NATION

PASSWORD

Military Ground Vehicles of Your Nation [NO MECHS] Type 6

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will OP the next MGVoYN[NM] thread?

Imperializt Russia
39
25%
Anemos Major
52
33%
Questers
8
5%
Dragomere
21
13%
Dostanuot Loj
5
3%
The Kievan People
22
14%
Oaledonia
12
8%
 
Total votes : 159

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Anemos Major » Fri May 09, 2014 2:40 pm

The Akasha Colony wrote:
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Considering my MBT is armed with a 140 mm gun. In case of constructing a tank like the AVRE what caliber of gun should I mount on it?


The caliber of gun on your MBT is rather irrelevant to the caliber used on your engineering vehicle. They're designed for completely different purposes.


I suppose it could be partly relevant if you're trying to retrofit the demolition gun into a minimally modified standard production turret.

Or maybe I'm just being nitpicky and annoying. :P

User avatar
Premislyd
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10456
Founded: Feb 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Premislyd » Fri May 09, 2014 5:10 pm

Kampala- wrote:
Premislyd wrote:How much elan increase could one get from switching modern armor nomenclature back to cavalry nomenclature?


~22% of existing.


Seems worth it then

Kampala- wrote:http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Gallan_Army

all cavalry army


wow

stole my idea
Just a heads up, I suffer from [insert stereotypical internet illness here], and will use it as an excuse instead of taking responsibility for my actions.
~Transgendered, bisexual, transsexual, metrosexual, homosexual, Japanophile, heterosexual, transvestite asexual and proud~
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing

User avatar
Krasny-Volny
Minister
 
Posts: 3200
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Krasny-Volny » Fri May 09, 2014 7:41 pm

Alduinium wrote:
Kampala- wrote:
yes to both

Ok, time to go oppress liberate various third world countries/USA ripoffs and steal their M113's.


BMP-1 and BMP-3 turrets have also been fitted on M113s before:

Image
Image

And of course, one of the stranger hybrids I've seen: a BMP-2 built on an M113 chassis:

http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/inf/M113/M113A3_BMP-2.jpg
Krastecexport. Cheap armaments for the budget minded, sold with discretion.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25549
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Fri May 09, 2014 7:49 pm

In what world is vis modding for training purposes strange?

Premislyd wrote:
Kampala- wrote:
~22% of existing.


Seems worth it then

Kampala- wrote:http://iiwiki.com/wiki/Gallan_Army

all cavalry army


wow

stole my idea


1) It's not it's infinitesimally small, actually.

2) Yeah I've been doing it for a while tbh.
Last edited by Gallia- on Fri May 09, 2014 7:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Premislyd
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10456
Founded: Feb 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Premislyd » Fri May 09, 2014 7:51 pm

Gallia- wrote:It's not it's infinitesimally small, actually.


22% increase seems reasonable, imo
Just a heads up, I suffer from [insert stereotypical internet illness here], and will use it as an excuse instead of taking responsibility for my actions.
~Transgendered, bisexual, transsexual, metrosexual, homosexual, Japanophile, heterosexual, transvestite asexual and proud~
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Fri May 09, 2014 8:36 pm

Krasny-Volny wrote:
Alduinium wrote:Ok, time to go oppress liberate various third world countries/USA ripoffs and steal their M113's.


BMP-1 and BMP-3 turrets have also been fitted on M113s before:

Image
Image

And of course, one of the stranger hybrids I've seen: a BMP-2 built on an M113 chassis:

http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/inf/M113/M113A3_BMP-2.jpg

The top one is an AIFV /beingAnal
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*

User avatar
The Great Sioux Confederacy
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: May 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great Sioux Confederacy » Fri May 09, 2014 9:05 pm

We only operate a small number of light vehicles, because of our small size and budget. These are principally M151 Jeeps, supplemented by a number of CJ-5/6 civilian Jeeps. Armored vehicles are limited to a few dozen Eland-20s, -60s, and -90s.


User avatar
The Fascist American Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 3101
Founded: Oct 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Fascist American Empire » Fri May 09, 2014 9:10 pm

We prefer to use the T-34 tank in armoured combat, as well as the 88mm Artillery Gun for long distance targeting. Yes, I'm stuck in the 40's, I don't care.
Last edited by The Fascist American Empire on Fri May 09, 2014 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Americans, hands off Ukraine and let Russia do what they will in their own sphere of influence! You are not the world's police!
You obviously do since you posted a response like the shifty little red velvet pseudo ant you are. Yes I am onto your little tricks you hissing pest you exoskeleton brier patch you. Now crawl back in to that patch of grass you call hell and hiss some more. -Benuty
[quote="Arkandros";p="20014230"]

RIP Eli Waller
Race! It is a feeling, not a reality: ninety-five percent, at least, is a feeling. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today. -Benito Mussolini

User avatar
The Great Sioux Confederacy
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: May 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great Sioux Confederacy » Fri May 09, 2014 9:27 pm

The Fascist American Empire wrote:We prefer to use the T-34 tank in armoured combat, as well as the 88mm Artillery Gun for long distance targeting. Yes, I'm stuck in the 40's, I don't care.

Why no 100mm BS-3, considering you already use Soviet tanks.

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 302
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Fri May 09, 2014 9:43 pm

So, how many upgraded T-72m's with 120mm L/44 and ERA does it take to kill an M1A2?

User avatar
Gvozdevsk
Minister
 
Posts: 2338
Founded: Dec 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gvozdevsk » Fri May 09, 2014 10:01 pm

How much troop capacity would putting a BMP-2 turret on an M113 or MT-LB take away? I was thinking they could be a low cost IFV for reserve mechanized formations and/or for use in the case of a mass mobilization.

User avatar
Alduinium
Envoy
 
Posts: 302
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Alduinium » Fri May 09, 2014 10:08 pm

Gvozdevsk wrote:How much troop capacity would putting a BMP-2 turret on an M113 or MT-LB take away? I was thinking they could be a low cost IFV for reserve mechanized formations and/or for use in the case of a mass mobilization.

I plan to use a heavily modernized MT-LB around large portions of my nation, mainly since the terrain in said portions can be best described as 'frozen hellholes'.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Sat May 10, 2014 1:22 am

Krasny-Volny wrote:(Image)

Silly Krasny. That's not an M113.
Kouralia:

User avatar
Krasny-Volny
Minister
 
Posts: 3200
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Krasny-Volny » Sat May 10, 2014 9:51 am

Gvozdevsk wrote:How much troop capacity would putting a BMP-2 turret on an M113 or MT-LB take away? I was thinking they could be a low cost IFV for reserve mechanized formations and/or for use in the case of a mass mobilization.


Probably not that much, though as a general rule vehicles deployed specifically for fire support or other non-carrier duties carry less passengers. M113's normal capacity is 11, right? Means you can carry at least 9 embarked infantry.
Krastecexport. Cheap armaments for the budget minded, sold with discretion.

User avatar
Gvozdevsk
Minister
 
Posts: 2338
Founded: Dec 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gvozdevsk » Sat May 10, 2014 3:07 pm

I'm looking for a tracked IFV to equip my naval infantry. So far I'm looking at the BMP-3M and K21 as the main contenders. Anything else I should look at? Needs to be amphibious, have an autocannon and ATGMs.

User avatar
Sediczja
Minister
 
Posts: 2391
Founded: Oct 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sediczja » Sat May 10, 2014 4:41 pm

Hurray for bland-ass notBRDM-2s!

Image

The PZV (Pansari Zwiady Vozidlo, armoured reconnaissance vehicle) is a Sediczjan light armoured reconnaissance vehicle. Consisting of a thin-skinned hull capable of protecting against small-arms fire and artillery shrapnel and a turret identical to that of the PTR-P, the vehicle is employed in the reconnaissance role. The hull itself forms the basis of many variants, including a mortar carrier and an ATGM platform.
A holy place can never exist without enemies.
I'm not even an anarchist but whatever
DeviantArt
Anarcho-Saxony wrote:The USA was in NATO when the American Civil War happened

Carcelea wrote:WHEN IT WILL STOPS?????

Saiwania wrote:Instead of adjusting my world view to fit more closely with facts, I prefer to try to force the facts into my world view. I've come to my conclusion: that race mixing is bad, therefore I have to do my best to minimize what contradicts that and maximize what supports it. I desperately want the Bible's scriptures to say that God forbids interracial marriage.

User avatar
Casterland
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Casterland » Sat May 10, 2014 4:46 pm

my army has about 45,000 men, 3,900 tanks, and 6,000 ground vehicles. :) :)

User avatar
Gvozdevsk
Minister
 
Posts: 2338
Founded: Dec 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gvozdevsk » Sat May 10, 2014 4:56 pm

Casterland wrote:my army has about 45,000 men, 3,900 tanks, and 6,000 ground vehicles. :) :)

Tanks are ground vehicles so I hope you're including them in that total of 6000 ground vehicles. Also assuming 4 crew tanks and the remaining 2100 "ground vehicles" have two man crews, almost half of your army are vehicle crews. That's not how armies work.

Now if you actually count tanks and "ground vehicles" as a separate thing, assuming the same four man tank crews and two man "ground vehicle" crews, 27,600 of your total army personnel are vehicle crews. That's also not how armies work. If you want to know how armies actually work, check the military realism thread.

User avatar
Macedonian Grand Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2771
Founded: Jan 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Macedonian Grand Empire » Sat May 10, 2014 5:09 pm

Anemos Major wrote:
The Akasha Colony wrote:
The caliber of gun on your MBT is rather irrelevant to the caliber used on your engineering vehicle. They're designed for completely different purposes.


I suppose it could be partly relevant if you're trying to retrofit the demolition gun into a minimally modified standard production turret.

Or maybe I'm just being nitpicky and annoying. :P

The plan is to go with the standard production turret yes.
NSG Senate
Senator Branko Aleksic Deputy leader of the REFORM party

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun May 11, 2014 2:38 am

Krasny-Volny wrote:
Gvozdevsk wrote:How much troop capacity would putting a BMP-2 turret on an M113 or MT-LB take away? I was thinking they could be a low cost IFV for reserve mechanized formations and/or for use in the case of a mass mobilization.


Probably not that much, though as a general rule vehicles deployed specifically for fire support or other non-carrier duties carry less passengers. M113's normal capacity is 11, right? Means you can carry at least 9 embarked infantry.

It actually cuts quite a bit of interior room out. The troop layout of any of the BMP series and also the Bradley are testament to this.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Krasny-Volny
Minister
 
Posts: 3200
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Krasny-Volny » Sun May 11, 2014 12:11 pm

Gvozdevsk wrote:I'm looking for a tracked IFV to equip my naval infantry. So far I'm looking at the BMP-3M and K21 as the main contenders. Anything else I should look at? Needs to be amphibious, have an autocannon and ATGMs.


Why is it necessary to have an autocannon?

BMP-3M's main armament is semiautomatic.
Krastecexport. Cheap armaments for the budget minded, sold with discretion.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun May 11, 2014 12:27 pm

Krasny-Volny wrote:
Gvozdevsk wrote:I'm looking for a tracked IFV to equip my naval infantry. So far I'm looking at the BMP-3M and K21 as the main contenders. Anything else I should look at? Needs to be amphibious, have an autocannon and ATGMs.


Why is it necessary to have an autocannon?

BMP-3M's main armament is semiautomatic.

The autocannon is probably used against a wider variety of targets and more frequently, which would technically make it the primary armament.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Sun May 11, 2014 12:30 pm

A six pounder gun with a sliding block semi-auto breech, manual loading, would be good for a variety of targets combined with airburst capability.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun May 11, 2014 12:33 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:A six pounder gun with a sliding block semi-auto breech, manual loading, would be good for a variety of targets combined with airburst capability.

57mm guns are perfectly fine as autoloaded weapons.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads