Hello, I'm a poor conservative.
Nice to meet you.
Advertisement
by Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:56 pm
by Murkwood » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:56 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Jumalariik » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:56 pm
by Baxten » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:56 pm
Jormengand wrote:Othelos wrote:I don't think so. They deal with different sets of the population. They might overlap, but they aren't the same.
Also, whether they're the same or different, hating people because they're trans and you're a conservative is just as stupid as hating them because they're female and you're a conservative.Murkwood wrote:Look, this is going nowhere. Let's agree to disagree.
"Look, I'm losing. Let's shut off all potential for rational debate on this subject."
by New haven america » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:57 pm
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:58 pm
So what do you think? What causes us to have the views that we have?
What makes a conservative?
A liberal?
A libertarian?
A communist? What do you consider your own primary value to be? How can we evaluate the better ones?
by Jormengand » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Baxten wrote:Jormengand wrote:Also, whether they're the same or different, hating people because they're trans and you're a conservative is just as stupid as hating them because they're female and you're a conservative.
"Look, I'm losing. Let's shut off all potential for rational debate on this subject."
Thanks for heating the flame war more, with your "I'm losing" statement.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Idzequitch » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Jormengand wrote:Othelos wrote:I don't think so. They deal with different sets of the population. They might overlap, but they aren't the same.
Also, whether they're the same or different, hating people because they're trans and you're a conservative is just as stupid as hating them because they're female and you're a conservative.Murkwood wrote:Look, this is going nowhere. Let's agree to disagree.
"Look, I'm losing. Let's shut off all potential for rational debate on this subject."
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:59 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:
No, I haven't. The poor are generally not welcomed in the Republican Party.
by Jormengand » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:00 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Jormengand wrote:Also, whether they're the same or different, hating people because they're trans and you're a conservative is just as stupid as hating them because they're female and you're a conservative.
"Look, I'm losing. Let's shut off all potential for rational debate on this subject."
If you're looking for rationality, NSG is not the place for you
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by New haven america » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:01 pm
by Jormengand » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:02 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:03 pm
New haven america wrote:Yet again: "Though those two ideals are steadily becoming one."
You seem to have missed that part.
by Quintium » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:03 pm
Thalbania wrote:I noticed something about my views on important issues: they're all left-wing. I don't have any sort of underlying formula to determine my views; I'm only interested in what policies are most beneficial.
Thalbania wrote:What do you consider your own primary value to be? How can we evaluate the better ones?
by Thalbania » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:04 pm
Murkwood wrote:Some people have views against it. Mostly, it's based on religion, but there can be other reasons. Take me, for example. Look at LGBT. Those first three, I agree. However, T gets me. Regardless of the question of whether someone has had his/her genitals amputated, they don't become a different gender, but an effigy of a different gender. Sex is a biological reality, and it is not subordinate to subjective impressions, no matter how intense those impressions are, how sincerely they are held, or how painful they make facing the biological facts of life. No hormone injection or surgical mutilation is sufficient to change that.
At least, that's my view.
Jormengand wrote: Biologically, male and female are defined through physical characteristics. However, unless you wish to operate on me or fuck me, I suggest you divert your attention to the psychological meanings of the words Male and Female.
by Kelmet » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:04 pm
by Idzequitch » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:05 pm
by New haven america » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:05 pm
Jormengand wrote:Blasveck wrote:Can I just point out the ridiculousness of your sig?
Anti-women. Jesus H. Christ we have a winner here.
Oh, we've had better. We had an anti-LGBT pro-communist in the LGBT thread. Say it with me kids: "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
by Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:06 pm
Kelmet wrote:As a center right person I find this title kind of, well bad. Just bad.
Of course a person of the opposing ideology would believe the other side is "Wrong" on everything, that's why there are different ideology's
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Herador, Kaumudeen, Luziyca, Picairn, So uh lab here, Statesburg, Tungstan
Advertisement