Proof ?
Advertisement
by -The Trade Federation- » Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:18 pm
by Soselo » Thu Jan 08, 2015 9:55 pm
by Freemopia » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:41 am
by Sebastianbourg » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:51 am
Freemopia wrote:Break your sex obsession
1. What do you like to do for fun besides sexual things? Good.
What else do you like to do besides sexual things? Good.
Other fun things you can do besides sex are eat delicious fruit/healthy food, dance, sing, make music, listen to music, swim, exercise, socialize, party, dance party, grow food, garden, design, draw, watch funny or educational shows/videos, adopt/pet animals, build houses, make soap, make water filters, do a job that you like, learn how to make things you want, help others, give to the poor, make world peace, religion, pray.
If you could do any non sexual thing what would you do?
If you can have any non sexual thing, what would you want?
what is your life goal?
what kind of life do you want?
learn how to make products you want, ask for what you want, how to trade for things they want,
2. Get realistic heated sex robot doll
3. turn gay
4. chop off ball and dick
5. kill yourself
6. get vasectomy
If you have sex with a prostitute, you could get painful incurable stds and impregnate her resulting in being forced to pay $1000+ per month child support for 18+years (that's $216,000), if it's twins it's double, plus be forced to change dirty diapers, baby pees on your face, screams all night you get no sleep, or else you go to jail for child abuse/neglect.
reportedly
contraception/condom fails 1 out of 33 times you have sex.
1 in 4 teen girl has at least one std
1 in 5, age 15-55, have at least one std.
1/2 of sexually active youth get an std by age 25.
1/2 people with stds are 15-24 (25% of all people)
99% of prostitutes are sex slaves, do it out of desperation as a last resort to feed them self and/or their pimp beats them and steals their $.
The prostitute does not want to have sex, they just want $.
Paying someone to have sex is wrong.
by Threlizdun » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:22 am
How so?Soselo wrote:I support the sex supposing you've not paid for it. It's unethical for prostitutes to charge a fee for their work.
by Soselo » Sat Jan 10, 2015 9:57 am
by Eleanor Ritas » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:09 am
Freemopia wrote:
2. Get realistic heated sex robot doll
3. turn gay
4. chop off ball and dick
5. kill yourself
6. get vasectomy
by Second Blazing » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:11 am
by Arkolon » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:17 am
Soselo wrote:I support the sex supposing you've not paid for it. It's unethical for prostitutes to charge a fee for their work.
by Fralinia » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:18 am
John Rawls wrote:Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory, however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust.
Che Guevera wrote: At a given moment it appears that there may have been a great commotion and a single great change. But that change has been gestating among men day by day, and sometimes generation by generation.
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:10 am
Eleanor Ritas wrote:To preface, let me say that one of the foul stains upon sex tourism is child sex tourism, and I am explicitly condemning that. Where I use the phrase "Sex Tourism" in the title and OP, it refers to travel to places where adult prostitutes are available with less or no interference from law enforcement. I'm talking about places where there's a police officer at the door to the brothel, and Federales walk calmly between the pimps, cradling an FN-FAL full of 7.62 NATO, and watching the girls work.
That said, there are places where prostitution is more or less either legal or decriminalized. In some rural counties of Nevada, there are licensed brothels, and some few gentlemen do travel from out of state to go to one. Of course, there's Amsterdam (which I'm told is pulling back on legal prostitution). There's the Phillipines and Thailand.
And some people, generally men, travel to these places to get laid. What do you think of that?
Personally, I think if everyone involved consents to it (a hard thing to guarantee in a severely economically depressed country), I don't have a problem with it.
What about you?
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:08 pm
by Soselo » Sat Jan 10, 2015 1:52 pm
Fralinia wrote:Soselo wrote:Doing anything for a wage is complicity to a broken economic system. Hence, hookers ought to please me for free and none need pay.
As much as this train of thought appeals to me, I think we're discussing the idea of prostitution within the sentence of a work-wage fractional-reserve banking you-heartless-capitalist-style system, without possibility of revolution, for the sake of argument.
Personally, I see no problem with people who are willing to offer services for money receiving said money, so long as its regulated and we make sure that everyone offering those services is doing so of their own free will.
by Nord Amour » Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:19 pm
by Breko » Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:21 pm
by Wisconsin9 » Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:24 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Eleanor Ritas wrote:To preface, let me say that one of the foul stains upon sex tourism is child sex tourism, and I am explicitly condemning that. Where I use the phrase "Sex Tourism" in the title and OP, it refers to travel to places where adult prostitutes are available with less or no interference from law enforcement. I'm talking about places where there's a police officer at the door to the brothel, and Federales walk calmly between the pimps, cradling an FN-FAL full of 7.62 NATO, and watching the girls work.
That said, there are places where prostitution is more or less either legal or decriminalized. In some rural counties of Nevada, there are licensed brothels, and some few gentlemen do travel from out of state to go to one. Of course, there's Amsterdam (which I'm told is pulling back on legal prostitution). There's the Phillipines and Thailand.
And some people, generally men, travel to these places to get laid. What do you think of that?
Personally, I think if everyone involved consents to it (a hard thing to guarantee in a severely economically depressed country), I don't have a problem with it.
What about you?
If I were to walk through the streets and see that sort of thing happening, I might get traumatised.
It sounds very unsightly, kind of disturbing, and just feels wrong.
by Breko » Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:24 pm
Nord Amour wrote:So long as all of the participants are sober, consenting adults, I can see no logical reason for the government to criminalize it, much less attempt to actively patrol it.
by CTALNH » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:19 am
Teemant wrote:I disapprove this.
by Galmarch » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:24 am
by Republic of Coldwater » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:44 am
Advertisement
Advertisement