Advertisement
by Free South Califas » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:41 pm
by Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:41 pm
Cork Oak Preservation Act
Drafted By: Cengiz Harun (Gothmogs)
Sponsors: Kamchastkia, Yanalia, Free South Califas, Oneracon, The Realm of God, Rumostan
This act outlines the importance of protecting Cork Oaks and restrictions on their harvesting and removal.
Cork Oak trees are of great importance to Aurentina due to their important position in the ecosystem, and their economical value. Cork Oaks help retain water, conserve soil, and take in carbon from the atmosphere that helps reduce greenhouse gases. They also provide habitats for a wide variety of plants and animals, as well as shade and feed for livestock. Cork Oaks produce thick bark which is used in almost all natural cork production, and is harvested by hand, providing jobs for many people. The trees do not need to be cut down for the bark to be harvested, meaning cork is a natural, renewable, and recyclable source. I urge that my fellow senators support this act, as it helps the earth, and the economy.
This bill defines a Cork Oak as any tree of the species Quercus suber.
This bill hereby enacts the following:
Section 1 - Removal
1. It shall be illegal to cut down a Cork Oak unless the said oak is causing endangerment to a persons life, is currently dead, has fallen over, is a danger to existing property, or needs to be removed for necessary forest regulation.
2. Any person who cuts down a Cork Oak will pay a £1,000 fine for each tree that was cut down.
3. A Cork Oak may only be removed if permission to do so was given by the local or national government.
Section 2 - Bark Harvesting
1. Cork Oaks under twelve feet tall or under 18 years of age may not be stripped of their bark.
2. Cork Oaks may only be stripped of their bark over eight years after their previous stripping.
3. Any person who strips the bark of a Cork Oak that may not be stripped will pay a fine no less than £500 and no more than £1,000 for each Cork Oak that was stripped illegally.
Section 3 - Government Powers
1. The local government of a constituency may mark some Cork Oaks as unsuitable to be stripped of their bark, and those trees marked unsuitable will not be allowed to be stripped.
2. The local government of a constituency may give permission for a Cork Oak to be cut down or removed if it follows the criteria in Section 1 of this bill.
3. The local government of a constituency may increase the limits at which a Cork Oak can be stripped of its bark.
4. The local government of a constituency may increase the fine for illegally striping a Cork Oak of its bark, or for illegally cutting down a Cork Oak.
5. The national government has all the powers listed in Article 1, 2, and 3, in Section 3 of this bill.
Hereby passes the Cork Oak Preservation Act
by Pesda » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:43 pm
Free South Califas wrote:Alright, I'll ask my coauthor for consent to post a new version of the animal protection bill keeping it legal to kill insects generally. I'm not comfortable with that, personally, but I'll grudgingly accept it if necessary to establish working law. Why should an adult go outside and stamp on anthills that don't pose a threat to someone's health?
by Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:44 pm
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Gothmogs wrote:The legal guardian of the child would pay it. If they can't afford to pay it, or if they have no legal guardian, then that would be covered by what Ainin said I believe. It's also doubtful someone would try and report an innocent child so they would have to pay a fine.
I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.
by Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:45 pm
Free South Califas wrote:Alright, I'll ask my coauthor for consent to post a new version of the animal protection bill keeping it legal to kill insects generally. I'm not comfortable with that, personally, but I'll grudgingly accept it if necessary to establish working law. Why should an adult go outside and stamp on anthills that don't pose a threat to someone's health?
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:50 pm
Gothmogs wrote:The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.
Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:58 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:01 pm
Gothmogs wrote:The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.
Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:05 pm
by Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:26 pm
Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:43 pm
Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?
by Belmaria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:45 pm
Gothmogs wrote:Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?
We should. I just wanted to avoid the hassle. Also it' more likely an individual bill will pass than one about all endangered species. People will find reasons to be against anything.
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:51 pm
Belmaria wrote:Gothmogs wrote:We should. I just wanted to avoid the hassle. Also it' more likely an individual bill will pass than one about all endangered species. People will find reasons to be against anything.
Protect endangered species but do not force good people off land to do so. Do not fine children for doing what is in their nature. Do not prosecute people for helping beached sea creatures that are endangered, as Americans do. These laws need to be lenient in nature to have a positive effect.
by New Zepuha » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:52 pm
Ainin wrote:"If someone does not have the means to pay a fine, they cannot be handed it."
-Criminal Code
[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.
by Belmaria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:02 pm
by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:03 pm
by Senate President pro Tempore » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:10 pm
by Senate President pro Tempore » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:13 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:23 pm
by Yanalia » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:23 pm
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by Venaleria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:32 pm
by The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:34 pm
by Venaleria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:36 pm
by Geilinor » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:37 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement