My God, did you bother to research any of this stuff at all? Or are you just pulling these out of nowhere? Let's analyse these one by one.
They increased the governmental debt
Actually, no. Tax revenues as a percentage of GDP declined from 18.2% of GDP in 1981 to 18.1% in 1989. Tax revenues as a % of GDP have, however, remained relatively constant since the post-war period. Real federal revenues increased from $599 billion to $991 billion, and real income tax receipts rose from $308.7 billion to $549 billion - increases of 65% and 77%, respectively. So let's leave the ridiculous claim that the national debt increased due to tax cuts at the door, shall we?
enriched the topmost classes while impoverishing everyone else
This is patently false, and indicates massive intellectual dishonesty, and you should feel bad about that. I made this comparison below to show just how much better the economy was under Reagan than it is under Obama, but all the data there is relevant to this thread.
As you can see, annualised GDP per capita growth averaged 2.56% under Reagan. 20 million new jobs were created. The labour force was expanded by 3.8%. Median household income increased by 11.8%. Real disposable income increased by 33.5%. Real per capita income increased by 65%. The poverty rate was reduced from 15% to 12.8%. Real compensation grew by 11%.
So either you're lying to yourself, or you're horribly misinformed. I suspect it's a little bit of both.