Advertisement
by Golgoglot » Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:58 pm
by Goobergunchia » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:51 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:58 am
by Massachussets Bay » Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:39 am
by Bergnovinaia » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:54 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not too keen on spelling mistakes (due to my strict drafting criteria), but I am not very impressed too when the definition is so vaguely defined and the proposal is rushed. Honoured ambassador to Bergnovinaia, I thought you did so well with the Biological Weapons Conference: why lapse so suddenly?
by Philimbesi » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:11 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:56 am
Bergnovinaia wrote:If you want to repeal it and re-draft, be my guest.
by Gobbannium » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:42 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not too keen on spelling mistakes (due to my strict drafting criteria)
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:14 am
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Oh for fuck's sake, don't you think enough time has been expended on insta-repeals and replacements already? Wait at least a couple months before bringing this subject up again, because I for one am sick of it.
by DEFENESTRATINATOR V2 » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:20 am
by Philimbesi » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:22 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:27 am
Philimbesi wrote:How ironic that the ambassador (rightfully) criticizes the Bergnovinaian delegation for premature submission and then chooses to muddy the waters of the ongoing debate by posting her repeal of the resolution before the original ever passes.
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:29 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:<snip> Insta-repeal nonsense.
by Philimbesi » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:38 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:it's about openness and listening to the opinions of fellow ambassadors and then revising, and revising, and revising, honoured ambassador. That's crash-testing, which I call it WA-NCAP for the purpose of drafting.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:42 am
Philimbesi wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:it's about openness and listening to the opinions of fellow ambassadors and then revising, and revising, and revising, honoured ambassador. That's crash-testing, which I call it WA-NCAP for the purpose of drafting.
Call it what you'd like ambassador what I'll choose to call it is rude. At least have the common sense to start it's own thread if you insist on dominating the spotlight so. I don't like insta-repeals though obviously I have participated in them but at least the Ambassador from Gray's Harbor and I had enough respect for the drafter of Protection of monuments to wait until it had passed.
by Krioval » Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:54 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:26 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Then once we have done that I'll arrange a trip to Antjepolis and the Brandenburg Gate, which I envisage as a possible SC HQ replacement.
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:34 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Philimbesi wrote:How ironic that the ambassador (rightfully) criticizes the Bergnovinaian delegation for premature submission and then chooses to muddy the waters of the ongoing debate by posting her repeal of the resolution before the original ever passes.
it's about openness and listening to the opinions of fellow ambassadors and then revising, and revising, and revising, honoured ambassador. That's crash-testing, which I call it WA-NCAP for the purpose of drafting.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:44 am
Mad Sheep Railgun wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Philimbesi wrote:How ironic that the ambassador (rightfully) criticizes the Bergnovinaian delegation for premature submission and then chooses to muddy the waters of the ongoing debate by posting her repeal of the resolution before the original ever passes.
it's about openness and listening to the opinions of fellow ambassadors and then revising, and revising, and revising, honoured ambassador. That's crash-testing, which I call it WA-NCAP for the purpose of drafting.
But how is this "openness" supposed to make Bergnovinaia feel? You helped him draft the thing. You let him add you as a co-author. You knew you were being listed as co-author because you commented on it, so apparently you were OK with the resolution at that point. And now you've not only turned against the resolution but you've thrown Bergnovinaia under the bus by starting the drafting of an insta-repeal in his At Vote thread. Where did you learn to treat people you're working with this way?
by Mad Sheep Railgun » Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:46 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Mad Sheep Railgun wrote:Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Philimbesi wrote:How ironic that the ambassador (rightfully) criticizes the Bergnovinaian delegation for premature submission and then chooses to muddy the waters of the ongoing debate by posting her repeal of the resolution before the original ever passes.
it's about openness and listening to the opinions of fellow ambassadors and then revising, and revising, and revising, honoured ambassador. That's crash-testing, which I call it WA-NCAP for the purpose of drafting.
But how is this "openness" supposed to make Bergnovinaia feel? You helped him draft the thing. You let him add you as a co-author. You knew you were being listed as co-author because you commented on it, so apparently you were OK with the resolution at that point. And now you've not only turned against the resolution but you've thrown Bergnovinaia under the bus by starting the drafting of an insta-repeal in his At Vote thread. Where did you learn to treat people you're working with this way?
I only highlighted the fact that no more than two co-authors could be listed under GA proposal rules, honoured ambassador. It could have gone either way.
by The Altani Federation » Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:42 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:37 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Bergnovinaia wrote:If you want to repeal it and re-draft, be my guest.
Oh for fuck's sake, don't you think enough time has been expended on insta-repeals and replacements already? Wait at least a couple months before bringing this subject up again, because I for one am sick of it.
*angrily hurls mincemeat pies in the general direction of the Bergnovinaian delegation*
by Krioval » Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:15 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:You know what, this is an insta-repeal of Protection of Monuments so give me a break... Besides, just becuase you may be able to sit at the computer for hours (or however long you actually do) doesn't mean I can. I have been really pressured between school, preparing for our tennis season, and practicing for a piano recital lately so I haven't had time to muse over each and every thought created by the WA members. However, I will do so in the future so I don't piss certain people off.
by Acadzia » Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:09 pm
by Philimbesi » Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:10 am
You know what, this is an insta-repeal of Protection of Monuments so give me a break...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement