Advertisement
by NatSov » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:37 am
by The Dourian Embassy » Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:09 pm
by Belzia » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:03 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:09 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 3:40 pm
Weed wrote:I haven't disputed any repeal attempt based on the typo. I've simply disputed repeals that use bad logic. I'd vote for it if it was free of any untrue clauses.
by Weed » Sat Nov 02, 2013 3:51 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 3:58 pm
by Weed » Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:09 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Weed wrote:I appreciate your concerns that I should be doing something other than point out that you rushed this and ignored suggestions in this thread that would have been easy to work around. Luckily, I am and have always been a skilled at multitasking.
by Weed » Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:56 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:01 pm
by Weed » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:11 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:20 pm
Weed wrote:And yes, I about the telegram, even though it was not addressed to the nation you were actively holding discussions with (this one, with links to it all over this thread) but rather to my old nation, the one who wrote the original, which you had to do more work to find. I just now found it of course, because I never log into that nation. But it does give you a certain degree of cover, a pretty clever trick. [EDIT: Though it was sent moments before you actually submitted it, so it did not really give me time to answer the question even if I was active on that nation. It was sent 1 day 1 hour ago, and the automatic TG that gets sent to the author by the game if a repeal is submitted came also 1 day 1 hour ago.]
by Weed » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:28 pm
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:39 pm
Weed wrote:Campaigns aren't hard to run, I have an API key. Because I just missed your campaign and was in fact online (though paying attention elsewhere) if you will do me the favour of adding the words I corrected I swear on my honour and reputation (which is something I very much take seriously, if you cannot tell) I would be willing to run the campaign for it myself [EDIT: and note that as the original author I support your repeal], out of regret that I did not check back sooner.
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:42 pm
Weed wrote:A pleasure doing snarky business with you.
by The Dark Star Republic » Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:51 pm
Seconds ago: The proposal "Repeal "Against Corruption"" was removed from the floor.
by The Dourian Embassy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:04 pm
by Eist » Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:37 pm
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.
by Weed » Sun Nov 03, 2013 1:15 am
by The Dourian Embassy » Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:32 am
Eist wrote:lol it took two of you to draft this?! I hope I could have banged out a better repeal in less than two minutes myself. Your grammar is even worse than in the resolution you are trying to repeal because of its grammatical issues.
You, Dourian et al., have correctly identified that the resolution is flawed, but why you felt that your repeal is adequate to pass into legislation is beyond my comprehension. The missing space before the first parentheses is literally killing me. I'm dying.
AGAINST. If Dourian et al. wants to put a modicum of effort in to this repeal effort, I will happily support it.
by Araraukar » Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:42 am
The Dourian Embassy wrote:See, this is the issue. I've been drafting for over a week before I posted it here, and I posted it here 5 days ago(rather than the 2 you just claimed).
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Retired WerePenguins » Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement