Advertisement
by The North Polish Union » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:29 pm
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Communist Eraser » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:37 am
Ah the magnanimous leader's glorious return! Although I have only recently been a part of our glorious region, it is an honor and a privilege to see the return of one so illustrious.
The North Polish Union wrote:You mentioned Easter Europe's 1000-year history in RL, but not Poland-Lithuania? I am disappointed.
(Not really)
by Communist Eraser » Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:57 am
by Kraszkhyia » Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:51 pm
Communist Eraser wrote:It's not often a 'mere' 25 endorsement region like Eastern Europe has anything relevant to say to a sinker like Osiris, but Eastern Europe (or at least those who support Communist Eraser in Eastern Europe) wholeheartedly supports Osiris' move to adopt Peacezone Theory as part of its governing philosophy.
Even though they are reluctant use the term explicitly, Points two and three of the Guidelines for the Construction of a New Government is consistent with the guiding principle of Peacezone Theory; the freedom for any nation/player to play the game as they wish, without the judgement of any institutional influence of their region dictating what is the 'correct way'.
Understandably there will be many questions and surprises as Osiris charts this new path. Eastern Europe can not speak for Osiris, and each region naturally adapts Peacezone Theory to suit their own characteristics (a comparative analysis would be interesting, but I'm not writing one on a weekday), but I am always willing to provide any advice or contribution should they desire it.
---
I was hoping to write my next update giving a look at what's actually happening -inside- Eastern Europe, which has been lacking in all these posts, but this happened and what can you do? I'm not going to miss an opportunity for a free bump.
by Communist Eraser » Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:37 pm
by Communist Eraser » Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:21 pm
Charax wrote:Which one have you enjoyed doing more (Codger): WZA or EE?
by Communist Eraser » Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:20 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:23 pm
by Evil Wolf » Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:35 pm
Communist Eraser wrote:Eastern Europe is an old and storied region, with an existence that could be traced as far back as 2003. It was once a successful roleplaying region, but fell into decline and forced to be a battlefield to be ravished between raiders and defenders.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Communist Eraser » Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:20 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:Its boring, so yes.
by Communist Eraser » Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:30 pm
by Communist Eraser » Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:50 am
<Ceraser> ...and I've done it! I have reconciled Solidarity Voting with Peacezone Theory! Peacezone theory is about freedom, but your end goal is to achieve PEACE. How do we achieve peace? AGREEMENT!
Solidarity Voting, a program to encourage everyone to vote the same way is just a means bring Peace...
<Ceraser> It all makes sense. The delegate role in Peacezones. We used to think delegates shouldn't exist. Then we realised it's job is to allow everything to EQUALLY EXIST. We thought the delegate shouldn't vote at all. Then we thought it is supposed to vote the majority of individual nations in some sort of global class struggle. That was a grave cosmopolitan error, a blind insidious alley to (ed: tempt you to) neglect your region.
<Ceraser> No! The goal is to bring about PEACE. Peace through SOLIDARITY.
by Communist Eraser » Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:03 am
Commend Hobbesistan: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 0-11 (100% Against). Overall vote against
Fracking Protocol: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 6-3 (66% For). Overall vote against
Condemn The Dourian Embassy: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 6-3 (66% For). Overall vote against
Commend Abacathea: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 9-1 (90% For). Overall vote for
Repeal "Ethics in International Trade": Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 9-1 (90% For). Overall vote for
Cultural Site Preservation: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 8-2 (80% For). Overall vote against.
Commend Anime Daisuki: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 1-9 (90% Against). Should be 1-10 as one nation TGed afterwards that he was away and missed it. Overall vote against.
Liberate St Abbaddon: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 9-1 (90% For). Overall vote for.
---
Repeal "On Abortion" Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 1-7 (87% Against). Overall vote against.
Commend Blackbird: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 1-7 (87% Against). Overall vote against.
Moratorium on Animal Testing: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 2-6 (75% Against). Overall vote against.
Condemn Cormac A Stark: Amongst Eastern Europe residents, voting is currently 6-1 (85% For). Overall vote against. Currently still at vote
by Communist Eraser » Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:53 pm
Communist Eraser wrote:
Unveiling the curtain - Eastern Europe opens relations with the world
Eastern Europe will now send and accept all embassy request as long as there is one WA member who agrees.
Since our refounding, Eastern Europe has kept a isolationist foreign and embassy policy. Initially it was a simple desire to be left alone after all the struggles with foreign influencers ruining our region; later on while foreign relations were allowed, our interpretation of Peacezone Theory was that establishing in-game embassies was exercising a form of delegate institutional authority which was against our principles.
Following the WFE policy change which saw the option of providing powers to all as an acceptable response within Peacezone Theory, it was felt the same could also apply to embassy policy. All WA nations now has the right to authorise sending or accepting an embassy request, just like if they were the delegate. The only difference is the 'in game noted' delegate is pressing the buttons. The WA qualification is there because one has to be a WA member to be delegate, so even if everyone is a delegate, they still need to be a WA member first.
It is acknowledged there might be conflicts where Eastern Europe accepts an embassy because one member asks for it, even though others disagree. It is better however, that the region works together to sort out any differences arising from giving authority to all, rather than succumbing to giving some and denying others, whether based on "majority vote" or any other system.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement