NATION

PASSWORD

What do you think of same-sex church wedding ceremonies?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:30 pm

Desperauex wrote:
Vazdania wrote:This^

I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Desperauex
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperauex » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:31 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

I meant why is it Taboo to talk about. You can't walk outside and say "PENISES AND VAGINAS" without being looked upon as a perv.
Last edited by Ron Swanson. On June 7, 2013. It has been edited 0 times in total


Frisivisia wrote:I'd like to euthanize everyone who advocates euthanasia.

New Rogernomics, on the Craig Cobbs wrote:Send gay porn anonymously to his mail box, using made up names and return addresses. That should be fun.

Vetalia, on NSA Tracking wrote:Nah, they stop monitoring regular communications at 5pm, pretty much everything after that involves combing the data for the best porn links.

Industrien wrote:Because screw science, my 3000 year old book is always right.
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Welcome to the back of my van, we have beer and weed.

DEFCON: 3
Wiki
I'm 88% Libertarian

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:32 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
Luveria wrote:I'm well aware churches are businesses. I'd like them to see them taxed as such instead of being in the non-profit category. They'd still survive just fine paying taxes.

Not many of them. Start taxing churches and the small ones will go broke. Pretty soon all we'd have left was mega-churches, which would suck IMO.


That makes no sense. Small churches could survive being taxed, just as other small businesses do.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
Pacifornia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1255
Founded: Jul 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pacifornia » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:33 pm

Both in Pacifornia and in my own life, I fully support same sex marriage. They can always get a secular marriage with all the trimmings :)
Check out our nation's website! http://bam2011.wix.com/pacifornia
IRL: Male, straight, atheist, socialist, Californian, Honduran-American, third year college student

"I know a lot of people think L.A. and they see a picture in their head, but those people obviously don't know me, because I sit on a couch every day. That's my idea of a good time - just being in a sweat suit."-Hayley Williams, Paramore
Questions? Comments? Concerns? Flames? Take a number and have a seat. Have a nice day :)

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:34 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty.

Fixed.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4777
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:34 pm

4years wrote:
The North Polish Union wrote:Not many of them. Start taxing churches and the small ones will go broke. Pretty soon all we'd have left was mega-churches, which would suck IMO.


That makes no sense. Small churches could survive being taxed, just as other small businesses do.

Apparently you didn't bother to read my explanation of why they would go broke.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:35 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Why?

Because churches rely almost entirely on offerings given by attenders of the church. Some small churches where I live (Nebraska) have fewer than 20-30 attenders on any given Sunday. Not all attenders will necessarily be willing or able to give money. Eventually, if taxed by the government, these churches will not be able to pay their staff (pastor(s)/priest(s), custodians, musicians, etc.) and will (1) have to disband, or (2) have to rely on volunteers to clean the church, plan and play music on Sunday, and other things. Also, being a pastor or priest is generally a full-time job, and many pastors (but hopefully not preists :p ) have families to take care of. If a church is no longer able to pay their pastors, the pastor will have to try to get a job somewhere else, thus forcing the church to disband. Not to mention that many pastors of small churches make barely enough to support their families anyway.


Because mom and pop grocery stores are taxed for the same amount as huge chains?
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
Druidville
Diplomat
 
Posts: 753
Founded: Nov 25, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Druidville » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:35 pm

Will Muslim churches be doing this too? Last I heard they were still killing their gay communities.
CAVUTO: Well, his approval and America`s regard has gone up in those (Muslim) countries. He says and they say-

KOCH: Isn`t that nice? Did they stop trying to kill us?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164089
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:37 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Sex isn't dirty so long as you shower regularly, do it somewhere clean, and don't work up too much of a sweat.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4777
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:38 pm

4years wrote:
The North Polish Union wrote:Because churches rely almost entirely on offerings given by attenders of the church. Some small churches where I live (Nebraska) have fewer than 20-30 attenders on any given Sunday. Not all attenders will necessarily be willing or able to give money. Eventually, if taxed by the government, these churches will not be able to pay their staff (pastor(s)/priest(s), custodians, musicians, etc.) and will (1) have to disband, or (2) have to rely on volunteers to clean the church, plan and play music on Sunday, and other things. Also, being a pastor or priest is generally a full-time job, and many pastors (but hopefully not preists :p ) have families to take care of. If a church is no longer able to pay their pastors, the pastor will have to try to get a job somewhere else, thus forcing the church to disband. Not to mention that many pastors of small churches make barely enough to support their families anyway.


Because mom and pop grocery stores are taxed for the same amount as huge chains?

In a grocery store you must pay for what you buy, in churches it's completely optional.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:38 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
4years wrote:
That makes no sense. Small churches could survive being taxed, just as other small businesses do.

Apparently you didn't bother to read my explanation of why they would go broke.


Apparently you don't realize that different rates of taxes are paid by the poor and the mega-rich, because without that failure your explanation makes no sense. A percentage of the total income collected by the church as profit would be paid to the government, not some set amount of money; e.i. taxation is based an earnings and projected, earnings not "pay x amount or else."
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4777
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:38 pm

Druidville wrote:Muslim churches

:palm:
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
Desperauex
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperauex » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:41 pm

Druidville wrote:Will Muslim churches be doing this too? Last I heard they were still killing their gay communities.

*Mosque
Ifreann wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Sex isn't dirty so long as you shower regularly, do it somewhere clean, and don't work up too much of a sweat.

Not sure whether to facepalm or laugh.
Last edited by Ron Swanson. On June 7, 2013. It has been edited 0 times in total


Frisivisia wrote:I'd like to euthanize everyone who advocates euthanasia.

New Rogernomics, on the Craig Cobbs wrote:Send gay porn anonymously to his mail box, using made up names and return addresses. That should be fun.

Vetalia, on NSA Tracking wrote:Nah, they stop monitoring regular communications at 5pm, pretty much everything after that involves combing the data for the best porn links.

Industrien wrote:Because screw science, my 3000 year old book is always right.
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Welcome to the back of my van, we have beer and weed.

DEFCON: 3
Wiki
I'm 88% Libertarian

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:41 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
4years wrote:
Because mom and pop grocery stores are taxed for the same amount as huge chains?

In a grocery store you must pay for what you buy, in churches it's completely optional.


Because people have to buy from that specific grocery store? I mean really, if non-one donated to the church in question it would report an income of zero and be taxed a grand total of zero dollars based on zero income. Once again, taxation is based on income/profit actually taken in, not on paying an arbitrary amount of money. Further, churches sell VDS, videotapes, books, etc. which people *gasp* have to pay for to receive.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
Dermastina
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 196
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Dermastina » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:41 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Ya know, people these days always seem to confuse morality and law. This idea comes from a law, specifically one from an ancient tribe well over 2000 years ago. It was a practical law, to help keep women who were raped before marriage from simply ending up dead (since no man would have married a woman who'd had sex before marriage).

It was never a matter of morality until people started the trend of reading little bits of the Bible out of context, and going with it. Would you consider today's laws moral rules? If not, then why do you for horribly outdated and irrelevant laws? And if yes, then what do you do if the two sets of laws contradict?

So then I hear "ah, but these rules were stated by God. That is why they are moral". And well yes, they were. However, if you understand the reason behind the laws creation, then your argument no longer stands. God created us as rational beings capable of our own logic. If the reason behind a law is no longer relevant, then neither is the law. That is how laws work, they have reasons behind them, often moral. Once that reason is gone, then so is any moral aspect of the law, and it is simply an empty law.
Last edited by Dermastina on Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Pro: Good things
Anti: Bad things

I'm English. For those that don't know what this means, this is a disclaimer that if I'm being rude, obnoxious, uncomparatively stupid, or hugely radical, it's very likely that I'm being cynical, ironic, exaggerative, or simply mocking you.

As for my actual views, I'm pro-liberty, anti-democracy, and unsure so far as economic freedoms are concerned. I have reasons for each of these, none of which I shall go into here.

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:44 pm

Druidville wrote:Will Muslim churches Mosques be doing this too? Last I heard they were still against homosexuality but hardly more violent than any of the other religions that also take that position killing their gay communities.

Fixed.

Now, going what?
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:44 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Why?

Because churches rely almost entirely on offerings given by attenders of the church. Some small churches where I live (Nebraska) have fewer than 20-30 attenders on any given Sunday. Not all attenders will necessarily be willing or able to give money. Eventually, if taxed by the government, these churches will not be able to pay their staff (pastor(s)/priest(s), custodians, musicians, etc.) and will (1) have to disband, or (2) have to rely on volunteers to clean the church, plan and play music on Sunday, and other things. Also, being a pastor or priest is generally a full-time job, and many pastors (but hopefully not preists :p ) have families to take care of. If a church is no longer able to pay their pastors, the pastor will have to try to get a job somewhere else, thus forcing the church to disband. Not to mention that many pastors of small churches make barely enough to support their families anyway.


If they are taxed on their 'income' (by which I think we can assume a combination of sales and donations, minus the flat costs and charitable contributions)... their tax burden would just be a proportion of their profit, wouldn't it?

Are you suggesting they'd be taxed more than they earn? I'm curious where you're deriving your tax model from.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Desperauex
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperauex » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:45 pm

Dermastina wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Ya know, people these days always seem to confuse morality and law. This idea comes from a law, specifically one from an ancient tribe well over 2000 years ago. It was a practical law, to help keep women who were raped before marriage from simply ending up dead (since no man would have married a woman who'd had sex before marriage).

It was never a matter of morality until people started the trend of reading little bits of the Bible out of context, and going with it. Would you consider today's laws moral rules? If not, then why do you for horribly outdated and irrelevant laws? And if yes, then what do you do if the two sets of laws contradict?

So then I hear "ah, but these rules were stated by God. That is why they are moral". And well yes, they were. However, if you understand the reason behind the laws creation, then your argument no longer stands. God created us as rational beings capable of our own logic. If the reason behind a law is no longer relevant, then neither is the law. That is how laws work, they have reasons behind them, often moral. Once that reason is gone, then so is any moral aspect of the law, and it is simply an empty law.

Found the theist
Last edited by Ron Swanson. On June 7, 2013. It has been edited 0 times in total


Frisivisia wrote:I'd like to euthanize everyone who advocates euthanasia.

New Rogernomics, on the Craig Cobbs wrote:Send gay porn anonymously to his mail box, using made up names and return addresses. That should be fun.

Vetalia, on NSA Tracking wrote:Nah, they stop monitoring regular communications at 5pm, pretty much everything after that involves combing the data for the best porn links.

Industrien wrote:Because screw science, my 3000 year old book is always right.
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Welcome to the back of my van, we have beer and weed.

DEFCON: 3
Wiki
I'm 88% Libertarian

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:45 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Of course sex is dirty, it's also sweaty, exhausting, and oh so fun marriage or not.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:45 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.


It can be, if you want it to.

*nods*
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Desperauex
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperauex » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:47 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Of course sex is dirty, it's also sweaty, exhausting, and oh so fun marriage or not.

By dirty I mean taboo. Like if you go outside, and scream "I JUST PENETRATED A WOMANS VAGINA MOTHERF*CKERS!" He'd be branded a pervert. Why is sex so well...perverted?
Last edited by Ron Swanson. On June 7, 2013. It has been edited 0 times in total


Frisivisia wrote:I'd like to euthanize everyone who advocates euthanasia.

New Rogernomics, on the Craig Cobbs wrote:Send gay porn anonymously to his mail box, using made up names and return addresses. That should be fun.

Vetalia, on NSA Tracking wrote:Nah, they stop monitoring regular communications at 5pm, pretty much everything after that involves combing the data for the best porn links.

Industrien wrote:Because screw science, my 3000 year old book is always right.
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Welcome to the back of my van, we have beer and weed.

DEFCON: 3
Wiki
I'm 88% Libertarian

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:50 pm

Desperauex wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Of course sex is dirty, it's also sweaty, exhausting, and oh so fun marriage or not.

By dirty I mean taboo. Like if you go outside, and scream "I JUST PENETRATED A WOMANS VAGINA MOTHERF*CKERS!" He'd be branded a pervert. Why is sex so well...perverted?

It's kind of a requirement. And why is perversion a bad thing? If it harms noone and everyone's ok with it then how's it bad?

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:52 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Desperauex wrote:I don't get why sex is a dirty thing. I mean, it's the reproduction of life.

Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Fixed that for you. Also, are you incapable of spelling "performed" correctly?
There is nothing "dirty" about sex.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Desperauex
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperauex » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:54 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Sex isn't dirty, so long as its preformed within marriage.

Fixed that for you. Also, are you incapable of spelling "performed" correctly?
There is nothing "dirty" about sex.

Alright go around some town, saying "Yaaaaaaaaay, no more virginity." and see if you get some looks.
Last edited by Ron Swanson. On June 7, 2013. It has been edited 0 times in total


Frisivisia wrote:I'd like to euthanize everyone who advocates euthanasia.

New Rogernomics, on the Craig Cobbs wrote:Send gay porn anonymously to his mail box, using made up names and return addresses. That should be fun.

Vetalia, on NSA Tracking wrote:Nah, they stop monitoring regular communications at 5pm, pretty much everything after that involves combing the data for the best porn links.

Industrien wrote:Because screw science, my 3000 year old book is always right.
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Welcome to the back of my van, we have beer and weed.

DEFCON: 3
Wiki
I'm 88% Libertarian

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:55 pm

Desperauex wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Fixed that for you. Also, are you incapable of spelling "performed" correctly?
There is nothing "dirty" about sex.

Alright go around some town, saying "Yaaaaaaaaay, no more virginity." and see if you get some looks.

Of course I'd get looks, that doesn't make sex somehow wrong.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Emotional Support Crocodile, Floofybit, Galactic Powers, Galicia-Asturias, Hurdergaryp, Matamorosia, Nu Elysium, Solstice Isle, Tungstan, Uiiop, Xind, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads