by PurgatoryHell » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:17 pm
by Sedgistan » Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:41 am
"What socialistic nonsense," retorts Finance Minister @@RANDOMNAME@@, taking a break from scowling at jobless protesters. "That food price shock wasn't because of too little government meddling. The real cause was bad planning, a side-effect of half-baked subsidies. The market is smarter than a bunch of bureaucrats, so we should cut all subsidies propping up enterprises that don't turn a real profit. And if some people still can't find bread, then let them eat cake."
by Harkback Union » Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:46 am
by PurgatoryHell » Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:01 am
by Harkback Union » Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:09 am
by PurgatoryHell » Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:18 am
by PurgatoryHell » Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:29 am
by Valrifell » Fri Jul 31, 2015 8:14 pm
by PurgatoryHell » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:18 pm
by Minoa » Sat Aug 01, 2015 1:34 pm
by Valrifell » Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:03 pm
PurgatoryHell wrote:You obviously don't get it. No single Issue should knock out 9,500 Trillion from a GDP
by PurgatoryHell » Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:15 pm
by PurgatoryHell » Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:20 pm
Minoa wrote:Hi,
What option number did you choose in #443? I can do something to warn others against choosing that option by adding it to my wiki issues database.
Sadly, issue effects are not reversible as far as I know.
by PurgatoryHell » Sat Aug 01, 2015 10:28 pm
by Harkback Union » Sat Aug 01, 2015 11:24 pm
Valrifell wrote:The guy is clearly an advocate for less-government intervention. "The market is smarter than a bunch of bureaucrats," So he's going to think ALL subsidized businesses are not profitable. Honestly, just spend one second thinking about who is advocating what option and what it could possibly mean for the nation instead of reading one sentence and assuming "Yeah! That totally isn't going to have a negative consequence!" And you won't have a problem.
by Kesshite » Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:18 am
Harkback Union wrote:But from 100 to 0?
by Valrifell » Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:17 pm
PurgatoryHell wrote:For 11 years I have understood how to build an economy. I get it way more than you do. This issue is just plain wrong. The results are back asswards. Youre not doing anything but arguing so I'm going to ask you to stop posting on this thread.
I'm trying to get a problem with an issue fixed. Not get lambasted by a complete fool.
by Valrifell » Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:20 pm
Harkback Union wrote:Valrifell wrote:The guy is clearly an advocate for less-government intervention. "The market is smarter than a bunch of bureaucrats," So he's going to think ALL subsidized businesses are not profitable. Honestly, just spend one second thinking about who is advocating what option and what it could possibly mean for the nation instead of reading one sentence and assuming "Yeah! That totally isn't going to have a negative consequence!" And you won't have a problem.
So the Issue basically does something different then it says? Are we supposed to do psychoanalysis on Imaginary people in the issues now based on the half line of text they have to say?
What would have made sense if this issue decreases subsidies at a similar rate other issues increase it.
by PurgatoryHell » Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:18 pm
Valrifell wrote:PurgatoryHell wrote:You obviously don't get it. No single Issue should knock out 9,500 Trillion from a GDP
You don't get it. It's the way you set up the economy. Obviously, with an economy as reliant as yours, it will start to crumble if even a few are removed. A purely free market capitalistic nation wouldn't get the same effect.
by Torsiedelle » Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:22 pm
by Luna Amore » Sun Aug 02, 2015 8:25 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Having said all that, you've got a relatively high level of economic freedoms, which should keep your economy fairly strong. There's a slight disjoint in representing this on the trend graph as a result of some changes from the refactoring a while ago. I've brought it up with the admins again, to see if it can be resolved.
Torsiedelle wrote:I was also pretty much screwed over by this.
I've been building my economy back up since then. It's painfully slow, but I'm sure I can get it back up with time.
by PurgatoryHell » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:19 pm
by Kingdinium » Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Pingu 2nd
Advertisement