Llamalandia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
No, you're creating a fabricated version that you're pretending relates to something that's being discussed.
What you've done, indeed - in creating this alternate version to fight - is pretty much the book definition of a strawman logical fallacy.
You're going to have to link to a specific event, because I just can't address this kind of rambling nebulous claim.
Which specific event - link, please - was portrayed a racism, but wasn't racism, because of 'pc?
I admit offhand I can't find a good link to back this up. But let me offer instead that he talked about food stamps on another show and since then al sharp ton specifically has taken him to task for being racist. Yet, my understanding is in the story bill O never mentioned race at all, all he talked about was poor people and food stamps. But no we all know talking about the poor and food stamps is somehow code for saying yeah those worthless black people. So what should orally refrain from discussing food stamps because sharp ton perceives it as a racial slight? i mean that would be the pc thing to do, in fact you're not even supposed to call food stamps food stamps because we don't want to stigmatize anyone, we have to call it SNAP now, don't want anyone to get their feelings hurt now do we?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/oreilly-defends-against-charges-of-racism-by-telling-surprising-story-about-al-sharpton/
I thought it was called SNAP now because it's a supplemental nutrition assistance program (so SNAP is the acronym) and they no longer use stamps?