by Ragnarokee » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:11 am
Bunkeranlage wrote:They're hardcore anarchic capitalists
by Common Territories » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:21 am
by Ragnarokee » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:23 am
Common Territories wrote:This the wrong area to discuss this rule.
But to answer your question: Max banned the flag (under most cases) because it is a common symbol of hatred. It symbolizes the crimes done under it by Nazi Germany and can be identified by anyone as a symbol of hatred. You can argue that it isn't, which officially the swastika isn't. But one country decided to ruin that by making it a symbol of hatred. And that is why it is banned here on NS by Max.
Bunkeranlage wrote:They're hardcore anarchic capitalists
by Imperializt Russia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:52 am
Ragnarokee wrote:Common Territories wrote:This the wrong area to discuss this rule.
But to answer your question: Max banned the flag (under most cases) because it is a common symbol of hatred. It symbolizes the crimes done under it by Nazi Germany and can be identified by anyone as a symbol of hatred. You can argue that it isn't, which officially the swastika isn't. But one country decided to ruin that by making it a symbol of hatred. And that is why it is banned here on NS by Max.
Under most cases? And sorry about it being in the wrong thread.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Ragnarokee » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:56 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Ragnarokee wrote:
Under most cases? And sorry about it being in the wrong thread.
Well, swastikas in flags are banned under all circumstances, actually.
There is no way around it, even using the non-Nazi-affiliated swastikas (I prefer using the term "the Hakenkreuz" with capital, to make it very obvious I'm talking about "that swastika"). I thought that used to be allowed, but either I was wrong or it was closed as a pro-Nazi loophole.
Bunkeranlage wrote:They're hardcore anarchic capitalists
by Gigaverse » Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:58 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Ragnarokee wrote:
Under most cases? And sorry about it being in the wrong thread.
Well, swastikas in flags are banned under all circumstances, actually.
There is no way around it, even using the non-Nazi-affiliated swastikas (I prefer using the term "the Hakenkreuz" with capital, to make it very obvious I'm talking about "that swastika"). I thought that used to be allowed, but either I was wrong or it was closed as a pro-Nazi loophole.
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student inlinguistics???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)
by Balshvik » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:02 am
Ragnarokee wrote:You can name your nation/region Nazi blah blah blah. E.g. American Nazi Party, FascistNazis, Antarctic Space Nazis. So why are you not allowed Swastikas?
I'm not pro Nazi, I was just curious.
by Germany and Prussia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:05 am
by Balshvik » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:07 am
Germany and Prussia wrote:I think we need to take back the Swastika and return it to it`s originally use to what it was before the Nazis took it and ruined it.
by Bunkeranlage » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:08 am
Balshvik wrote:Ragnarokee wrote:You can name your nation/region Nazi blah blah blah. E.g. American Nazi Party, FascistNazis, Antarctic Space Nazis. So why are you not allowed Swastikas?
I'm not pro Nazi, I was just curious.
Because no one wants to see the Nazi shit. I doubt people want to go on game after they come home from school or work to relax and see a Nazi symbol. Nazism is a disgrace to humanity. The symbol "Swastika" is forver a symbol of pure evil.
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views
by Kuki-Airani » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:09 am
by Bosakia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:15 am
by Andzhalswoodosia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:16 am
by Ragnarokee » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:17 am
Bosakia wrote:And how do we allow the hammer and sickle? It's a symbol of tyranny and the communists killed more people than the capitalists!
Kuki-Airani wrote:No Nazi symbols but this is okay; viewtopic.php?f=20&t=312555&start=150
Bunkeranlage wrote:They're hardcore anarchic capitalists
by Maltropia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:18 am
Ragnarokee wrote:I was going to upload a nazi communist flag onto my communist/0 political freedoms/civil rights etc etc nation - thanks for clearing it up. Would've got banned.
by Bunkeranlage » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:20 am
Ragnarokee wrote:Bosakia wrote:And how do we allow the hammer and sickle? It's a symbol of tyranny and the communists killed more people than the capitalists!
EXACTLY! This is why I made this thread (even though it's in the wrong place) the hammer and sickle are allowed, as are pro nazi nations/regions but the actual symbol its self is banned?
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views
by Bosakia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:21 am
Bunkeranlage wrote:Ragnarokee wrote:
EXACTLY! This is why I made this thread (even though it's in the wrong place) the hammer and sickle are allowed, as are pro nazi nations/regions but the actual symbol its self is banned?
The difference is that when people see swastikas, the first thing they think of is Adolf Hitler, the Holocaust, WWII, etc. Its negative meaning is more pervasive than its positive meanings.
The hammer and sickle is different in that when people see it, the first thing they would think of probably not be Holodomor or gulags. The Soviet crimes are not as well known as the Nazi war crimes.
by Bunkeranlage » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:23 am
Bosakia wrote:Bunkeranlage wrote:
The difference is that when people see swastikas, the first thing they think of is Adolf Hitler, the Holocaust, WWII, etc. Its negative meaning is more pervasive than its positive meanings.
The hammer and sickle is different in that when people see it, the first thing they would think of probably not be Holodomor or gulags. The Soviet crimes are not as well known as the Nazi war crimes.
Because the communists are denying the soviet crimes.
Economic Left: 4.00 Social Libertarian: 1.59 | Ich bin INFPMy Manga Gallery | Bertrand Russell: The Case for Socialism | On Holocaust Denial | My Views
by Maltropia » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:25 am
Bosakia wrote:Because the communists are denying the soviet crimes.
by Gigaverse » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:26 am
Ragnarokee wrote:Bosakia wrote:And how do we allow the hammer and sickle? It's a symbol of tyranny and the communists killed more people than the capitalists!
EXACTLY! This is why I made this thread (even though it's in the wrong place) the hammer and sickle are allowed, as are pro nazi nations/regions but the actual symbol its self is banned?
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student inlinguistics???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)
by Pandeeria » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:28 am
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Dogs of War » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:36 am
by Ragnarokee » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:40 am
Dogs of War wrote:They are banned because they became a problem. Obviously they look cool. They give your nation an evil look and they geometrically fit into most flag designs. With these facts, it is not too difficult to imagine that a lot of people, left, right and middle used Nazi symbolism on their flags. And why not? You want to play Nazi-Germany? Have a Nazi-Germany flag! With this thinking more and more and even more nazi-style flags popped up. If you came from outside the Nationstates community. Let's say you are a teacher or what ever and you have a look at this site all you see is nazi symbolism everywhere. So, from the outside it appeared as if nationstates was some kind of racist forum with tons of neo-nazis plotting the use of WMDs. In this situation the decision came that all swastikas had to go. I personally think this was an okay decision. All those nazi flags caused a lot of tensions. Many outsiders confused actual rp with real believes and many other roll players were simply offended. An other good thing is that people now have to think more about their flags. How make it look “evil” or “fascist” without going for the cheapest possible solution. As you can see when you browse through nationstates they came up with some nice ideas.
Bunkeranlage wrote:They're hardcore anarchic capitalists
by Dogs of War » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cavirfi, New Heldervinia, Repreteop
Advertisement