Advertisement
by Valentir » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:53 am
by Geilinor » Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:56 am
Health Card Act
Urgency: Medium | Author: Geilinor [NDP] | Category: Health
Co-sponsors:Placenza(ABP), Varikari Sari(SPP), Ainin(NDP), Valentir(NDP), Divair(NDP)
Preamble
A smart identification card for the universal healthcare system can help reduce bureaucracy in the healthcare system and provide a simple way to access a patient's health records. The use of a smart card will help reduce fraud, provide access to emergency medical information, and make medical records portable.
Section I – National Health Board
1. The National Health Board (NHB), established in the Universal Healthcare Act, shall be responsible for carrying out the provisions of this act.
2. The NHB shall establish and manage a database to store health records and information, which shall be highly encrypted.
3. The NHB shall distribute software that is necessary for the use of its database.
Section II - Aurentine Smart Health Card
1. The Senate hereby establishes the Aurentine Smart Health Card. The card shall allow access to the NHB database.
2. The Aurentine Smart Health Card shall be issued to all registered residents of Aurentina. Patients may apply for a new card if theirs is lost.
3. The card shall be enabled with ISO/IEC 14443-compatible cards enabled with Near Field Communication (NFC) technology, in the size format of a standard ISO/IEC 7810 Credit Card.
4. Health professionals shall be issued a health professional card, which shall authorize access to the card.
5. The cardholder's name, date of birth, date of issue, gender, first four digits of the ID number, picture shall be printed on the card.
6. Aurentine Smart Health Cards shall allow access to the following information:
a. Administrative information, including cardholder status, number of visits and admissions,
use of health prevention programs.
b. Medical service information, including drug allergy history,
medication information, blood type, and history of medical treatments.
7. The Aurentine Smart Health Card shall contain the following security features:
a. Encryption of information stored on the card.
b. Cardholder personal identification numbers (PINs) to protect on-card personal information.
Section III-Usage
1. An Aurentine Smart Health Card or ID number shall be required at the point of receiving care, unless the card has been lost, in which case alternative identification shall be accepted or the requirement may be postponed.
2. Medical practitioners shall update the database after each visit.
Section III - Penalties
1. It is a criminal offence to use another person's health card or ID number or to knowingly allow your card or number to be used be another person. This shall be punished as fraud, which is a delict.
2. A person who sells or purchases a patient's health records shall be charged with fraud.
[box][align=center][size=150][b]Health Card Act[/b][/size]
[b]Urgency:[/b] Medium | [b]Author:[/b] [nation]Geilinor[/nation] [NDP] | [b]Category:[/b] Health
[b]Co-sponsors:[/b]Placenza(ABP), Varikari Sari(SPP), Ainin(NDP), Valentir(NDP), Divair(NDP)[/align][hr][/hr]
[align=center][b]Preamble[/b]
A smart identification card for the universal healthcare system can help reduce bureaucracy in the healthcare system and provide a simple way to access a patient's health records. The use of a smart card will help reduce fraud, provide access to emergency medical information, and make medical records portable.[/align]
[b]Section I – National Health Board[/b]
1. The National Health Board (NHB), established in the Universal Healthcare Act, shall be responsible for carrying out the provisions of this act.
2. The NHB shall establish and manage a database to store health records and information, which shall be highly encrypted.
3. The NHB shall distribute software that is necessary for the use of its database.
[b]Section II - Aurentine Smart Health Card[/b]
1. The Senate hereby establishes the Aurentine Smart Health Card. The card shall allow access to the NHB database.
2. The Aurentine Smart Health Card shall be issued to all registered residents of Aurentina. Patients may apply for a new card if theirs is lost.
3. The card shall be enabled with ISO/IEC 14443-compatible cards enabled with Near Field Communication (NFC) technology, in the size format of a standard ISO/IEC 7810 Credit Card.
4. Health professionals shall be issued a health professional card, which shall authorize access to the card.
5. The cardholder's name, date of birth, date of issue, gender, first four digits of the ID number, picture shall be printed on the card.
6. Aurentine Smart Health Cards shall allow access to the following information:
a. Administrative information, including cardholder status, number of visits and admissions,
use of health prevention programs.
b. Medical service information, including drug allergy history,
medication information, blood type, and history of medical treatments.
7. The Aurentine Smart Health Card shall contain the following security features:
a. Encryption of information stored on the card.
b. Cardholder personal identification numbers (PINs) to protect on-card personal information.
[b]Section III-Usage[/b]
1. An Aurentine Smart Health Card or ID number shall be required at the point of receiving care, unless the card has been lost, in which case alternative identification shall be accepted or the requirement may be postponed.
2. Medical practitioners shall update the database after each visit.
[b]Section III - Penalties[/b]
1. It is a criminal offence to use another person's health card or ID number or to knowingly allow your card or number to be used be another person. This shall be punished as fraud, which is a delict.
2. A person who sells or purchases a patient's health records shall be charged with fraud.[/box]
by The new united britsh empire » Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:57 am
by The IASM » Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:05 am
by Venaleria » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:54 pm
by Osea 767 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 4:42 am
Secular State Act II
Urgency: Significant | Category: Miscellaneous | Author: Osea (CP)
Sponsors: Divair (NDP), Aeken (NDP), Agritum (NDP), Malgrave (MSP), Geilnor (NDP)
Description:.
Recognising that, while the Secular State Act has advanced secularism in our country, there have been misunderstandings regarding it.
Recognising that our nation is better served by the creation of a new version of this act that clarifies matters and improves upon the original act where possible.
Declaring that we must therefore enact a new version of the Secular State Act that will continue to maintain the position of our nation as a secular lay state. Therefore, the following will be enacted and the original Secular State Act will be repealed.
Legislature
- The Senate will be prohibited from enacting any law or legislation that is biased either for or against any religion or stance regarding religion or derives arguments for its enactment from religious texts or edicts
- The Senate will be prohibited from enacting any law or legislation that aims to promote any religion, religious belief or stance on religion
- Members of the Senate cannot be obliged to participate in any religious practises or rituals. They will not be forced to meet any requirements of a religious nature or have limits imposed on them for not meeting them. They also cannot be forced to swear any oaths of a religious nature.
State Institutions- The State will be forbidden from enacting employee policies that are biased either for or against any religious group or those with particular stances regarding religion
- The State will be forbidden from enacting policies in the field of education that aim to promote the views of religious organisations or those with particular stances regarding religious views
- The State can never grant any special status to any religion or religious organisation, such as recognition of a particular religion as an official religion. It will also be forbidden from using the funds of the state to provide financial assistance or subsidies to any religious organisation or organisations clearly centred around either promoting religion or a particular stance on religion.
Culture- Concerns have been expressed by some regarding historical artefacts and buildings. Therefore, it shall be made clear in this legislation that the state will not be able to discriminate in its policies against historic artefacts or buildings on the basis of historic connections to a religion.
- We recognize that governments may decide to supply funds to historical societies and other types of organizations interested in the preservation of historical buildings and artefacts or to create such organizations. Considering such, the state will be forbidden from creating organizations in this area or using funds for support of such organizations if they are biased in regards to any religion or show a particular stance in regards to religion.
by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:06 am
by CTALNH » Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:21 am
by Finium » Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:34 am
by New Bierstaat » Tue Oct 01, 2013 6:31 am
POLITICAL COMPASS
Economic +2.75
Social +1.28
Thomas Jefferson wrote:I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
by Osea 767 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:08 am
by Quebec and Atlantic Canada » Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:31 am
by Kouralia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:30 am
by Oneracon » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:41 am
Kouralia wrote:3) First Amendment to the Internal Security Act - 'any firearm capable of fully automatic fire that has been modified to discharge ammunition in a semi-automatic fashion' Well, how do you specify this? Is an MP7-SF allowed?
4) I would include a section about how no Private Security Employee shall hold authority over a lawful Law Enforcement Officer.
5) I would include a section stating all P/Sec shall be required to carry identification at all times (i.e. an ID badge), and if prompted to present it to a Law Enforcement Officer are required to do so.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Kouralia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:50 am
Oneracon wrote:Kouralia wrote:3) First Amendment to the Internal Security Act - 'any firearm capable of fully automatic fire that has been modified to discharge ammunition in a semi-automatic fashion' Well, how do you specify this? Is an MP7-SF allowed?
4) I would include a section about how no Private Security Employee shall hold authority over a lawful Law Enforcement Officer.
5) I would include a section stating all P/Sec shall be required to carry identification at all times (i.e. an ID badge), and if prompted to present it to a Law Enforcement Officer are required to do so.
3. Yes MP7-SF is allowed, because it is a semi-automatic variant and not a purposely modified firearm.
4 - 5 Both very good points, and if more people echo your sentiment I will amend the bill.
by Sahrani DR » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:33 am
Battlion wrote:I must say I agree fully on points 4 and 5
by Oneracon » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:55 am
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Kouralia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 11:57 am
Oneracon wrote:Points 3-5 have been addressed.
The suggested changes in 4 and 5 have been made, and the amendment on weapons has been removed from the bill due to its confusing nature.
by New Waterford » Tue Oct 01, 2013 12:49 pm
First Amendment to the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act
Author: New Waterford (NDP) Sponsors: Battlion (NDP), Central and Eastern Visayas (Ind), Oneracon (R-G), Britanno (NDP), Mitonesia (NDP)Urgency: Low
Category: Miscellaneous
The Senate of Aurentina:
RECOGNISING the good intentions of the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act,
ALSO RECOGNISING that many religions and religious denominations traditionally perform religious initiation ceremonies on infants,
CONCERNED that said Act, which will be referred to for the rest of this act as the PRFMA, prevents such initiation ceremonies from taking place,
STILL RECOGNISING everyone's right to religious freedom, including minors,
HEREBY ADDS a sub-clause to clause 12 of the PRFMA, which says: "Religious initiation ceremonies performed on infants are exempt from this provision, though said infants may renounce their affiliation with the religious group into which they were initiated once they are physically able to do so."
by Lamaredia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:44 pm
New Waterford wrote:This has enough sponsors for the chamber. I'd like it to be in the Miscellaneous Category.First Amendment to the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act
Author: New Waterford (NDP) Sponsors: Battlion (NDP), Central and Eastern Visayas (Ind), Oneracon (R-G), Britanno (NDP), Mitonesia (NDP)Urgency: Low
Category: Miscellaneous
The Senate of Aurentina:
RECOGNISING the good intentions of the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act,
ALSO RECOGNISING that many religions and religious denominations traditionally perform religious initiation ceremonies on infants,
CONCERNED that said Act, which will be referred to for the rest of this act as the PRFMA, prevents such initiation ceremonies from taking place,
STILL RECOGNISING everyone's right to religious freedom, including minors,
HEREBY ADDS a sub-clause to clause 12 of the PRFMA, which says: "Religious initiation ceremonies performed on infants are exempt from this provision, though said infants may renounce their affiliation with the religious group into which they were initiated once they are physically able to do so."
by Gothmogs » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:46 pm
Lamaredia wrote:New Waterford wrote:This has enough sponsors for the chamber. I'd like it to be in the Miscellaneous Category.First Amendment to the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act
Author: New Waterford (NDP) Sponsors: Battlion (NDP), Central and Eastern Visayas (Ind), Oneracon (R-G), Britanno (NDP), Mitonesia (NDP)Urgency: Low
Category: Miscellaneous
The Senate of Aurentina:
RECOGNISING the good intentions of the Protection of Religious Freedom for Minors Act,
ALSO RECOGNISING that many religions and religious denominations traditionally perform religious initiation ceremonies on infants,
CONCERNED that said Act, which will be referred to for the rest of this act as the PRFMA, prevents such initiation ceremonies from taking place,
STILL RECOGNISING everyone's right to religious freedom, including minors,
HEREBY ADDS a sub-clause to clause 12 of the PRFMA, which says: "Religious initiation ceremonies performed on infants are exempt from this provision, though said infants may renounce their affiliation with the religious group into which they were initiated once they are physically able to do so."
I would suggest that you change it a bit more. Mandatory circumcision shouldn't be allowed because that can be dangerous and harmful for a person later in his or her life.
by Lamaredia » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:51 pm
by Gothmogs » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:58 pm
Lamaredia wrote:Gothmogs wrote:Can I have a source for that?
There's a movie about it.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyat ... an-secret/
Also, there is absolutely no reason to circumcise if there is no potential for harm if the circumcision isn't done.
EDIT: Also, female circumcision has been proven to be very dangerous to the girl that it is done on.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement