Then, Sir or M´am or Intersex person, you are mistaken.
Advertisement
by The Count of Monte Cristo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:51 am
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:52 am
Lyttenburg wrote:Grenartia wrote:How is it relevant to this discussion, and how is it any of your business? If you can give any reasonable answer to either one of your questions, I'll answer, but until then, I don't have to say a damn word.
You know, you could just answer me some posts ago without being so cagey, which, naturally, raises some suspicions. But, okay, if you don't wan't to answer in front of the forum just TG me. I give my word, that won't repost the answer to public.
by Distruzio » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:52 am
by Neutraligon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:52 am
by Lyttenburg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:55 am
Grenartia wrote:
I know, right? Its like they're not even fucking trying.
Grenartia wrote:Lyttenburg, come back when you're capable of making and/or willing to make serious, valid arguments that don't lead to threadjacking. I might not live long enough to see it, but I'll make sure to leave provisions in my will so that my descendents will be able to.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:56 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Dyakovo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:56 am
Lyttenburg wrote:The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:
Ah, the even smaller minority of hermaphrodites. Why didn´t you just say hermaphrodites ? As a conservative I like older terms and expressions, like "the love that dares not speak it´s name".
Anyway, I don´t think it´s fair that the hetero majority should submit to diktats of political correctedness coming from such fringe groups.
Besides, basing civil rights claims on what you got between your legs makes it vile and improper.
Comte, I may disagree with your attitude to hashish that you've expressed in the book, but here I'm in a total agreement with you.
I'd have more respect for the "Political correctness", if it would really be about "respect and co-existance for all", without "exceptions", "acceptable targets" and "preferential treatment" for the groups with the biggest lobby in the "Western World"
The trouble is - it's just not safe to say such things in such places. Even my attemtps to completely correctly use term "homosexualists" was very ill-received.
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:58 am
Lyttenburg wrote:Grenartia wrote:
I know, right? Its like they're not even fucking trying.
1. How about answering my question? All my qestions are very simple and require just a little bit of knowledge and effort to answer.Grenartia wrote:Lyttenburg, come back when you're capable of making and/or willing to make serious, valid arguments that don't lead to threadjacking. I might not live long enough to see it, but I'll make sure to leave provisions in my will so that my descendents will be able to.
2. Your... descendants?
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:59 am
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Rocopurr wrote:I learned about it as a kid, and I turned out fine. Seems like this is a you problem, not a problem for children. If children were raised that some guys liked guys and some girls liked girls they wouldn't be confused. It's the fact that children are raises to demonize homosexuals that makes them confused by it.
I disagree. Children expect, and need, the complementarity of the sexes.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Dyakovo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:59 am
The Count of Monte Cristo wrote:Rocopurr wrote:I learned about it as a kid, and I turned out fine. Seems like this is a you problem, not a problem for children. If children were raised that some guys liked guys and some girls liked girls they wouldn't be confused. It's the fact that children are raises to demonize homosexuals that makes them confused by it.
I disagree. Children expect, and need, the complementarity of the sexes.
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:03 am
by Neutraligon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:04 am
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:04 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:08 am
by Distruzio » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:08 am
by Neutraligon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:10 am
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:11 am
by Lyttenburg » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:11 am
Dyakovo wrote:There is no correct way to use "homosexualists" as it's a nonsense term. Homosexuality is a sexual orientation, not an ideology.
by Neutraligon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:13 am
by Dyakovo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:14 am
by Grenartia » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:14 am
by Distruzio » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:14 am
by Neutraligon » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:14 am
Grenartia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
My guess is if it is used in the same sense as troll-naming (ie to stop discussion) then yes it probably is.
Actually, IIRC, Moderation's stance on troll-naming is pretty strict, and only applies when your only posts in a thread are screaming "TROLL", and not contributing to the topic in any meaningful way.
by Dyakovo » Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:15 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Forsher, Google [Bot], Turenia, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement