Pierconium wrote:I did miss that somehow considering that AMOM is not a member of the New Pacific Order but was instead included in the Senate of the NLO, which was a wholly different construct, which many here have labelled as a 'sub-Senate' or colonial state. To attempt to claim that the NLO spoke for the NPO after the fact reeks of revisionism.
I make no apologies for the actions of the NPO but I do acknowledge that some parties may have made judgement errors in their associations and that this is being handled internally. That said, AMOM has not spoken on behalf of The Pacific for a very long time now and likely will not in the foreseeable future.
In his self-declaration as "Emperor" of the NLO, A mean old man referred to himself as "recently-reinstated Senator of the New Pacific Order." Are you stating that he was lying?
Something in this thread reeks of revisionism, all right. Even without AMOM's contribution, former Regent Feux couldn't have been more involved in this. Please stop trying to pretend the NPO is not responsible and isn't to be held accountable for this; you are responsible and should be held accountable.