Advertisement
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:15 pm
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:29 pm
by Lou Sonova » Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:49 am
Kryozerkia wrote:The St Timothy Isles wrote:Is this any good? I just wrote it in an hour and I would like to know any suggestions.HOPING that a better written resolution concerning the above can be drafted by an intelligent country;
It's probably too short, but I would like some tips to make it better.
Here's a tip, since the first reminder seems to have not sunk in: remove that line. If you submit this proposal with that line in it, your proposal will be removed from queue for flaming.
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:05 am
The St Timothy Isles wrote:Can a mod close this forum please? I'll give it up because of the new GA resolution.
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:11 am
by Grays Harbor » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:26 am
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:27 am
Grays Harbor wrote:Draft 2 is slightly* better, however, we still do not see enough "flaws" to warrant repeal. We remain, therefore, completely unsupportive of this proposed repeal.
* emphasis on the slightly. Its is still not something we could support.
by Grays Harbor » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:46 am
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 10, 2010 7:48 am
Grays Harbor wrote:We believe we have made it abudently clear that we support the resolution as it stands, and cannot support any repeal attempt of it.
by Lowell Leber » Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:10 am
by Flibbleites » Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:56 pm
The St Timothy Isles wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:We believe we have made it abudently clear that we support the resolution as it stands, and cannot support any repeal attempt of it.
Okay, you guys did make that clear.
Anyone want to give any positive tips other than Grays Harbor and New Rockport? They would be much appreciated.
by Lou Sonova » Sat Apr 10, 2010 4:45 pm
Lowell Leber wrote:Given that the International Road Safety Act is to us a fine piece of international legislation, I cannot offer any 'positve' comments on its repeal. Furthurmore, I for the life of me cannot see why so many fellow WA nations want to repeal this resolution.
With Regards,
Ms. B. Taylor
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Armed Republic of Lowell Leber.
by The St Timothy Isles » Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:46 pm
Lowell Leber wrote:Given that the International Road Safety Act is to us a fine piece of international legislation, I cannot offer any 'positve' comments on its repeal. Furthurmore, I for the life of me cannot see why so many fellow WA nations want to repeal this resolution.
With Regards,
Ms. B. Taylor
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Armed Republic of Lowell Leber.
by Lowell Leber » Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:03 pm
The St Timothy Isles wrote:Lowell Leber wrote:Given that the International Road Safety Act is to us a fine piece of international legislation, I cannot offer any 'positve' comments on its repeal. Furthurmore, I for the life of me cannot see why so many fellow WA nations want to repeal this resolution.
With Regards,
Ms. B. Taylor
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Armed Republic of Lowell Leber.
Because it's not good.
by The St Timothy Isles » Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:18 am
Lowell Leber wrote:The St Timothy Isles wrote:Lowell Leber wrote:Given that the International Road Safety Act is to us a fine piece of international legislation, I cannot offer any 'positve' comments on its repeal. Furthurmore, I for the life of me cannot see why so many fellow WA nations want to repeal this resolution.
With Regards,
Ms. B. Taylor
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Armed Republic of Lowell Leber.
Because it's not good.
That was a very in-depth and insightful answer. However, could you please review the reasons this resolution is 'not good'?
With Regards,
Ms. B. Taylor
High Commissoner for WA Affairs,
The Armed Republic of Lowell Leber.
by The St Timothy Isles » Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:00 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kahlua, The Ice States
Advertisement