I thought this kind of stuff was verboten-
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=14531&p=527080#p527080
He's stepped up from the Donkocrats he's been using through the rest of the thread.
by Fartsniffage » Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:31 pm
by Ardchoille » Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:50 pm
by New Mitanni » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:53 pm
Ardchoille wrote:Addressed.
by Tech-gnosis » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:00 pm
New Mitanni wrote:As for "elephant jokes," you won't see any because nobody can make any.
by Reploid Productions » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:01 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by New Mitanni » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:17 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:
And I don't think you want to go trolling in Moderation, even if you're trying to make a point that you can make an elephant-based troll remark about republicans.
by Ardchoille » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:18 pm
New Mitanni wrote:If I'd known that'd be your reaction, I would have used "Ass-o-crats" instead. Probably more descriptive at that.
by New Mitanni » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:05 pm
Ardchoille wrote:Politically based nicknames have some relevance, and mostly get left alone; it's accepted that neither side of politics loves their opponents and both will exploit what they perceive as weaknesses. You quote "Busheviks"; that's got a political twist (cf Bolsheviks ->Third Party Conference -> the effects of Bush supporters on the Republican party). So if you'd been making a political point, something along the lines of "donk" being a word for a bad poker-player, and the Democrats using a donkey as their symbol, and your view of their economic policies being that they're bluffing from a weak hand, I'd probably have dismissed the complaint.
by Ardchoille » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:53 pm
New Mitanni wrote:It's probably time to just shoot this thing and leave it in a ditch somewhere.
by Sarzonia » Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:12 am
by Ardchoille » Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:23 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement