Ifreann wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Taking a page from Bob McCullough's playbook, deliberately throwing a case to get one of their own off the hook. By charging the asshole with Murder 1, they're guaranteeing that sufficient standards will not be met (with coverups, leaks and destruction of evidence if needs be) and so a jury will fail to convict.
Or they think they have a case for murder 1.
It would be great if they did, but I'm not holding my breath.