Blatent Trolling/Flameblaiting in Moral Dilemma #128

[Dejanic]

The morally correct thing to do is to kill the loved one. I would hope that that is what I would do but I'm not sure if it came to it that I would be strong enough.

No, the morally correct thing is to kill the five people, because who gives a fuck who they are? Peasants are never worth saving.

That is more loved ones grieving.

There is no win in this situation only a loss that can be painful to you (and your family) or the families of people simply struck down in their prime.

Oh, there's a win situation here. Running over peasants doesn't change much as long as you still have the person closer to you.

Even if it was, say, 100 people you didn't know?

Yes, and for one good reason: Who the fuck are you people? No one important to me. *proceed whistling while speeding up the train*

Yeah, grieve all you want, just don't grieve in my general area, or I'll tie you down on the train track.

Some vile shit right there.

[NERVUN]

It's a moral dilemma... obviously he ranks low on he scale, but he's not trolling in those.

[Dejanic]

It's a moral dilemma... obviously he ranks low on he scale, but he's not trolling in those.

He's referring to all others as "peasents", and actually seems to take a thrill in the idea of killing strangers.

"Who the fuck are you people? No one important to me. *proceed whistling while speeding up the train*

"or I'll tie you down on the train track."

I'd like a second opinion on this, he's clearly gone past the moral dilemma stage and is just trying to aggravate/troll people. Do we really want a forum where people can openly express pleasure over the idea of murdering innocents?

[Frisbeeteria]

I agree with Nervun. Not actionable.