Yeah, but Puz, the bullpup AK, the 12.7 MG/rifle/thing. That's worth at least ten Internet Slav points.
Advertisement
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:00 pm
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:01 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:07 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:There seems to be a solid Russian userbase there.
So who's Sturgeon?
by United Latin Lesbians » Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:22 pm
Eisarn-Ara wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:What is this Sturgeonshouse place?
It has a nuclear forum and seems moderately Soviet-friendly.
It shits on the M113fapper regularly, and it's like if that "space battles" forum weren't run by autists, just militaria collectors researchers. The TFB writer's staff is on there, same for Othais from C&rsenal (albeit briefly), shit the InrangeTV & Forgottenweapons crowd are on there off/on.
Edit:
Welcome to Syria Fuccbois.
by Rhodesialund » Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:23 pm
Puzikas wrote:The TL;DR of how the SKS came to be is basically:
-USSR desired self loading infantry rifle as a result of its several decades of wanting one but never getting a proper one
-Enter Tokarevs design
-While good enough the SVT design leaves much to be desired: Federov had the right ideas
-Rimmed ammo is hard to make high-capacity, reliable magazines from
-prototype ammunitions
-Siminov, go!
-Oh fug nabzis DDD
-build more tanks, shift production focus to already existing arms and simplification
-lower funds to projects means less developed
-Okay Nazis are on the run on both fronts, hueg tank army now, war will be over soon
-Back to making rifles
-Hey you know what would be cool? A cohesive intermediate cartridge
-Here Siminov make rifle in this
-okay thanks we'll use this
-Nvm Kalashnikovs design is cooler.
by Rhodesialund » Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:28 pm
Gallia- wrote:too bad m16 is better than fal
by Spreewerke » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:11 pm
Taihei Tengoku wrote:I'm not sure the Russian stocks of Mosins have made it onto the market. The ones that were imported are all Belarusian or Ukrainian stockpiles.
Purpelia wrote:That's how military procurement is made.
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:01 pm
Spreewerke wrote:
Spoiler Alert: There were three requirements set forth by the German military, and the rifle that was adopted only met one of them.
by Gallia- » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:05 pm
by Rhodesialund » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:29 pm
by Eisarn-Ara » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:04 pm
Gallia- wrote:Eisarn-Ara wrote:
If a book were to be written about this, it would be called "How to 3rd Reich correctly & why two front wars are suicidal".
Yes.
It only took 50 years for the United States to lose its two front war. Ironically, this occurred immediately after the capitulation of its opponent!
by Gallia- » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:30 pm
by The Kievan People » Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:59 pm
Allanea wrote:WTF does 'killing America' mean in this context? America is doing exceptionally well in any measure that matters.
by Allanea » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:22 am
by Ragnarum » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:40 am
by Allanea » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:53 am
by Husseinarti » Tue Aug 23, 2016 6:43 am
Rhodesialund wrote:Puzikas wrote:The TL;DR of how the SKS came to be is basically:
-USSR desired self loading infantry rifle as a result of its several decades of wanting one but never getting a proper one
-Enter Tokarevs design
-While good enough the SVT design leaves much to be desired: Federov had the right ideas
-Rimmed ammo is hard to make high-capacity, reliable magazines from
-prototype ammunitions
-Siminov, go!
-Oh fug nabzis :DDDD
-build more tanks, shift production focus to already existing arms and simplification
-lower funds to projects means less developed
-Okay Nazis are on the run on both fronts, hueg tank army now, war will be over soon
-Back to making rifles
-Hey you know what would be cool? A cohesive intermediate cartridge
-Here Siminov make rifle in this
-okay thanks we'll use this
-Nvm Kalashnikovs design is cooler.
by Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 » Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:12 am
The Kievan People wrote:Allanea wrote:WTF does 'killing America' mean in this context? America is doing exceptionally well in any measure that matters.
There are some issues. The US economy has deteriorated noticeably since the 2008 crisis and there is no sign of a recovery. It's post 2008 performance has been the worst since the great depression, so I am not sure how you call this "doing exceptionally well", and some of the trends are particularly worrying. Labour productivity is actually going down and labour force participation never recovered to pre-crisis levels after 2008. Less workers who are less productive is not a sign of economic health.
America is doing well in comparison to say, the Eurozone. But that is a very low bar these days.
by Gallia- » Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:34 am
Allanea wrote:WTF does 'killing America' mean in this context? America is doing exceptionally well in any measure that matters.
Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502 wrote:The Kievan People wrote:
There are some issues. The US economy has deteriorated noticeably since the 2008 crisis and there is no sign of a recovery. It's post 2008 performance has been the worst since the great depression, so I am not sure how you call this "doing exceptionally well", and some of the trends are particularly worrying. Labour productivity is actually going down and labour force participation never recovered to pre-crisis levels after 2008. Less workers who are less productive is not a sign of economic health.
America is doing well in comparison to say, the Eurozone. But that is a very low bar these days.
I blame Reagan. We were doing pretty well until him. Ever since, he's been the patron saint of every right-wing blowhard, landing the US squarely into Gilded Age, v2.0.
Allanea wrote:Yes, in the very short term there are some economic issues. But in any meaningful historical term scale America is incredibly wealthy.
And decreasing labor force participation is a historical trend over generations. It's not wholly bad.
by Puzikas » Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:45 am
Ragnarum wrote:Does anybody know how reliable the belt feed adaptor's for RPK's are?
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Ardavia » Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:14 pm
by Crookfur » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:22 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Dayganistan
Advertisement