NATION

PASSWORD

Do gays get "easy" sex easier...than straights? If so...nice

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do gays get laid in the shade easier than straights in the...straits?

Yes
65
21%
No
66
21%
Never been studied.
57
19%
I am studying that.
21
7%
I am the other person studying that.
14
5%
There is no Brony Porn, because when Brony's do it, it's always porn. They're horses.
85
28%
 
Total votes : 308

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:06 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random public space, then no.


So, it's a matter of what the RAF Eton-bred boys call a "target rich environment"?

Why does this not happen with straights?

Because there has never been a history of straight people having to skulk around in the shadows of society, resorting to secret arrangements and "cruising spots" just to be able to meet people similar to them.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:07 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
Lordieth wrote:I only have my own anecdotal observations and thoughts on progressive attitudes to go on. It sounds pretty logical to me. I guess you've also got to take into consideration that it's much easier to be openly heterosexual than it is openly homosexual, so if you're forced to act a certain way because you feel you have to, then it shouldn't be a surprise that equal-minded individuals go to places where they can indulge in behaviours they feel often get repressed in everyday life. I don't think it's directly related to homosexuality, but rather societal influences upon homosexuality, and a willingness to accept and embrace ones own identity.


So I need to find some weird subversive counter-cultural "Nicholas Cage in 8mm was trying to do this but never really got there" kind of dark edgy kink vibe?

Like being a high ranking closeted Republican?

There's like twenty reasons that won't work. Thanks a lot, Lordieth. :(


Hey. I'm just a guy with theories. An ideas man. I let other people do the work. ;)
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:08 pm

Right, being compatible with less than 5% of the population certainly means getting sex easier?

I'm sure gay people in rural towns are just loaded with constant sex, especially since it's so difficult to find any other gay people.

*rolls eyes*

User avatar
Independent Wessex
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 103
Founded: Oct 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Wessex » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:09 pm

Your not supposed to have sex out of wedlock.
The mods say I'm not allowed to flame people in my forum sig.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:09 pm

Independent Wessex wrote:Your not supposed to have sex out of wedlock.


Oh shit, am I going to hell?

User avatar
Independent Wessex
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 103
Founded: Oct 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Wessex » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:11 pm

Luveria wrote:
Independent Wessex wrote:Your not supposed to have sex out of wedlock.


Oh shit, am I going to hell?

How do i know i'm not god?
The mods say I'm not allowed to flame people in my forum sig.

User avatar
Mistelemr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 378
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistelemr » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:12 pm

Luveria wrote:
Independent Wessex wrote:Your not supposed to have sex out of wedlock.


Oh shit, am I going to hell?


Yeah dude, I'm sorry but the shirt you're wearing is part cotton, part polyurethane. Turns out, that's an automatic 5th circling.
I occasionally do stuff on youtube, www.youtube.com/users/darecossack

35% Cosmopolitan
78% Secular
66% Visionary
65% Anarchic
74% Communistic
24% Pacifistic
19% Antrhopocentric



User avatar
Independent Wessex
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 103
Founded: Oct 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Wessex » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:13 pm

Mistelemr wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Oh shit, am I going to hell?


Yeah dude, I'm sorry but the shirt you're wearing is part cotton, part polyurethane. Turns out, that's an automatic 5th circling.

Old testemant does not apply to Christians.

Actuary read and learn about the bible before making your self look stupid.
The mods say I'm not allowed to flame people in my forum sig.

User avatar
Yue-Laou
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yue-Laou » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:16 pm

probably

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:17 pm

Independent Wessex wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Oh shit, am I going to hell?

How do i know i'm not god?


How is that relevant to the thread topic?

Mistelemr wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Oh shit, am I going to hell?


Yeah dude, I'm sorry but the shirt you're wearing is part cotton, part polyurethane. Turns out, that's an automatic 5th circling.


I'm not a dude.

User avatar
Mistelemr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 378
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistelemr » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:17 pm

Independent Wessex wrote:
Mistelemr wrote:
Yeah dude, I'm sorry but the shirt you're wearing is part cotton, part polyurethane. Turns out, that's an automatic 5th circling.

Old testemant does not apply to Christians.

Actuary read and learn about the bible before making your self look stupid.


Scuse me, I thought Jesus was the Messiah of the people of Judea... Meaning the Christianity comes out of Judaism, hence the term Judeao-christian ... Yay?

That isn't to say that people can't pick and choose which parts of what they believe in, but I'm fairly certain the big part condemning homosexuality is juxtaposed right before the part of "thou shalt not wear mixed clothes, because god!"

So, remind me when you had any relevance to the thread topic and why you're even in here again, before simply resorting to name-calling and put downs?
I occasionally do stuff on youtube, www.youtube.com/users/darecossack

35% Cosmopolitan
78% Secular
66% Visionary
65% Anarchic
74% Communistic
24% Pacifistic
19% Antrhopocentric



User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:18 pm

Luveria wrote:
Independent Wessex wrote:Your not supposed to have sex out of wedlock.


Oh shit, am I going to hell?


If that's what hell is, sign me up. ;)
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Mistelemr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 378
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistelemr » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:19 pm

Luveria wrote:
Independent Wessex wrote:How do i know i'm not god?


How is that relevant to the thread topic?

Mistelemr wrote:
Yeah dude, I'm sorry but the shirt you're wearing is part cotton, part polyurethane. Turns out, that's an automatic 5th circling.


I'm not a dude.


Everyone's a dude, or no ones a dude. To me the term dude is sexless and gender neutral...

Going way off topic, holy crap.

But yeah, interesting stuff, that gay sex. Are we even allowed to talk about it? I thought these forums prohibited sex talk, though I don't know to what extent.

(Shall refrain from calling you dude in the future, sorry)
I occasionally do stuff on youtube, www.youtube.com/users/darecossack

35% Cosmopolitan
78% Secular
66% Visionary
65% Anarchic
74% Communistic
24% Pacifistic
19% Antrhopocentric



User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:20 pm

Mistelemr wrote:
Huh, I'm trying to think a pathway through this, and I think I figured it out.

It would be incorrect to say that the gay community is by any means more promiscuous, except in nominative terms. What I think this ends up coming down to is that men are generally more sexually driven than women (due to societal pressures more likely than biology), thus, gay men have tons of sex because the man in them wants sex, and other gay men also just want sex, therefore boning ensues. The only way to confirm this would be to see if lesbians have sex less than "breeder" couples, as it would create a standard by which men have sex more than women in purely homosexual relations.

So then, the question becomes not if gay guys get going generally, but if lusty lesbian ladies lay less


"therefore boning ensues" should just be called "the Mistelemr Effect".

"What happened in the laboratory last night?"

"Well, we had just loaded the sample, we accidentally activated the chemical shower, and it was that scene in Ron Burgundy where they bone. The Mistelemr Effect strikes again."

We should study the lesbian thing.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:21 pm

Lordieth wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Oh shit, am I going to hell?


If that's what hell is, sign me up. ;)


An incubus will be assigned to you when you arrive.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:22 pm

DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random pubic space, then no.

Not necessarily. It's very possible otherwise many times, yes.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:22 pm

GrandKirche wrote:
So much wrong with this:

Ok,

1) RAF is not the old Etonians club.
2)It does. Just not all of them. Ditto us boa-wearing, conga dancing gays
3)You need to find the nightclub of last resort.


2) damn, so some of you are having dry seasons, too? Goddamn, no offense, but that makes me feel better.
3) Or build and run it.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15206
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:22 pm

Independent Wessex wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Oh shit, am I going to hell?

How do i know i'm not god?


If you aren't omnipotent, you're not god.
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:23 pm

DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random pubic space, then no.


"If straight people go to clubs it's really easy for them to have sex with other straight people."

Either you're implying gay people have very low standards, or you're implying anyone can get sex at clubs, which is simply untrue.

User avatar
Mistelemr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 378
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistelemr » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:23 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
Mistelemr wrote:
Huh, I'm trying to think a pathway through this, and I think I figured it out.

It would be incorrect to say that the gay community is by any means more promiscuous, except in nominative terms. What I think this ends up coming down to is that men are generally more sexually driven than women (due to societal pressures more likely than biology), thus, gay men have tons of sex because the man in them wants sex, and other gay men also just want sex, therefore boning ensues. The only way to confirm this would be to see if lesbians have sex less than "breeder" couples, as it would create a standard by which men have sex more than women in purely homosexual relations.

So then, the question becomes not if gay guys get going generally, but if lusty lesbian ladies lay less


"therefore boning ensues" should just be called "the Mistelemr Effect".

"What happened in the laboratory last night?"

"Well, we had just loaded the sample, we accidentally activated the chemical shower, and it was that scene in Ron Burgundy where they bone. The Mistelemr Effect strikes again."

We should study the lesbian thing.


Someone needs to teach me how to throw references to this stuff in my sig, I need this so bad.
I occasionally do stuff on youtube, www.youtube.com/users/darecossack

35% Cosmopolitan
78% Secular
66% Visionary
65% Anarchic
74% Communistic
24% Pacifistic
19% Antrhopocentric



User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:24 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
So, it's a matter of what the RAF Eton-bred boys call a "target rich environment"?

Why does this not happen with straights?

Because there has never been a history of straight people having to skulk around in the shadows of society, resorting to secret arrangements and "cruising spots" just to be able to meet people similar to them.


Gay people sound like French Resistance Fighters.

How do I join?

I want my code name to be "Shocolate Mousse", although I can't deliver the goods on all of that.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:25 pm

Luveria wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
If that's what hell is, sign me up. ;)


An incubus will be assigned to you when you arrive.


Will he be holding a sign? Is hell basically like the airport lounge?
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
DrakoLand
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1496
Founded: Nov 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DrakoLand » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:26 pm

Luveria wrote:
DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random pubic space, then no.


"If straight people go to clubs it's really easy for them to have sex with other straight people."

Either you're implying gay people have very low standards, or you're implying anyone can get sex at clubs, which is simply untrue.


There are gay clubs which is exist just for that cause.

User avatar
Mistelemr
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 378
Founded: Oct 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mistelemr » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:26 pm

Luveria wrote:
DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random pubic space, then no.


"If straight people go to clubs it's really easy for them to have sex with other straight people."

Either you're implying gay people have very low standards, or you're implying anyone can get sex at clubs, which is simply untrue.


It's so easy to get sex at a club. You just go up to the bar and order it, and bam, you even get one of those fancy little drink umbrella's.

But seriously, I've never been to a club... Ever.
I occasionally do stuff on youtube, www.youtube.com/users/darecossack

35% Cosmopolitan
78% Secular
66% Visionary
65% Anarchic
74% Communistic
24% Pacifistic
19% Antrhopocentric



User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:27 pm

Luveria wrote:
DrakoLand wrote:If you are going to gay clubs and such then yes. If you don't and wanna find someone in a random pubic space, then no.


"If straight people go to clubs it's really easy for them to have sex with other straight people."

Either you're implying gay people have very low standards, or you're implying anyone can get sex at clubs, which is simply untrue.


See, this is kind of why I thought those guys were pulling my leg on the whole thing, like there was some running joke among gay guys to just pick some random moron in middle America and tell him "We all fuck constantly. Constantly. I'm going to go to the bathroom with that Persian guy over there that I've never met before, take him into the Hookah booth in the back, and then come back with my shirt inside out and say one word: Constantly."
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Catboiistan, Celritannia, Dazchan, Dumb Ideologies, Haku, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ineva, Kaumudeen, Lycom, Monstand, Nova Zueratopia, Pale Dawn, Potatopelago, Repreteop, Shidei, Tarsonis, The Way Sun Cooperation, Tungstan, United Northen States Canada

Advertisement

Remove ads