by Wallenburg » Wed May 06, 2015 12:32 pm
by Lleu llaw Gyffes » Wed May 06, 2015 4:35 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Wed May 06, 2015 4:46 pm
by Wisconsin9 » Wed May 06, 2015 4:49 pm
by Die Volkstaat » Wed May 06, 2015 4:56 pm
Merizoc wrote:Women shouldn't be included in the draft. Gay people shouldn't be included in the draft. Blacks shouldn't be included in the draft. Nobody should be included in the draft.
by MERIZoC » Wed May 06, 2015 4:59 pm
Die Volkstaat wrote:Merizoc wrote:Women shouldn't be included in the draft. Gay people shouldn't be included in the draft. Blacks shouldn't be included in the draft. Nobody should be included in the draft.
Well, you just missed the entire point of this thread. The question is really "if a draft exists, should women be drafted as well." My answer is yes, women are perfectly capable in defending a country, as are gays, etc. Now, while I'm against the draft, some countries should keep the draft. Take Israel, for example. They're faced with the threats of rockets and bombs daily, they need conscription, the whole country is a bloody fortress. Their draft is for the best. Estonia also needs to keep their draft, what with Russia being right next door like a bear that just wants to be poked.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed May 06, 2015 5:00 pm
Merizoc wrote:Women shouldn't be included in the draft. Gay people shouldn't be included in the draft. Blacks shouldn't be included in the draft. Nobody should be included in the draft.
by Atomic Utopia » Wed May 06, 2015 5:00 pm
by Errades » Wed May 06, 2015 5:02 pm
Die Volkstaat wrote:Estonia also needs to keep their draft, what with Russia being right next door like a bear that just wants to be poked.
by Independent State AF » Wed May 06, 2015 5:04 pm
by Pandeeria » Wed May 06, 2015 5:04 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Greater Nevadian Empire » Wed May 06, 2015 5:07 pm
Pandeeria wrote:As far as the US is concerned, the draft should be abolished.
by MERIZoC » Wed May 06, 2015 5:10 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Merizoc wrote:Women shouldn't be included in the draft. Gay people shouldn't be included in the draft. Blacks shouldn't be included in the draft. Nobody should be included in the draft.
Would you support a law demanding that any draft which is instituted be non-discriminatory and include women as well as men?
Even if the current draft were repealed?
(So like, the law repealing the draft would include a "And if it is re-instated, it must-" clause?)
by Die Volkstaat » Wed May 06, 2015 5:10 pm
Merizoc wrote:Die Volkstaat wrote:
Well, you just missed the entire point of this thread. The question is really "if a draft exists, should women be drafted as well." My answer is yes, women are perfectly capable in defending a country, as are gays, etc. Now, while I'm against the draft, some countries should keep the draft. Take Israel, for example. They're faced with the threats of rockets and bombs daily, they need conscription, the whole country is a bloody fortress. Their draft is for the best. Estonia also needs to keep their draft, what with Russia being right next door like a bear that just wants to be poked.
Clearly you missed the poll.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed May 06, 2015 5:13 pm
Merizoc wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Would you support a law demanding that any draft which is instituted be non-discriminatory and include women as well as men?
Even if the current draft were repealed?
(So like, the law repealing the draft would include a "And if it is re-instated, it must-" clause?)
Not really. Because even if we don't get rid of it, the less people we can draft, the less damage it can cause. I say make it as discriminatory as possible. Only people who hold a federal elected office can be drafted. There we go. That sounds nice.
by MERIZoC » Wed May 06, 2015 5:18 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Merizoc wrote:Not really. Because even if we don't get rid of it, the less people we can draft, the less damage it can cause. I say make it as discriminatory as possible. Only people who hold a federal elected office can be drafted. There we go. That sounds nice.
I'd see it as, the more people capable of being drafted, the less likely the public is going to support a draft.
Currently, the majority of voters can choose to conscript the minority against their will. That seems to be fairly oppressive.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed May 06, 2015 5:27 pm
Merizoc wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'd see it as, the more people capable of being drafted, the less likely the public is going to support a draft.
Currently, the majority of voters can choose to conscript the minority against their will. That seems to be fairly oppressive.
Hm, fair point, that, though public support for it is hardly anywhere near high.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/28642/vast-majority-americans-opposed-reinstituting-military-draft.aspx
by Scomagia » Wed May 06, 2015 5:34 pm
Independent State AF wrote:Damn right they should have to sign up for SS
Equal Rights, Equal Responsibility.
by Willamette Valley » Wed May 06, 2015 5:36 pm
by Big Jim P » Wed May 06, 2015 5:37 pm
Merizoc wrote:Women shouldn't be included in the draft. Gay people shouldn't be included in the draft. Blacks shouldn't be included in the draft. Nobody should be included in the draft.
by Dyakovo » Wed May 06, 2015 5:37 pm
Wallenburg wrote:I was searching up if I could register to vote in 2016 (my 18th birthday is awfully close to election day) when I thought of how I would have to register in the Selective Service System. I then ran across this:
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=41660
Why does the military only draft men? Do you agree with this decision (or as the article notes, a lack thereof) to exclude women from the draft? Why?
I think that this is an egregious case of sexual inequality. Whether you believe this stacked against men (risking their lives while women stay at home) or in favor of men (greater opportunity to fight for your nation, which I think is a strange argument), the sexes are being treated unequally and this has to stop.
by Russels Orbiting Teapot » Wed May 06, 2015 5:38 pm
Willamette Valley wrote:Sure, but the draft is never going to be activated realistically. A conflict of the scale necessitating it would almost certainly involve nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dino Charge, Philjia, SimoTETnia, Singaporen Empire, Turenia
Advertisement