kek
Advertisement
by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:28 pm
by The East Marches » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:30 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Oh man, we're talking about Makaveli? I love Tupac!
by Conserative Morality » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:48 pm
The East Marches wrote:Tupac is alive in Serbia, have you seen him recently?
by Jumalariik » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:53 pm
by Jochizyd Republic » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:08 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Jochizyd Republic wrote:Well, it's surprising that you would say that.
You, for real think, that therw cannot be a TradCon Politician in the West that doesn't oppose people from multiple ethnicities existing in one country and doesn't think Muslims are scum?
Multiple ethnicities, sure, especially in states with a long history of ethnic diversity. Religion is an entirely different matter. Culture and religion are indelibly intertwined; the traditional cultural identity of a nation that is historically dominantly Christian is therefore inherently threatened by the emergence of a religiously pluralistic society. A traditionalist may tolerate the existence of other religions within the borders of their country, but is unlikely to welcome alien religious traditions, especially of the proselytising kind. I for one certainly don't hate Islam or possess any desire to persecute individual Muslims for their beliefs, but I'd rather there were none here. I don't really mind the existence of small, non-proselytising religious minorities such as Sikhs, Hindus and Jews in the UK, but generally I'm prejudiced towards any religious group besides Anglican and Presbyterian Christianity (smaller Protestant groups like the Methodists and Quakers, I'm mostly fine with; that doesn't extend to American-influenced evangelical sects).
Hopefully the British Muslim community will eventually become a stable demographic minority, assimilate into British culture and lose ties with its overseas origins.
by Minzerland II » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:11 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:15 pm
by Jochizyd Republic » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:15 pm
by FelrikTheDeleted » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:16 pm
by Minzerland II » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:18 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by The Empire of Pretantia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:18 pm
by FelrikTheDeleted » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:20 pm
by Minzerland II » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:20 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by -Fahrong- » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:20 pm
Jochizyd Republic wrote:Old Tyrannia wrote:Multiple ethnicities, sure, especially in states with a long history of ethnic diversity. Religion is an entirely different matter. Culture and religion are indelibly intertwined; the traditional cultural identity of a nation that is historically dominantly Christian is therefore inherently threatened by the emergence of a religiously pluralistic society. A traditionalist may tolerate the existence of other religions within the borders of their country, but is unlikely to welcome alien religious traditions, especially of the proselytising kind. I for one certainly don't hate Islam or possess any desire to persecute individual Muslims for their beliefs, but I'd rather there were none here. I don't really mind the existence of small, non-proselytising religious minorities such as Sikhs, Hindus and Jews in the UK, but generally I'm prejudiced towards any religious group besides Anglican and Presbyterian Christianity (smaller Protestant groups like the Methodists and Quakers, I'm mostly fine with; that doesn't extend to American-influenced evangelical sects).
Hopefully the British Muslim community will eventually become a stable demographic minority, assimilate into British culture and lose ties with its overseas origins.
Fair enough.
But the major western faith traditions still in existence, I believe, if adhered to correctly, share common values and goals, they can all be utilized to bring about a more or less ideal society in the West. Having the various religious communities present to preserve common interests of tradition while operating within the framework of western culture and generally assimilating, I think is entirely possible while still keeping a national identity.
by Quokkastan » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:30 pm
by Oskary » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:34 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Oskary wrote:
Ho there, friend. Could you explain distributist economics to me?
Simply put, a distributist economy is an economy in which ownership of the means of production is distributed as widely between members of society as possible, maximising the number of people who own their own property and possess the capacity to produce their own capital. It advocates the replacement of large corporations with smaller businesses owned by sole traders or partnerships. Such an economic model would be more sustainable and reduce wealth gaps between the richest and poorest individuals in society, whilst preserving the concept of private property and the competitive nature of capitalism that makes it so efficient.
by FelrikTheDeleted » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:51 pm
by FelrikTheDeleted » Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:57 pm
by Wulfenia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:03 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:It's called being a reactionary. No wonder you're unpopular.
by Quokkastan » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:03 pm
by FelrikTheDeleted » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:04 pm
by Germanic Templars » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:14 pm
by Jochizyd Republic » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:21 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Abrahamia-, Almonaster Nuevo, Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Deblar, Dresderstan, Godular, Ifreann, Outer Bratorke, Philjia, Port Carverton, Repreteop, San Lumen, Shrillland, Simonia, Southland, Spirit of Hope, The Confederate States of America, The Lone Alliance, Uiiop, Valyxias, Vassenor, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement