Advertisement
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:47 am
According to this, 67.4 is no longer in the game.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:50 am
Jutsa wrote:I think he's submitting them under He Qixin 2, but I'm honestly not sure.
by Bollesiatan » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:39 am
by The Gamma Monster » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:44 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:58 am
2.“Someone must be blamed for the loss of industrial efficiency that these suicides have caused us,” the Director of the State Railways comments frankly. “These incidents are inconvenient, and handling them requires a lot of time and effort; and time is, of course, money. It’s not right that these people get away with disrupting state productivity, as well as the travel arrangement of our toiling workers. I humbly suggest that their families should be held accountable, and arrested. It’s only fair.”
by Bears Armed » Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:40 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:2.“Someone must be blamed for the loss of industrial efficiency that these suicides have caused us,” the Director of the State Railways comments frankly. “These incidents are inconvenient, and handling them requires a lot of time and effort; and time is, of course, money. It’s not right that these people get away with disrupting state productivity, as well as the travel arrangement of our toiling workers. I humbly suggest that their families should be held accountable, and arrested. It’s only fair.”
Hmm. Fixed that to arrangements.
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:08 am
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:12 am
by Zimbabwean Tibet » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:45 pm
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:25 pm
by Heliosphere » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:30 pm
The Issue
The privilege of diplomatic immunity for ambassadors has entered the news after several of them have been caught in unsavory behavior, including drunk driving, fist fights, and the attempted murder of a Brancalandian Member of Parliament. Concerned citizens and outraged foreign nationals have asked your government to step in and bring your ambassadors in line.
The Debate
1. “The solution is quite simple,” states your Minister of Foreign Affairs while trying to smooth things over with his Brancalandian counterpart. “Why don’t we simply fire any ambassador who acts like a buffoon? We obviously can’t have our diplomats acting like spoiled children and besmirching our good name. We must replace them with the most upstanding members of society. Problem solved!”
2. “That still doesn’t change the fact that your ambassador tried to kill one of our MPs!” replies the Brancalandian Foreign Minister, who has started a slap fight with your own Minister of Foreign Affairs. “I demand that all ambassadors have their diplomatic immunity revoked so that we can charge them for all of the crimes they have committed. No person should be above the law! To make it fair, we wouldn’t complain if you also took away immunity from all of the foreign diplomats in Heliosphere.”
3. “Being a diplomat is so stressful,” complains Nelson Sorin, your former ambassador to Tasmania, who has taken it upon himself to stop the fighting between the two ministers. “You send us off to these dangerous hellholes all across the South Pacific. Is it any wonder that some of us snap? Our job is to promote the nation’s interests and help find new allies. We need diplomatic immunity to ensure our safety as national envoys, guarantee our freedom of movement, and maybe let off some steam on the weekends. I think that’s a small price to pay for a little international embarrassment.”
4. “Ambassadors! Bah! Who needs them?” questions infamous nationalist and staunch xenophobe Tanya Bouvier while giving a salute that makes everyone in the room uncomfortable. “This compulsive need to learn about other countries or grant their diplomats safe passage is very un-Heliospherean. We’d be much better off keeping to ourselves and not having to worry about these damn foreigners or their opinions on how we conduct our business.”
5. “Diplomatic immunity, you say?” muses Brenda Harkness, your Minister of Sycophancy. “Why should this just be limited to ambassadors? It seems to me that if anyone deserves immunity, it’s you. You’re practically a god to these people anyway. You should be able to do whatever you want.”
is Issue
Issue by The Free Secular Federation of Nation of Quebec
Edited by Pogaria
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:59 pm
by Ransium » Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:56 pm
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:59 pm
by Jutsa » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:09 pm
by Trotterdam » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:45 pm
#912 Ambassadors Behaving MadlyI got different names from Heliosphere, so I can confirm they're random. Note that the gender of the pronoun in option 1 might be too, but I can't confirm that currently.
The Issue
The privilege of diplomatic immunity for ambassadors has entered the news after several of them have been caught in unsavory behavior, including drunk driving, fist fights, and the attempted murder of a Brancalandian Member of Parliament. Concerned citizens and outraged foreign nationals have asked your government to step in and bring your ambassadors in line.
The Debate
1. "The solution is quite simple," states your Minister of Foreign Affairs while trying to smooth things over with his Brancalandian counterpart. "Why don't we simply fire any ambassador who acts like a buffoon? We obviously can't have our diplomats acting like spoiled children and besmirching our good name. We must replace them with the most upstanding members of society. Problem solved!"
2. "That still doesn't change the fact that your ambassador tried to kill one of our MPs!" replies the Brancalandian Foreign Minister, who has started a slap fight with your own Minister of Foreign Affairs. "I demand that all ambassadors have their diplomatic immunity revoked so that we can charge them for all of the crimes they have committed. No person should be above the law! To make it fair, we wouldn't complain if you also took away immunity from all of the foreign diplomats in @@NAME@@."
3. "Being a diplomat is so stressful," complains @@RANDOMNAME@@, your former ambassador to Tasmania, who has taken it upon @@HIM/HER@@self to stop the fighting between the two ministers. "You send us off to these dangerous hellholes all across @@REGION@@. Is it any wonder that some of us snap? Our job is to promote the nation's interests and help find new allies. We need diplomatic immunity to ensure our safety as national envoys, guarantee our freedom of movement, and maybe let off some steam on the weekends. I think that's a small price to pay for a little international embarrassment."
4. "Ambassadors! Bah! Who needs them?" questions infamous nationalist and staunch xenophobe @@RANDOMNAME@@ while giving a salute that makes everyone in the room uncomfortable. "This compulsive need to learn about other countries or grant their diplomats safe passage is very un-@@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@. We'd be much better off keeping to ourselves and not having to worry about these damn foreigners or their opinions on how we conduct our business."
5. "Diplomatic immunity, you say?" muses @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Sycophancy. "Why should this just be limited to ambassadors? It seems to me that if anyone deserves immunity, it's you. You're practically a god to these people anyway. You should be able to do whatever you want."
Issue by Nation of Quebec
Edited by Pogaria
I think #911 is reserved. (It's the emergency phone number in the US, and also the date of those famous terrorist attacks. Plenty of material there.)
You can't just assume.Jutsa wrote:Added a validity to option 3, since I can't imagine nations without a secret police force getting this.
You mean "courtesy".Ransium wrote:FYI all instances of Marche Noir in the issue base have been updated to Marche Noire curtesy of Joy.
by Leutria » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:52 pm
Jutsa wrote:According to this, 67.4 is no longer in the game.
Edit: Fixing that right away! Keeping that in my little reserve file.
(It's probably hopelessly unnecessary but better safe than sorry?)
by Jutsa » Sat Feb 24, 2018 6:52 am
by Trotterdam » Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:32 am
I think it could be interesting to keep a historical record of major changes to issues, but not interspersed with the current spoiler list.Jutsa wrote:Eh, I could... but idk, it'd get too confusing with all the rewrites to consider.
I could just keep deleted options instead of both... idk, that's up for debate.
by Jutsa » Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:35 am
by Awesome country of jj » Sat Feb 24, 2018 11:53 am
by Trotterdam » Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:11 pm
Oops, I forgot to check.Jutsa wrote:Before I update #191, I have to ask: Is option 1 and/or 3 also changed, then?
Because, option 3's narrative kinda relies on option 2, atm.
by Jutsa » Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:01 pm
by Trotterdam » Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:13 pm
917? We haven't quite reached that far yet.Jutsa wrote:Keep an eye out for 910.3, 911, and any other options 917 may have.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariesee
Advertisement