But it does - it allowed the pre-ambulatory clauses to be written as if being argued by the author, rather than the WA.[/quote]
Ard has ruled as otherwise, her ruling was that "A Mean Old Man" at the beginning of the resolution wasn't apart of the resolution, because it went before the legitimate header, "The World Assembly," .. so the whole, "A Mean Old Man" line was inconsequential.
Even so, the question is whether pre-ambulatory clauses should be allowed to be read as if being argued by the nation that authored the proposal, rather than the WA.
Technically, R4 says nations not the WA. I'd prefer both, a nation's opinion can be adopted as the WA opinion... or it can be outright assumed to be otherwise from the start. BUT if one is doing the former, they have to make it explicitly clear that the WA is adopting their written opinion as its own.
Asking for people to use nation tags instead of 'my nation' wouldn't resolve this issue.
It would resolve the R4 concerns, it wouldn't resolve the problem of whom the resolution is 'from'.