here is. However on these forums, HOW you express those beliefs is what you will be called on, and held accountable for. It's the idea of having a place that, while not perfect, and not free of all offense, one can have a reasonable expectation of not being subjected to namecalling, trolling, flaming, etc.

Choose how you express your beliefs in a less inflammatory manner, or we're forced to barge in and start swinging warnings, bans, and deletions around. Which isn't really our end goal here.

Just a friendly reminder to you, Helltank, and anyone else who feels they may be struggling with this concept - don't act like a jerk, especially to your fellow posters. If you feel your next post may be somewhat jerkish in tone, think for a moment, and edit prior to posting. If you're posting with the deliberate intent of irritating another poster, stop, and go do something else until you can manage to avoid that little temptation. If you aren't sure - err on the side of caution. Most people using this site manage to pull this off on a regular basis, day in, and day out. It can be managed.

Oh no! The PC Police have struck!!!! ;)
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Kaesar the invincible
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 398
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesar the invincible » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:25 am

Ifreann wrote:
Kaesar the invincible wrote:
1 Yes but as I have said before most people either love me or hate me, but there are as a whole more people who love me than those who hate me. So obviously Im doing SOMETHING right!...

Among the handful of people you know now. That could very easily change.
...3 in what way have I said anything really offensive? in fact you have probbably been more offensive with that "verbal diarhea" comment than I have been, except I dont really care what you think of me so I wasnt actually offended....

See? You've posted without thinking again. I wasn't saying that you've offended me, nor anyone else here. I was saying that offending someone might not be in your "rational self interest". So if you say you don't care about what others think of you, you do not, in fact, pursue your "rational self interest".
...5 I admit I made a mistake and corrected myself. Everyone makes mistakes, The fact that I was willing to modify my views based on new information is called being rational. I understand I was wrong and moving forward I now know more than I did before. I learned something from this whole debate which far far outweighs any ridicule I may recieve for being wrong about something.

I'm not ridiculing you. I'm offering more information for you to rationally consider. And ridiculing you a little, because it's fun.

1 I know quite a few people but I can see what you mean by that.
2 Agreed, however there is a difference between valuing how people see you indirectly (reputation) and valuing it directly (validtion seeking) I indirectly assume that by being polite I will probbably get people to take me more seriously but I dont actually seek their validation or care about what they think of me as long as it doesnt affect how they act towards me n a negative way.
3 I like your style :lol:
A is A
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist!
We are a libertarian "nation" ruled by the free market.
I am a cynical existentialist, antihuman humanist, antisocial social darwinist, realistic idealist and godlike atheist also a PROUD METALHEAD \m/
“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision.”

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:49 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Coccygia wrote:I detest political correctness. I detest it all the more because I often agree with its stated aims, which IMFAO it only undermines.


Oddly enough, I lived near a neighborhood with a large ethnic Jamaican population.

Me and the young black kids would get all awkward and offended when the old black people would laugh their asses off about who was working the cotton fields.

14 years later, me and Malc got the joke and nobody else did.

I don't get it either, nor what this has to do with my post.
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Galborg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Aug 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galborg » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:17 pm

Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"
The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is you can never be sure if they are real. - Mark Twain

User avatar
Meryuma
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14922
Founded: Jul 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meryuma » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:42 pm

"Political correctness" in the sense of being pseudo-progressive and moralistic is annoying. "Political correctness" in the sense of not being a dick to minorities is pretty much an imperative.

Union Of Canadorian Socialists Republic wrote:One can support homosexuality, but will be protested if their against it, etc...


How is that in any way a double standard?

Herskerstad wrote:If for about a century and a half in the US, whites would be natural slaves to African Americans, and would find themselves lynched in trees with crowds cheering. 'Goodbye White trash' Then sure, I would see them as equally offensive. Now, white trash certainly has a racist undertone, but mostly related to the trailer trash culture, whereas the word nigger, is one that has so much historical weight behind it and implications that the two words will never be the same as far as the weight of it goes. However, that being said, a significant part of modern African American culture sure has debased it's original implications and that has not done them any favors


"White trash" is at least as much about class as race.
ᛋᛃᚢ - Social Justice Úlfheðinn
Potarius wrote:
Neo Arcad wrote:Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass.


In layman's terms, orgy time.


Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.


Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."


Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.



Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.

Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...

*puts on sunglasses*

blow out of proportions."

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

...so here's your future

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:30 am

Politically Correct is a term made up by people who want to be rude so that they can claim they are being oppressed because they can't be rude.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:17 am

Galborg wrote:Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"


Saying $9.99 isn't a PC thing, it's a business thing. It's perceived value - people are simply more likely to buy something that costs $9.99 than something that costs $10, even.

As for people using 'literally' when they mean 'metaphorically' (or 'implied' when they mean 'inferred', etc)... I'm not convinced that's a 'pc' thing, at all.

Indeed, I'm beginning to doubt the 'PC police' are even a real, recognised law-enforcement organisation.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The Silence of Night
Diplomat
 
Posts: 730
Founded: Apr 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Silence of Night » Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:34 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Galborg wrote:Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"


Saying $9.99 isn't a PC thing, it's a business thing. It's perceived value - people are simply more likely to buy something that costs $9.99 than something that costs $10, even.

As for people using 'literally' when they mean 'metaphorically' (or 'implied' when they mean 'inferred', etc)... I'm not convinced that's a 'pc' thing, at all.

Indeed, I'm beginning to doubt the 'PC police' are even a real, recognised law-enforcement organisation.

I wouldn't say that. They're always watching.
Progressivism 100
Socialism 56.25
Tenderness 50


Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible realistic egalitarian with several strong convictions.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:51 am

Galborg wrote:Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".1

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"2

1: Ummm... Things being priced at $9.99 instead of $10 has absolutely nothing at all to do with political correctness. It is a marketing ploy.
2: Once again, has nothing to do with political correctness... This time, however, it is a matter of linguistic accuracy... Do you even know what "literally" means?
Oxford Dictionary wrote:literally
Pronunciation: /ˈlɪt(ə)rəli/
Translate literally | into French | into German | into Italian | into Spanish
adverb
in a literal manner or sense; exactly
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Aug 22, 2013 8:53 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Galborg wrote:Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".1

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"2

1: Ummm... Things being priced at $9.99 instead of $10 has absolutely nothing at all to do with political correctness. It is a marketing ploy.
2: Once again, has nothing to do with political correctness... This time, however, it is a matter of linguistic accuracy... Do you even know what "literally" means?
Oxford Dictionary wrote:literally
Pronunciation: /ˈlɪt(ə)rəli/
Translate literally | into French | into German | into Italian | into Spanish
adverb
in a literal manner or sense; exactly


I literally explode with rage, every time I have to explain that.

*nods*
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Cashewbutter
Envoy
 
Posts: 217
Founded: Apr 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Cashewbutter » Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:22 am

The "PC" label gets misused both ways to shut down conversations. Some people argue against real objections to blatantly offensive wording by claiming the other person is just trying to force political correctness down their throat. And some people do resort to "OMG, that's offensive" when faced with an argument they're losing as a way to derail the discussion and move it towards something less logic-based and easier to win just by shouting louder. I've seen both situations occur many times, offline and online.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38272
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:24 am

Cashewbutter wrote:The "PC" label gets misused both ways to shut down conversations. Some people argue against real objections to blatantly offensive wording by claiming the other person is just trying to force political correctness down their throat. And some people do resort to "OMG, that's offensive" when faced with an argument they're losing as a way to derail the discussion and move it towards something less logic-based and easier to win just by shouting louder. I've seen both situations occur many times, offline and online.


... Has that happened on NSG?

That would be a short way to not be liked on this forum.
THOSE THAT SOW THORNS SHOULD NOT EXPECT FLOWERS
CONSERVATISM IS FEAR AND STAGNATION AS IDEOLOGY. ONLY MARCH FORWARD.

Pronouns: She/Her
The Alt-Right Playbook
Alt-right/racist terminology
LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:30 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Perhaps your puzzlement at why people do not like being called offensive things is why you keep getting yourself into trouble. You are, as always, free to believe whatever you like - everyone here is. However on these forums, HOW you express those beliefs is what you will be called on, and held accountable for. It's the idea of having a place that, while not perfect, and not free of all offense, one can have a reasonable expectation of not being subjected to namecalling, trolling, flaming, etc.

Choose how you express your beliefs in a less inflammatory manner, or we're forced to barge in and start swinging warnings, bans, and deletions around. Which isn't really our end goal here.

Just a friendly reminder to you, Helltank, and anyone else who feels they may be struggling with this concept - don't act like a jerk, especially to your fellow posters. If you feel your next post may be somewhat jerkish in tone, think for a moment, and edit prior to posting. If you're posting with the deliberate intent of irritating another poster, stop, and go do something else until you can manage to avoid that little temptation. If you aren't sure - err on the side of caution. Most people using this site manage to pull this off on a regular basis, day in, and day out. It can be managed.

Oh no! The PC Police have struck!!!! ;)

But...but...but...we totally don't need PC Police, y'all!
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Galborg
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Aug 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Galborg » Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:04 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Galborg wrote:Fair enough, banning "nigger" makes sense.

But what is so offensive about "$10"? PC police insist we must say "$9.99".

What is so offensive about "literally"? PC police insist it must mean "metaphorically"


Saying $9.99 isn't a PC thing, it's a business thing. It's perceived value - people are simply more likely to buy something that costs $9.99 than something that costs $10, even.

As for people using 'literally' when they mean 'metaphorically' (or 'implied' when they mean 'inferred', etc)... I'm not convinced that's a 'pc' thing, at all.

Indeed, I'm beginning to doubt the 'PC police' are even a real, recognised law-enforcement organisation.


No true Scotsman.

I assert that all PC police are literally in the same organization.

You assert that the Political correctness Police are fucking splitters.
Smoking Ban Police hate $9.99 Police who hate Literally Police who hate Winterval Police who hate Seatbelt Police.

Let's get them to fight each other.
Last edited by Galborg on Thu Aug 22, 2013 6:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The trouble with quotes on the Internet, is you can never be sure if they are real. - Mark Twain

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Awqnia, Bovad, Emotional Support Crocodile, Kostane, M-x B-rry, New Heldervinia, Plan Neonie, The Archregimancy, Trump Almighty, Tungstan, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads