Ardoki wrote:Marcurix wrote:
That would be because you're not really getting what I'm saying, or deliberately choosing to ignore it.
Does the number of Britsh soldiers matter? Yes. Did I say that excused the civilians deaths? No.
What I did say was that it pointed to a different use of tactics and such, that disputed your initial claim of lesser evil.
This comes from you taking percentages and asserting something that ignores a range of factors in what was a complex conflict.
The tactics (means) are irrelevant, what is of more importance is the end result.
Marc, you're right. This guy is hilarious. We're talking about a goddamn war here, pretty fucking sure. Did you just ACTUALLY fucking say tactics are IRRELEVANT while discussing a WAR?
Ontop of just obscenely wrong that is, i mean, i have a massive ancient ass book called The Art of War in my home if you'd like to borrow it, just incase you really think that still. But, it does matter.
Infact. Name a war. Any war. I can tell you which side was evil based on their motives, used tactics, and the result of them.