Advertisement
by Tule » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:18 am
by San-Silvacian » Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:21 am
by New Visegrad » Thu Oct 23, 2014 5:50 am
by The Kievan People » Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:52 am
by Fordorsia » Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:03 am
The Kievan People wrote:Something that airbursts would really be ideal.
San-Silvacian wrote:Forgot to take off my Rhodie shorts when I went to sleep.
Woke up in bitches and enemy combatants.
Crookfur wrote:Speak for yourself, Crookfur infantry enjoy the sheer uber high speed low drag operator nature of their tactical woad
Spreewerke wrote:One of our employees ate a raw kidney and a raw liver and the only powers he gained was the ability to summon a massive hospital bill.
Premislyd wrote:This is probably the best thing somebody has ever spammed.
Puzikas wrote:That joke was so dark it has to smile to be seen at night.
by Sevvania » Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:23 am
New Visegrad wrote:Personally I think high-calibre, explosive, or multi-projectile rounds would be more effective against zombies. Unless you're a pro marksman and can land a headshot every time, you want something that will actually remove parts of the zombie (preferably the head or legs). A missed small-calibre round will just make a hole and the zombie will carry on, but if you miss the head with a .50 or buckshot it's still going to take a chunk out of it. Zombies don't care about pain or organ failure, but they will slow down if you destroy their ability to walk.
by The Kievan People » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:41 am
Fordorsia wrote:The Kievan People wrote:Something that airbursts would really be ideal.
But then you'd constantly need to change when the projectile would explode as they're shambling towards you.
Besides, is a few small peices of shrapnel really better than a bullet for hitting the brain? Not really. Bullets turn brains to mush.
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:51 am
Fordorsia wrote:The Kievan People wrote:Something that airbursts would really be ideal.
But then you'd constantly need to change when the projectile would explode as they're shambling towards you.
Besides, is a few small peices of shrapnel really better than a bullet for hitting the brain? Not really. Bullets turn brains to mush.
by Spreewerke » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:57 am
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:16 am
Spreewerke wrote:I still think an anti-manual shoulder-braced launching device for metallic-based projectiles would be best for the half-alive deads.
by Spreewerke » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:27 am
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:34 am
by Spreewerke » Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:54 am
Yukonastan wrote:So I think I've -finally- thought of a proper hand gun for Y'stan. Now two more using the same ammo and magazines.
M1911 Yukonastan Pattern, combines aspects of Tokarev TT33, Beretta 92FS/Walther P38, Colt M1911 and Inglis Hi-Power.
Overall design is an M1911A2 CG, but it uses the double-stack magazine from the IHP in a widened grip that accommodates it, firing a :not:7.62 Tokarev (7.2x24mm Northern) round, and holds fourteen rounds in a standard magazine (similar, strangely enough, to a P38/92FS.). It also has an open-top half slide and while it ejects, strips, and functions more like a 1911, it looks a lot like a P38.
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 10:00 am
Spreewerke wrote:Yukonastan wrote:So I think I've -finally- thought of a proper hand gun for Y'stan. Now two more using the same ammo and magazines.
M1911 Yukonastan Pattern, combines aspects of Tokarev TT33, Beretta 92FS/Walther P38, Colt M1911 and Inglis Hi-Power.
Overall design is an M1911A2 CG, but it uses the double-stack magazine from the IHP in a widened grip that accommodates it, firing a :not:7.62 Tokarev (7.2x24mm Northern) round, and holds fourteen rounds in a standard magazine (similar, strangely enough, to a P38/92FS.). It also has an open-top half slide and while it ejects, strips, and functions more like a 1911, it looks a lot like a P38.
A 1911 won't work with an open-top slide. At least not a P.38/92-series-style one. P.38s also only hold eight plus one.
by The balkens » Thu Oct 23, 2014 10:03 am
by Spreewerke » Thu Oct 23, 2014 10:23 am
Yukonastan wrote:Spreewerke wrote:
A 1911 won't work with an open-top slide. At least not a P.38/92-series-style one. P.38s also only hold eight plus one.
I know about 8+1 for the standard P38, notice that I'd expand the grip a la IHP to take a doublestack magazine that's styled similar to the P38/92FS magazine.
Why wouldn't the 1911 work with a mostly open-topped slide? I'd still have the bridge where the barrel locks with the slide, I'd really just have a supermassive ejection port on it, as well as the barrel protruding ahead of the slide.
Unless that makes the mechanism unworkable, in which case it'd be more like an M1911-styled frame (expanded a la IHP for double-stack :not:92FS magazine) with a P38-styled slide and barrel, TT-33 styled ammo, and of course the 1911's safety features and controls layout.
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:07 am
by Spreewerke » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:19 am
Yukonastan wrote:Hm. Short recoil it is then. How 'bout a :not:P38 with dual-stack magazine a la Inglis HiPower and bottlenecked :not:7.62x25 ammo (7.2x24mm), with controls and frame styled to look similar to 1911 (and using :not:1911 grip panels), but with :not:P38 mechanism and slide, with aspects of the design adapted to fit this bastard child with many parents, then?
Edit:(Image)
Of course it wouldn't look as abomination-ey as this does.
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 11:23 am
Spreewerke wrote:Yukonastan wrote:Hm. Short recoil it is then. How 'bout a :not:P38 with dual-stack magazine a la Inglis HiPower and bottlenecked :not:7.62x25 ammo (7.2x24mm), with controls and frame styled to look similar to 1911 (and using :not:1911 grip panels), but with :not:P38 mechanism and slide, with aspects of the design adapted to fit this bastard child with many parents, then?
Edit:(Image)
Of course it wouldn't look as abomination-ey as this does.
So, a Taurus PT92 in 7.2x24mm?
by Erusuia » Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:41 pm
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:53 pm
Erusuia wrote:Would a light weight 14.5mm hmg designed to be man portable for use by airborne forces be viable/a good idea?
by Aqizithiuda » Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:59 pm
Erusuia wrote:Would a light weight 14.5mm hmg designed to be man portable for use by airborne forces be viable/a good idea?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...
by Puzikas » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:12 pm
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Yukonastan » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:13 pm
Erusuia wrote:Would a light weight 14.5mm hmg designed to be man portable for use by airborne forces be viable/a good idea?
by Azurg » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:29 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Middle Green Irthistan, Neu Amerikaner Staaten
Advertisement