Wow. I think what the Assembly just witnessed was a master class in diplomacy.
The Republic of Tsim Sha Tsui votes "no", and hope the supporters of the next proposal bring a little more class.
Advertisement
by Tsim Sha Tsui » Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:10 am
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:56 am
Tsim Sha Tsui wrote:The Associated Peoples wrote:Maybe it's because they are weak and I choose to ignore them
Wow. I think what the Assembly just witnessed was a master class in diplomacy.
The Republic of Tsim Sha Tsui votes "no", and hope the supporters of the next proposal bring a little more class.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Coyote Coalition » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:26 am
Tsim Sha Tsui wrote:The Associated Peoples wrote:Maybe it's because they are weak and I choose to ignore them
Wow. I think what the Assembly just witnessed was a master class in diplomacy.
The Republic of Tsim Sha Tsui votes "no", and hope the supporters of the next proposal bring a little more class.
by Lykosia » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:51 am
III. URGES member nations to supply specimens of seeds, saplings and genetic animal materials (sperm, eggs and DNA).
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:55 am
Lykosia wrote:III. URGES member nations to supply specimens of seeds, saplings and genetic animal materials (sperm, eggs and DNA).
Sorry, maybe this is a silly question, but what's the sperm, eggs and DNA for? Is it for bring back the extinct animals something?
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:03 am
II. EMPOWERS staff scientists to research advanced methods of artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, cloning and efficient horticultural replenishment, as well as the study of keystone species and methods for rebuilding ecosystems.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Lykosia » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:20 am
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:24 am
Lykosia wrote:To do that, I think it must be in "Critically Endangered" or "Extinct in the Wild" category, because it's impossible to bring back the completely extinct animals with those methods as far as I know.
SEEKING to install safeguards for the recovery of any species that falls victim to an extinction event.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by NewCalifornia-Republic » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:25 am
by Just Guy » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:24 am
The Associated Peoples wrote:Just Guy wrote:You haven't responded to any of my arguments...
Maybe it's because they are weak and I choose to ignore them anything I had to say on the matters have already as far as I'm concerned been addressed to an adequate degree. Basically we disagree on what to accept as reality.Your camps position is there is only one planet and race of sentient species.My camp recognizes the validity of non-human sentients and other occupied celestial bodies.I can't argue with a delusional being that chooses to not see the members of this assembly that are right before their eyes.As far as the one versus more than one facility argument goes once again weak and answered more than once you are just unwilling to accept it and that's fine I will not waste my time trying to sway a person who's view is as limited as yours.Good day to you ambassador enjoy your narrow minded position.
I'm not a scientist so I couldn't say what acceptable preservation methods would be sure I can read real world examples and use those but NS is extremely varied in it's technological advancements and lack there of.I believe I've even seen things written by a cave man.His version of acceptable and mine would differ greatly.Am I to suggest methods that are sub par to those that may exist elsewhere or accept the fact that many nations are much more advanced than I am myself and may have better solutions that they can bring to the table.It would be quite elitist of me to ignore those that role-play in a manner different than mine.
Looking at the popular vote as opposed to the delegate votes you are in the minority in your opinion but I accept the fact that the delegates with the larger power bases often have the loudest voting voice and am certainly fine with that
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:45 am
Just Guy wrote:I have never said there is only one planet, race, and whatever else you come up with. What you RP in NS exists when other players recognise it. Although I do draw the line somewhere, I do accept the existence of multiple planets and races.
The only thing which I have said is that arctic, as a region, only refers to the region surrounding Earth's north pole -- which is, as far as I know, the only such definition in the English language.
IC:
Don simply stares at the ambassador from The Associated People in shock.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Agrall » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:50 am
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:54 am
Agrall wrote:Well I must say I looked over the proposal and quite liked it. It's nice seeing a nationstate going out of their way to preserve nature. You have a yes from the Allied States of Agrall.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Lykosia » Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:37 am
For me, its a typical resolution: unnecessary and too vague. They do not mention if Human DNA will be included, either.
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:42 am
Lykosia wrote:Wait, so the arctic region here is arctic regions anywhere in any planets and dimensions in NS?
Oh yea, I recently receive a comment from The Voltarum:For me, its a typical resolution: unnecessary and too vague. They do not mention if Human DNA will be included, either.
I think you should revise this resolution a bit. But still, Lykosia strongly support this resolution and expect the other nations to support this too.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:57 am
That would be correct ambassador.Lykosia wrote:The arctic region here is arctic regions anywhere in any planets and dimensions in NS?
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:31 am
Just Guy wrote:The only thing which I have said is that arctic, as a region, only refers to the region surrounding Earth's north pole -- which is, as far as I know, the only such definition in the English language.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:53 am
Just Guy wrote:Already have, but way too late to stomp it. Damn Alsted.
by St George of England » Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:57 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:39 am
St George of England wrote:Taking away the 506 votes Guy has, the resolution stands at :
Votes For: 2230
Votes Against: 1734
by Just Guy » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:42 am
by Teshuva » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:44 am
The Coyote Coalition wrote:I did forget to further elaborate on one point, acceptable methods of preservation would read as methods that acceptably preserve the genetic materials, ensuring their utility and safe storage. Should a method not be proven to adequately maintain the genetic materials, it clearly isn't an acceptable method of preservation. Of course, that could all be simplified by saying, "requires acceptable preservation methods to be observed."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Daphomir
Advertisement