Gamingland wrote:Person012345 wrote:Gamingland wrote:Person012345 wrote:Gamingland wrote:Person012345 wrote:Gamingland wrote:However, THERE IS METHANE IN THE PERMAFROST IN SIBERIA, ALASKA AND OTHER REGIONS. WHAT HAPPENED TO VENUS WILL NOT HAPPEN TO US- but we WILL ENTER A FEEDBACK LOOP and it WILL BE a catastrophe.
Unfortunately for your statement, that is what happened to Venus, they think. It entered a positive feedback loop, boiled off it's oceans, and became what it is now. I don't believe that any climate scientist thinks that will happen to earth.
It will happen... (Please, Person012345... Open your eyes...!) THERE IS METHANE IN THE PERMAFROST. There WILL BE A FEEDBACK LOOP, albeit not as catastrophic as venus.
Would you care to source that? I'll accept a pro-agw source, as long as it's not deliberately and obviously alarmist.
The show "Earth 2100" sums it up pretty well. I can fetch you more proof.
A dramatised TV show is not a reliable source.
This does not say there will be a positive feedback loop leading to catastrophic consequences.and also this: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... rming.html
This a. doesn't source that particular claim (as far as I see).
I'm not saying there is no positive feedback, but a positive feedback loop is self perpetuating and only gets worse. Or that's how I understand it. It ends up until things are removed so that there is no more positive fedback.
http://www.earthemergency.org/actionear ... -loops.php
Then this. I can fetch you all the proof on the web if you need it.
I'm sorry, that does not support your argument. The examples given all keep happening until the thing causing the loop is destroyed. Which is what I'm saying, no climate scientists thinks that earth will become like that as far as I know.