I have no idea.
Advertisement
by The Dark Star Republic » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:01 am
by Wrapper » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:18 am
by United States Kingdom » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:21 am
by Sciongrad » Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:07 pm
Lumeau wrote:It warms my heart to know you advocate throwing kids in jail for their own private decisions.
Lumeau wrote:Rest assured, if this resolution passes, the penalty in Lumeau for the conduct I described in my original post will be a monetary fine roughly equal to the cost of a bag of chips, and that our Department of Prosecutions and police will be told to give this the absolute lowest enforcement priority.
MANDATES that nations treat violations of this resolution as criminal offenses, and proceed accordingly.
by Normlpeople » Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:49 pm
by Wrapper » Sun Jul 13, 2014 5:04 pm
Normlpeople wrote:"Ahh, quorum. Despite the "think of the children" debate that I was hoping to avoid showing up at the end, I'm happy I can stop acting on the supporters side of child pornography. I hope it passes though, we don't want a repeat of what happened to Wrapper's previous representative....."
by Lumeau » Sun Jul 13, 2014 8:28 pm
Wrapper wrote: If we were advocating harsh sentences for all people who violated this law, including 13-year-olds who posted these materials, that would be draconian. The mere criminalization of it, without even specifying a penalty, is not.
by United States Kingdom » Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:23 am
by Hakio » Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:53 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Chester Pearson » Mon Jul 14, 2014 6:58 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Free State of New Market » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:58 am
by Hakio » Tue Jul 15, 2014 3:01 pm
Chester Pearson wrote:Could you spoiler that please?
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Vibrant Coconuts » Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:20 am
I'd appreciate it if someone could please offer some examples of both the "private" and "public" transmission of recordings. In this context [clarification 4] I'm not sure I know just what that means.
Thank you.
by Wrapper » Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:41 am
Vibrant Coconuts wrote:A question has arisen during our regional discussion:I'd appreciate it if someone could please offer some examples of both the "private" and "public" transmission of recordings. In this context [clarification 4] I'm not sure I know just what that means.
Thank you.
~ Vibrant Coconuts
WA Advisor to The South Pacific
by Wrapper » Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:49 pm
by Christian Democrats » Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:01 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Sanctaria » Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:09 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:First vote. I voted for.
Christian Democrats wrote:I voted for.
Christian Democrats wrote:for.
by Hakio » Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:24 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by Mundiferrum » Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:19 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:First vote. I voted for.
by Cerlor » Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:46 pm
Bill Cosby wrote:A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice.
Robert A. Heinlein wrote:Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
Aristotle wrote:Democracy is when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers.
by The Conez Imperium » Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:18 am
by The Terran Facist State » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:19 am
by Normlpeople » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:47 am
The Terran Facist State wrote:We can not support this until you rectify this "including the visual recording of nude children primarily for sexual purposes." the use of the word "primarily" will make it illegal for parents to video tape,photograph or similar their young children while they are out running and playing in the nude.
I don't know how it is in your nation, but here it's perfectly normal for weary young children to be nude during the summer.
I propose the rewording to be "including the visual recording of nude children for sexual purposes or pornographic purposes."
Why "pornographic purposes", simple an individual could claim to be straight and not shooting for sexual purposes, that way avoiding the law.
by Sobreva » Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:37 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement