i already called it a couple dozen pages ago, I'm just (1) easily risen (2) bored
Advertisement
by Hydesland » Tue May 24, 2016 10:01 am
Lamadia II wrote:
I lost my password for my first account. It was this, or use an account which was entirely RP which does not fit my own political views. So, tbh, no, you are not getting trolled, I just made a new account.
by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 24, 2016 10:02 am
Lamadia II wrote:
No, sweethard, the Unions were trying to destroy this country, using their unfair control over the ability to generate electricity to force a series of successive weak governments, Labour & Conservative, to push through their hideous demands. Thank God we got a Prime Minister in 1979 who, after carefully negotiating around the first strike of her term, managed to crush the unions. Bring the mad dogs under control.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Wolfmanne2 » Tue May 24, 2016 10:03 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Lamadia II » Tue May 24, 2016 10:03 am
by Geilinor » Tue May 24, 2016 10:04 am
Lamadia II wrote:
No, sweethard, the Unions were trying to destroy this country, using their unfair control over the ability to generate electricity to force a series of successive weak governments, Labour & Conservative, to push through their hideous demands. Thank God we got a Prime Minister in 1979 who, after carefully negotiating around the first strike of her term, managed to crush the unions. Bring the mad dogs under control.
by Wolfmanne2 » Tue May 24, 2016 10:05 am
Lamadia II wrote:Hydesland wrote:
You seem like a troll regardless.
Because I contrast to the hideous socialist, left-wing views held by most people of this game, which will never find their way back into mainstream UK politics due to the sheer stupidity of the majority of mainstream politicians who hold them, and the idiocy of the ideas themselves, it does not make me a 'troll'.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Questers » Tue May 24, 2016 10:07 am
by Geilinor » Tue May 24, 2016 10:08 am
Questers wrote:Burnham 2020
edit: before i have to say it there are obvious reasons why this is not a totally serious post
by Hydesland » Tue May 24, 2016 10:08 am
Lamadia II wrote:Hydesland wrote:
You seem like a troll regardless.
Because I contrast to the hideous socialist, left-wing views held by most people of this game, which will never find their way back into mainstream UK politics due to the sheer stupidity of the majority of mainstream politicians who hold them, and the idiocy of the ideas themselves, it does not make me a 'troll'.
by Lamadia II » Tue May 24, 2016 10:08 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Lamadia II wrote:Because I contrast to the hideous socialist, left-wing views held by most people of this game, which will never find their way back into mainstream UK politics due to the sheer stupidity of the majority of mainstream politicians who hold them, and the idiocy of the ideas themselves, it does not make me a 'troll'.
Well you're right, to a degree, there. But if you think the Conservatives will survive the test of time, you're wrong. The Blairites will take back Labour and you can kiss electoral success good-fucking-bye.
by Wolfmanne2 » Tue May 24, 2016 10:09 am
Lamadia II wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:Well you're right, to a degree, there. But if you think the Conservatives will survive the test of time, you're wrong. The Blairites will take back Labour and you can kiss electoral success good-fucking-bye.
Absolutely not. Labour has almos t crippled its reputaon- it elected a socialist leader, people are not aware that it lurks below the surface. Corbyn may not make it, but, if a man like Burnham or Chuka Umunna comes to power, I still highly doubt the reputation of the Party will recover enough before 2020.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Questers » Tue May 24, 2016 10:09 am
it will if you lot keep destroying the fucking countryLamadia II wrote:Wolfmanne2 wrote:Well you're right, to a degree, there. But if you think the Conservatives will survive the test of time, you're wrong. The Blairites will take back Labour and you can kiss electoral success good-fucking-bye.
Absolutely not. Labour has almos t crippled its reputaon- it elected a socialist leader, people are not aware that it lurks below the surface. Corbyn may not make it, but, if a man like Burnham or Chuka Umunna comes to power, I still highly doubt the reputation of the Party will recover enough before 2020.
by Wolfmanne2 » Tue May 24, 2016 10:10 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.
by Imperializt Russia » Tue May 24, 2016 10:10 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Lamadia II » Tue May 24, 2016 10:10 am
Hydesland wrote:Lamadia II wrote:Because I contrast to the hideous socialist, left-wing views held by most people of this game, which will never find their way back into mainstream UK politics due to the sheer stupidity of the majority of mainstream politicians who hold them, and the idiocy of the ideas themselves, it does not make me a 'troll'.
Because you're too close to a stereotype to seem real.
by Souseiseki » Tue May 24, 2016 10:10 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Hydesland wrote:
You seem like a troll regardless.
I dunno. There are Tories genuinely like Lamadia. Although she is more hyperbolic than fucking Alyakia, so I have my doubts. I mean, has she read up on the French Revolution, because she almost seems like a direct clone of Marie Antoinette.
by Questers » Tue May 24, 2016 10:10 am
by Elepis » Tue May 24, 2016 10:11 am
Lamadia II wrote:Questers wrote: Tories have an obsession with envy.
I think this is strange. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I am a Yorkshireman, if for some reason you think I am going to be envious of anyone for their home or identity then you quite clearly know nothing about Yorkshire.
But again it's a strange obsession. Maybe because you're all so materialistic? Do you really think the striking miners were part of a "politics of envy?"
Politics of laziness, actually.
Most miners, I am sure were very hardworking, and did not want to strike. Most, I am sure, were manipulated by the greedy, greedy unions.
by Questers » Tue May 24, 2016 10:11 am
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Questers wrote: well he's doing the mayor thing or whatever
if not then sure
but i think benn is a more likely choice (and probs better)
Benn's not going to be standing. That's the goss. Likely Eagle will try a challenge in the first coup (the unwinnable one), Jarvis will try play for one he can win.
by Lamadia II » Tue May 24, 2016 10:13 am
Elepis wrote:Lamadia II wrote:Politics of laziness, actually.
Most miners, I am sure were very hardworking, and did not want to strike. Most, I am sure, were manipulated by the greedy, greedy unions.
I just cannot fathom the idiocy of this ^ post. Really? You actually, seriously think that the mine closures were good and the strikes were evil?
I would ask if you had been to the N.E or Wales but then I realized
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Attempted Socialism, Bovad, Dakran, Elejamie, Evpolitia, Heldervin, Lycom, The Xenopolis Confederation, Umeria
Advertisement