Advertisement
by Imperial Catholicism » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:05 pm
by Zarquon Froods » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:19 pm
Govers wrote:We are all on one planet, it's called the WORLD Assembly, not the STAR assembly or Space Assembly... how can we agree to something written so haphazardly - Vote AGAINST, at least to force a rewrite of this spoor piece of legislation.
by Darenjo » Fri Mar 04, 2011 3:50 am
by Flibbleites » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:22 am
by Zarquon Froods » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:31 am
by Mousebumples » Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:30 pm
by Cool Egg Sandwich » Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:31 pm
Mousebumples wrote:Hey, Bob! Who won the bidding to detonate the damn thing?
It is gone, right? I figured there would have been a party or something, but everyone here seems disgustingly sober, all things considered.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:36 pm
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:Mousebumples wrote:Hey, Bob! Who won the bidding to detonate the damn thing?
It is gone, right? I figured there would have been a party or something, but everyone here seems disgustingly sober, all things considered.
I think I saw something exploding away in the night sky, but I don't really remember because as Ambassador from CES, I must partake in monthly "acid-tests" for the betterment of our society.
by Cool Egg Sandwich » Fri Mar 04, 2011 1:39 pm
by Monxcleyr » Fri Mar 04, 2011 4:38 pm
by Moronist Decisions » Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:32 pm
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:The government of CES has reluctantly decided to commit its entire trade surplus of approx $200 billion corn dogs [not sure the conversion in ISD] as a bid, of sorts, for sole usage of the former WASRS facilities.
Rgds.,
by Bears Armed » Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:40 am
Monxcleyr wrote:To keep the RP reasonable, you must understand that a space station would have never been built by now. Not only is it a lengthy and complex building procedure. Why would you have repealed it AFTER spending all the money needed to launch numerous vehicles, and have astronauts assemble it. So the repeal would have logically happened before anything was launched, and most likely, because anything was physically made for testing. So bidding on the destruction, or bidding to purchase the unused space station are completely unrealistic.
by Flibbleites » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:06 am
Mousebumples wrote:Hey, Bob! Who won the bidding to detonate the damn thing?
It is gone, right? I figured there would have been a party or something, but everyone here seems disgustingly sober, all things considered.
by Darenjo » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:19 pm
by Unibot II » Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:58 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:51 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:45 pm
Unibot II wrote:Eduard looked up at the sky and saw the fireworks of what remained of the Space Research Station.
"Well, that was waste...and.. probably violated GA#63, with the proximity to a celestial body." Eduard said with a frown.
by Monxcleyr » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:20 pm
by Flibbleites » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:21 pm
Monxcleyr wrote:OOC: Again, I must stress, for people who are so into doing realistic roleplay in this game, you must realize how absurd it is to continue to say the station was destroyed. and putting [WASRS DESTROYED] in the thread title is only promoting inaccurate and childish roleplaying. My previous post explains it very clearly, in case you don't know why. I am sure we all want to have a fun and realistic roleplay experience, and something like this really distracts from the immersion and the professional tone.
by Darenjo » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:30 pm
Monxcleyr wrote:OOC: Again, I must stress, for people who are so into doing realistic roleplay in this game, you must realize how absurd it is to continue to say the station was destroyed. and putting [WASRS DESTROYED] in the thread title is only promoting inaccurate and childish roleplaying. My previous post explains it very clearly, in case you don't know why. I am sure we all want to have a fun and realistic roleplay experience, and something like this really distracts from the immersion and the professional tone.
by Cool Egg Sandwich » Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:36 pm
Darenjo wrote:Monxcleyr wrote:OOC: Again, I must stress, for people who are so into doing realistic roleplay in this game, you must realize how absurd it is to continue to say the station was destroyed. and putting [WASRS DESTROYED] in the thread title is only promoting inaccurate and childish roleplaying. My previous post explains it very clearly, in case you don't know why. I am sure we all want to have a fun and realistic roleplay experience, and something like this really distracts from the immersion and the professional tone.
OOC: Oh, lighten up. I recently was in a thread where there was a woman who couldn't properly fire a gun (Mrs. Thekenbail). This is the GA. Yes, we try to keep it realistic, but forgive us for having fun.
And I thought that putting "WASRS DESTROYED" in the title was an excellent decision.
by Philimbesi » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:44 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]
Advertisement