by [violet] » Wed May 27, 2009 11:02 pm
by Quintessence of Dust » Thu May 28, 2009 4:38 am
by Cobdenia » Thu May 28, 2009 4:41 am
by Australian Labor Party » Thu May 28, 2009 4:43 am
by [violet] » Thu May 28, 2009 4:45 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:"Bobtopia is condemned for [forum activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning forum activity
"Bobistan is commended for [gameplay activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning gameplay activity
Cobdenia wrote:Had a look at it and couldn;t see where one selects nation or region - just all codey stuff whatsitdoodles, so I'm thinking it's not quite polished yet.
by Quintessence of Dust » Thu May 28, 2009 4:50 am
Under the MetaGaming section of the rules. For example, in the past resolutions to condemn the genocide going on in Genocidetopia, or the region-crashing of Nicepeacefulregiontopia by Bignastyinvadertopia, have been deleted by moderators. Hersfold's Olympic Games resolution established the precedent of not permitting mention of forum activity; I imagine the gameplay equivalent was introduced even earlier.[violet] wrote:Quintessence of Dust wrote:"Bobtopia is condemned for [forum activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning forum activity
"Bobistan is commended for [gameplay activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning gameplay activity
Where are those things banned?
by Cobdenia » Thu May 28, 2009 4:51 am
by Cobdenia » Thu May 28, 2009 5:04 am
by Mexar » Thu May 28, 2009 5:05 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:My point is we cannot, as it stands, write a Global Disarmament resolution to ban Bobtopia from arming itself, nor can we write a Furtherment of Democracy resolution to require Bob's Region to vote on who its delegate should be, yet these categories could be used as a reach-around on both.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Thu May 28, 2009 5:21 am
by [violet] » Thu May 28, 2009 5:28 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:[violet] wrote:Quintessence of Dust wrote:"Bobtopia is condemned for [forum activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning forum activity
"Bobistan is commended for [gameplay activity]" <-- illegal for mentioning gameplay activity
Where are those things banned?
Under the MetaGaming section of the rules. For example, in the past resolutions to condemn the genocide going on in Genocidetopia, or the region-crashing of Nicepeacefulregiontopia by Bignastyinvadertopia, have been deleted by moderators.
by Unibot » Thu May 28, 2009 5:46 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Stash Kroh » Thu May 28, 2009 5:49 am
by Unibot » Thu May 28, 2009 5:50 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Bears Armed » Thu May 28, 2009 6:27 am
by Urgench » Thu May 28, 2009 6:33 am
by Absolvability » Thu May 28, 2009 6:46 am
Urgench wrote:O.O.C. Considering that to reach quorum is to have succeeded in having a resolution passed these days, what's to stop this badge from being misused ? OK so it might not end up being taken very seriously that the world assembly doesn't like you that much but still badges of honor might end up being parcelled out among an in crowd, and badges of disgrace to those who by dint of being nothing more than unpopular have earned the displeasure of the "festering snake pit" ( as I believe Palentine would have us all call it in perpetuam ) ?
by Sydia » Thu May 28, 2009 6:46 am
Bears Armed wrote:*(wonders how long it will be before the first nation tries to condemn itself)*
by Quintessence of Dust » Thu May 28, 2009 6:48 am
by Absolvability » Thu May 28, 2009 6:52 am
Sydia wrote:Could be interesting. For clarification, what activities are acceptable/unacceptable for giving out commendations and condemnations?
by Allanea » Thu May 28, 2009 6:53 am
by Ardchoille » Thu May 28, 2009 7:00 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:Sorry, it must seem like I'm trying to rules-lawyer this innovation into the ground; I'm not, I'm just concerned about how the rules will change.
Rules for Proposals wrote:MetaGaming
MetaGaming is a difficult to understand category at times, especially since it often shares jurisdiction with Game Mechanics violations. Essentially, a MetaGaming violation is one that breaks "the fourth wall", or attempts to force events outside of the WA itself. Proposals dealing with Regions, with other nations, Moderators, and requiring activities on the Forums are examples. This also includes Proposals that try to affect non-WA nations.
Branding
Limited branding is allowed. "Limited" means that you may list one co-author by nation name only. Example:
"Co-authored by The Most Glorious Hack"
Further branding will result in the Proposal being deleted. Don't list everyone who posted in the thread for your draft, don't list yourself, don't list your Minister Of Making Proposals, and don't post the 'pre-title' of the co-author (ie: "The Republic Of..."). This includes creating nations that have the same name as your region or group and using them to promote your region or group.
Category: Condemn. Strength: MildRECOGNISING that most nations in the Region of Theocracies refuse to fund secular education, and
NOTING that most of its member nations have failed to implement any WA human rights resolutions, and
APPALLED at the spelling of the documents in which they offensively declare their stubborn rejection of these noble aims, the World Assembly:
1. Condemns the Region of Theocracies
2. Declares that all nations within said region will be subject to an Official Outraged Communication from the Secretariat.
3. Exempts the nation of Goodygoody, which has been exemplary in its compliance with WA resolutions.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement