by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:42 am
by Estovakiva » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:47 am
by Blademasters765 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:51 am
by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:57 am
Blademasters765 wrote:are you sure they just don't tend to like the resolutions at vote?
by Estovakiva » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:00 am
by Bodegraven » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:03 am
by Swkoll » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:05 am
by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:06 am
Swkoll wrote:Another idea: Hide the current voting tally from WA members who haven't voted yet.
by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:11 am
Bodegraven wrote:Lordieth wrote:
Just look at how often repeals pass. You can't tell me that there isn't a problem with auto-clicking in the WA. Less auto-clicking should in theory reduce needless repeals.
But it could also be that, like I sometimes do, vote FOR a resolution because you like it (I read it thoroughly, though), but when the Repeal for it comes around, I understand the flaws of the previously passed resolution and vote FOR the repeal so that a better version can be put in place, which WONT be repealed.
by Ballotonia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:52 am
by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:01 am
by Linux and the X » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:36 am
by Sheepatropolis » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:26 am
Linux and the X wrote:Proposals are generally reviewed by the forums even before submission. Upon submission, they must be approved by the delegates. Between the two of these, most resolutions that get to the floor are pretty good.
by Mahaj WA Seat » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:33 am
Beldonia wrote:Maybe we could make a resolution forcing nations to read a resolution.
Oh wait....WE TRIED THAT!
And it should be done in good faith.
Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.
NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.
Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.
by Jagalonia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:37 am
Estovakiva wrote:I would have to agree with this, a few nations who has just recently joined the WA just auto-clicks i guess being new to this site, and perhaps to RP as a whole?, mehh many assumptions. Or they like the resolutions, like the aninal cruelty one.
Tokyoni wrote:Hitler's mustache looks weird. Adam Smith was a drunken fatass. There, I've just pwned fascism and capitalism by such "logic".
Edlichbury wrote:OOC: If Knootoss can claim alcohol is a biological weapon, I can claim sentient Milk-People.
Senestrum wrote:Russians took the maximum allowable missile performances from the ABM treaty as design goals.
lolz ensued
by Sedgistan » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:40 am
Ollie Via wrote:Ok you brought up the idea of not showing how many votes for and against until the person has voted. What if you dont show how many were for and against until the resoultion has been past??
by Victorious Decepticons » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:45 am
Ollie Via wrote:Ok you brought up the idea of not showing how many votes for and against until the person has voted. What if you don't show how many were for and against until the resolution has been passed??
Newaswa wrote:What is the greatest threat to your nation?Vallermoore wrote:The Victorious Decepticons.Bluquse wrote:Imperialist, aggressive, and genociding aliens or interdimensional beings that would most likely slaughter or enslave us
rather than meet up to have a talk. :(TurtleShroom wrote:Also, like any sane, civilized nation, we always consider the Victorious Decepticons a clear, present, and obvious threat we must respect, honor, and leave alone in all circumstances. Always fear the Victorious Decepticons.
The Huskar Social Union wrote: ... massive empires of genocidal machines.
by Lordieth » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:04 pm
Victorious Decepticons wrote:I also like Lordieth's suggestion of a link to the debate thread. There are probably thousands of WA nations, but I remember that only a few were active in debating the proposals. Having a link might encourage more discussion as well as making it easier to find the viewpoints of those who've already debated.
by Mahaj WA Seat » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:17 pm
Lordieth wrote:Victorious Decepticons wrote:I also like Lordieth's suggestion of a link to the debate thread. There are probably thousands of WA nations, but I remember that only a few were active in debating the proposals. Having a link might encourage more discussion as well as making it easier to find the viewpoints of those who've already debated.
Exactly. This is by far the easiest change to make, and if it gets more people discussing and making an informed vote, then that's no bad thing.
Georgism wrote:Fuck off you cunt, I'm always nice.
NERVUN wrote:Yog zap!
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:I am the Urinater..... I'll be back.
Jedi Utopians wrote:5) Now, saying that a nation couldn't be part of OPEC would be bold. AIPEC sounds like something you'd want to get checked out by a physician for.
by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:20 pm
Lordieth wrote:Flipping the FOR/AGAINST button placements around randomly.
Sedgistan wrote:Yes, the 'lemming effect' does exist, but it's not a major problem, and it can be overcome.
by Beldonia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:21 pm
Mahaj WA Seat wrote:Lordieth wrote:
Exactly. This is by far the easiest change to make, and if it gets more people discussing and making an informed vote, then that's no bad thing.
Thats probably the best suggestion.
Contact Unibot, see if he'll put it in the big list.
Meanwhile, can [violet] or Pyth take a look and maybe do something about this?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Russian Brotherhood, Souverain Revachol
Advertisement