Advertisement
by Cobhanglica » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:41 pm
by Allrule » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:43 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:You want to give that Communist a commendation?
by Cobhanglica » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:44 pm
by Allrule » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:47 pm
by United Dependencies » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:00 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Nadkor » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:02 pm
by Potarius » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:04 pm
Allrule wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:I'm sorry, but I despise that thing perhaps more than any other poster on here. If someone is going ask NSG what they think of commending him, I have to give my input.
I knew you were the most conservative of all NSG conservatives (NM got deleted, again), but I never knew you considered your opponents less than human. That's just pathetic.
by United Dependencies » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:07 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:You want to give that Communist a commendation?
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Cobhanglica » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:21 pm
by Farnhamia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:24 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:United Dependencies wrote:Really?
I don't think I've seen TCT post his economic views. Unless we're talking about someone else I'd really like to see where this has happened.
I'm more referring to his social views, which tend to be in line with those views espoused by leftists. He supports unfettered immigration to the United States and opposes anything that could preserve our cultural traditions or national identity. Also, I recall him attempting to decry the right of individuals to freedom of association in a thread some time back.
by Potarius » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:25 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:
I'm more referring to his social views, which tend to be in line with those views espoused by leftists. He supports unfettered immigration to the United States and opposes anything that could preserve our cultural traditions or national identity. Also, I recall him attempting to decry the right of individuals to freedom of association in a thread some time back.
Yes, he probably did express the opinion that discrimination is a bad thing and that laws against it are not unjust to people who discriminate.
by United Dependencies » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:33 pm
noun
1. ( initial capital letter ) a member of the Communist party or movement.
2. an advocate of communism.
3. a person who is regarded as supporting politically leftist or subversive causes.
4. ( usually initial capital letter ) a Communard.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Unibot » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:50 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Nazi Flower Power » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:52 pm
by NERVUN » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:20 pm
by Cobhanglica » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:29 pm
NERVUN wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:I'm sorry, but I despise that thing perhaps more than any other poster on here. If someone is going ask NSG what they think of commending him, I have to give my input.
And I'm not happy with flamebaiting. We can accept one poster disliking another, we cannot accept refering to another poster as a thing. *** Warned for flamebaiting ***.
by NERVUN » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Hassett wrote:So does this mean we can condemn generalites too?
by The Cat-Tribe » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:58 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:NERVUN wrote:And I'm not happy with flamebaiting. We can accept one poster disliking another, we cannot accept refering to another poster as a thing. *** Warned for flamebaiting ***.
Ok, I won't refer to TCT as a thing. In order to conform to the rules of the site, I will refer to him as a human being. But, he will never get a shred of respect from me so long as he adheres to his ideology and continues to go to such lengths to defend it.
by Unibot » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Frequently Asked Questions
Reduction of Abortion Act
Authored by The Cat-Tribe,
Formatted by Unibot,
- Does this resolution address the legality or illegality of abortion, whether abortion is a right, or whether abortion is moral?
No. The resolution is completely neutral on these issues. In fact, Clause 6 of the resolution states:6. DECLARES that nothing in this resolution shall affect the power of member states to declare abortion legal or illegal or to pass legislation extending or restricting access to abortion- Does this resolution harm the interests or rights of women?
No. This resolution does not make abortion illegal, declare abortion immoral, or restrict any rights that women may have. To the contrary, it empowers women by providing the right to information about and increased access to (1) abstinence education, (2) adoption services, (3) contraceptives, (4) family planning services, (5) pre-natal, obstetric, and post-natal medical care, counseling, and services, (6) comprehensive sex education, and (7) education, awareness, prevention, and counseling programs to prevent rape and incest. The result is that women have increased control over becoming pregnant in the first place.- Does this resolution harm the interests or rights of the unborn?
No. This resoution does not make abortion legal, declare abortion moral, or restrict any rights that the unborn may have. To the contrary, this resolution seeks to prevent destruction of the unborn by preventing unwanted pregnancies and other incentives for abortion. The resolution further seeks to remove barriers to childbirth, whether they be economic or medical.- Does this resolution significantly infringe national sovereignty?
Not IMHO. Although the resolution does create a right in Clause 2 to access to information regarding abortion reduction services, the next two active clauses do not require nations to do anything -- they strongly urge and encourage actions by nations. Further Clause 5 gives some increased responsibility to the World Health Authority (WHA), but limits its provision of abortion reduction services to comply with national and local laws.- If it doesn't infringe national sovereignty, does this resolution do anything?
Clause 2 of the resolution creates a right of all individuals to access information regarding abortion reduction services. This alone could significantly reduce unwanted pregnancies and remove incentives for abortion.
I may be naive, but it is my hope that most nations will take seriously this topic and follow what Clauses 3 and 4 urge.
Clause 5 empowers the WHA to help nations provide abortion reduction services, research relevant subjects, and facilitate the sharing of technology among member nations. Again, this should help reduce abortion rates.- I see the resolution refers to "abstinence education." What does this mean?
Effective, comprehensive sex education is called for by the resolution. One aspect of such education can be an emphasis on abstinence as a means of avoiding unwanted pregnancies and other consequences of sex. This is NOT a call for "abstinence-only" programs that do nothing other than try to teach abstinence. Abstinence education as part of a broader range of information can be an effective part of preventing unwanted pregnancies and reducing abortion rates.- Why is this an international issue within the purview of the World Assembly?
For those concerned with the plight of the unborn (even those that believe the unborn don't have rights), this resolution addresses an international problem of abortion without restricting any freedoms.
For those concerned with the rights of women, this resolution addresses an international problem of unintended pregnancies and unnecessary medical procedures. It empowers women to make reproductive choices without coercion. Further, women die every year from unnecessary and unsafe abortions.1
The ability of the WHA to help nations share technology, conduct research, and provide universal access to abortion reduction services is unique and is a proper role for the World Assembly.
1.OCC: In RL, some 700,000 women die each year from unsafe abortions. Although abortion can be a very safe procedure when legal but regulated, empowering women to avoid unnecessary medical procedures and make informed reproductive decisions is desirable.- The resolution refers to the World Health Authority. Isn't this a House of Cards violation of the rules? What happens if prior resolutions about the WHA are repealed?
The rules for WA Proposals expressly says that "you may assign duties to an existing committee," such as the WHA. The rules further state that "[s]hould the Resolution that creates the committee be Repealed, the committee will continue to exist, but in a reduced capacity." World Assembly Resolution #31 creates the World Health Agency and WHA offices in member states.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Unibot » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:01 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Nazi Flower Power » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:05 pm
The Cat-Tribe wrote:P.S. I've got to stop even checking NSG or even this thread. When I do, I cant help posting!!!
by Barringtonia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:08 pm
by Unibot » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:08 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by NERVUN » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:14 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Duvniask, Einsiev, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Katuris, Kubra, Sarduri, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, The New York Nation, Tiami
Advertisement