NATION

PASSWORD

NSG Senate Chamber [NSG Senate] - Version 3

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Free South Califas
Senator
 
Posts: 4213
Founded: May 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Free South Califas » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:41 pm

Alright, I'll ask my coauthor for consent to post a new version of the animal protection bill keeping it legal to kill insects generally. I'm not comfortable with that, personally, but I'll grudgingly accept it if necessary to establish working law. Why should an adult go outside and stamp on anthills that don't pose a threat to someone's health?
FSC Government
Senate: Saul Califas; First Deputy Leader of the Opposition
Senior Whip, Communist Party (Meiderup)

WA: Califan WA Detachment (CWAD).
Justice
On Autism/"R-word"
(Lir. apologized, so ignore that part.)
Anarchy Works/Open Borders
Flag
.
.
.
I'm autistic and (proud, but) thus not a "social detective", so be warned: I might misread or accidentally offend you.
'Obvious' implications, tones, cues etc. may also be missed.
SELF MANAGEMENT ✯ DIRECT ACTION ✯ WORKER SOLIDARITY
Libertarian Communist

.
COMINTERN/Stonewall/TRC

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:41 pm

Cork Oak Preservation Act
Drafted By: Cengiz Harun (Gothmogs)
Sponsors: Kamchastkia, Yanalia, Free South Califas, Oneracon, The Realm of God, Rumostan

This act outlines the importance of protecting Cork Oaks and restrictions on their harvesting and removal.

Cork Oak trees are of great importance to Aurentina due to their important position in the ecosystem, and their economical value. Cork Oaks help retain water, conserve soil, and take in carbon from the atmosphere that helps reduce greenhouse gases. They also provide habitats for a wide variety of plants and animals, as well as shade and feed for livestock. Cork Oaks produce thick bark which is used in almost all natural cork production, and is harvested by hand, providing jobs for many people. The trees do not need to be cut down for the bark to be harvested, meaning cork is a natural, renewable, and recyclable source. I urge that my fellow senators support this act, as it helps the earth, and the economy.

This bill defines a Cork Oak as any tree of the species Quercus suber.

This bill hereby enacts the following:

Section 1 - Removal
1. It shall be illegal to cut down a Cork Oak unless the said oak is causing endangerment to a persons life, is currently dead, has fallen over, is a danger to existing property, or needs to be removed for necessary forest regulation.

2. Any person who cuts down a Cork Oak will pay a £1,000 fine for each tree that was cut down.

3. A Cork Oak may only be removed if permission to do so was given by the local or national government.

Section 2 - Bark Harvesting
1. Cork Oaks under twelve feet tall or under 18 years of age may not be stripped of their bark.

2. Cork Oaks may only be stripped of their bark over eight years after their previous stripping.

3. Any person who strips the bark of a Cork Oak that may not be stripped will pay a fine no less than £500 and no more than £1,000 for each Cork Oak that was stripped illegally.

Section 3 - Government Powers
1. The local government of a constituency may mark some Cork Oaks as unsuitable to be stripped of their bark, and those trees marked unsuitable will not be allowed to be stripped.

2. The local government of a constituency may give permission for a Cork Oak to be cut down or removed if it follows the criteria in Section 1 of this bill.

3. The local government of a constituency may increase the limits at which a Cork Oak can be stripped of its bark.

4. The local government of a constituency may increase the fine for illegally striping a Cork Oak of its bark, or for illegally cutting down a Cork Oak.

5. The national government has all the powers listed in Article 1, 2, and 3, in Section 3 of this bill.

Hereby passes the Cork Oak Preservation Act

I had to redo all the formatting. I ask that the Senate President pro tempore update the Cork Oak Preservation Act to use this link.
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
Pesda
Minister
 
Posts: 2988
Founded: Jun 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pesda » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:43 pm

Free South Califas wrote:Alright, I'll ask my coauthor for consent to post a new version of the animal protection bill keeping it legal to kill insects generally. I'm not comfortable with that, personally, but I'll grudgingly accept it if necessary to establish working law. Why should an adult go outside and stamp on anthills that don't pose a threat to someone's health?

I'm not saying that and adult should go out and stamp on anthills, but I'm saying that an adult shouldn't go to jail for doing so.
St George of England wrote:
Pesda wrote:Alchohol has a funny taste
So does semen.
Professional Leaders wrote:
Neo-Sincostan wrote:Nah mate I live in Scotland. Or, as I dislike relating it to, the UK.
thats cool i like ireland
Interstellar Britannia wrote:And indeed, cavemen are fully capable of writing books. Have you heard of the Communist Manifesto perchance?
Green Ham wrote:
Pesda wrote:Making someone happy.

I advise lubricant if that's your objective. Or spit.
Kheil HaAvir wrote:i sleep with a poster above
Welsh speaking Plaid Cymru and SNP supporter.
Left -5.75 Lib -6.05
Why I voted for Plaid Cymru
Now a student... In England

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:44 pm

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Gothmogs wrote:The legal guardian of the child would pay it. If they can't afford to pay it, or if they have no legal guardian, then that would be covered by what Ainin said I believe. It's also doubtful someone would try and report an innocent child so they would have to pay a fine.


I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.

Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:45 pm

Free South Califas wrote:Alright, I'll ask my coauthor for consent to post a new version of the animal protection bill keeping it legal to kill insects generally. I'm not comfortable with that, personally, but I'll grudgingly accept it if necessary to establish working law. Why should an adult go outside and stamp on anthills that don't pose a threat to someone's health?

You are right, but this is a societal thing that will probably never go away. I have never met anyone who has not stomped on an ant hill.
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:50 pm

Gothmogs wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.

Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.


:palm: I meant other animals in danger of extinction
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:51 pm

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Gothmogs wrote:Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.


:palm: I meant other animals in danger of extinction


And the bill is about loggerhead turtles.
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:58 pm

Yanalia wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
:palm: I meant other animals in danger of extinction


And the bill is about loggerhead turtles.


Yep, I just realized that :blush:
I mean, some people have beach houses as well.

I don't really have a problem with the fine, maybe it could be a bit higher if the species is in such danger of extinction
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:01 pm

Gothmogs wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
I agree with you mostly, but you cannot expect a parent to be right next to the child 24/7. What if the child is in his backyard and he sees one of these animals? This law should really be a little bit more specific and explain everything.

Loggerhead turtles do not go into peoples backyards. They are sea turtles.


Would this count as cruelty?

Image

Escaping of a tropical island in the style of jack sparrow?
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:05 pm

Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Gothmogs
Diplomat
 
Posts: 588
Founded: Feb 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Gothmogs » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:26 pm

Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?

We should. I just wanted to avoid the hassle. Also it' more likely an individual bill will pass than one about all endangered species. People will find reasons to be against anything.
I started NS on Nov 6, 2011. I accidentally let my original nation die.
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa
Auurentinaaa

Unlucky 13th Aurentine Senator, and Former member of the first NSG senate party, the Left Alliance.
Also, bonobos.

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:43 pm

Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?


I agree completely. It would be inefficient to do it otherwise
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:45 pm

Gothmogs wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Why don't we create a bill that applies to all endangered species, instead of writing separate legislation for each species?

We should. I just wanted to avoid the hassle. Also it' more likely an individual bill will pass than one about all endangered species. People will find reasons to be against anything.

Protect endangered species but do not force good people off land to do so. Do not fine children for doing what is in their nature. Do not prosecute people for helping beached sea creatures that are endangered, as Americans do. These laws need to be lenient in nature to have a positive effect.
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:51 pm

Belmaria wrote:
Gothmogs wrote:We should. I just wanted to avoid the hassle. Also it' more likely an individual bill will pass than one about all endangered species. People will find reasons to be against anything.

Protect endangered species but do not force good people off land to do so. Do not fine children for doing what is in their nature. Do not prosecute people for helping beached sea creatures that are endangered, as Americans do. These laws need to be lenient in nature to have a positive effect.


I agree. This bill should not have more negative effects than positive.
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
New Zepuha
Minister
 
Posts: 3077
Founded: Dec 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zepuha » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:52 pm

Ainin wrote:"If someone does not have the means to pay a fine, they cannot be handed it."
-Criminal Code

So then we have no alternative punishment?
| Mallorea and Riva should resign | Sic Semper Tyrannis |
My Steam Profile (from SteamDB)

  • Worth: $1372 ($337 with sales)
  • Games owned: 106
  • Games not played: 34 (32%)
  • Hours on record: 2,471h

Likes: Libertarians, Law Enforcement, NATO, Shinzo Abe, Taiwan, Angele Merkel, Ron Paul, Israel, Bernie Sanders
Dislikes: Russia, Palestine, Socialism, 'Feminism', Obama, Mitch Daniels, DHS, Mike Pence, UN

[13:31] <Koyro> I want to be cremated, my ashes put into a howitzer shell and fired at the White House.

User avatar
Belmaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Jun 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Belmaria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:02 pm

New Zepuha wrote:
Ainin wrote:"If someone does not have the means to pay a fine, they cannot be handed it."
-Criminal Code

So then we have no alternative punishment?

Death by hamster stampede
-3.5 Economically, -6.2 Socially

Click to Learn Why Trump is a Fascist


Proud Member of the Progressive Movement

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:03 pm

Belmaria wrote:
New Zepuha wrote:So then we have no alternative punishment?

Death by hamster stampede


:rofl:
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
Senate President pro Tempore
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Senate President pro Tempore » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:10 pm

Gothmogs wrote:snip


Done.
Current Officer: David Sloman
Questions/Comments/Concerns? Contact us at one of the following:


senatepresprotemp@auremail.com
(103) 265-3984-991

User avatar
Senate President pro Tempore
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Senate President pro Tempore » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:13 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Venaleria wrote:I'd actually like to point out that the NPWWA and the NPSEA contradict each other on the regulation of standards in a national park.

I'll be supporting New Zepuha's bill over yours. Hopefully the NPSEA will not pass.


This is kind of late to respond to, but ummm...harsh much? :eyebrow:
Current Officer: David Sloman
Questions/Comments/Concerns? Contact us at one of the following:


senatepresprotemp@auremail.com
(103) 265-3984-991

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:23 pm

Senate President pro Tempore wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:I'll be supporting New Zepuha's bill over yours. Hopefully the NPSEA will not pass.


This is kind of late to respond to, but ummm...harsh much? :eyebrow:


How is it harsh? He is simply stating an opinion. There is nothing wrong or against any law in that statement.
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:23 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Senate President pro Tempore wrote:
This is kind of late to respond to, but ummm...harsh much? :eyebrow:


How is it harsh? There is nothing wrong or against any law in that statement.


What definition of harsh are you using that includes the term "illegal"?
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

User avatar
Venaleria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Venaleria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:32 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Senate President pro Tempore wrote:
This is kind of late to respond to, but ummm...harsh much? :eyebrow:


How is it harsh? He is simply stating an opinion. There is nothing wrong or against any law in that statement.


I never said it was illegal.... :palm:
Vice President of Aurentina, representing Lüsen, District 375
Election Commissioner for the Red-Greens Party
NSG Senate Administrator
Ambassador to the Totally Rad Party
Join Sirius. Siriusly.
If you're going to spell my name, spell it correctly. Or you can just call me Ven or Venny.
"Is it behind the bunny?" "It IS the bunny!" -MP

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:34 pm

Yanalia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
How is it harsh? There is nothing wrong or against any law in that statement.


What definition of harsh are you using that includes the term "illegal"?


There SPPT has no power to do anything about comments that are harsh. Thus I ask why he has bothered to bring it up.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Venaleria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Venaleria » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:36 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Yanalia wrote:
What definition of harsh are you using that includes the term "illegal"?


There SPPT has no power to do anything about comments that are harsh. Thus I ask why he has bothered to bring it up.


I bring it up because I ask why the Senator prefers the other bill over mine (not to be egocentric). I had no intention to use my power in order to make a punishment. I bring it up with the same right as any other Senator.
Vice President of Aurentina, representing Lüsen, District 375
Election Commissioner for the Red-Greens Party
NSG Senate Administrator
Ambassador to the Totally Rad Party
Join Sirius. Siriusly.
If you're going to spell my name, spell it correctly. Or you can just call me Ven or Venny.
"Is it behind the bunny?" "It IS the bunny!" -MP

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:37 pm

New Zepuha wrote:
Ainin wrote:"If someone does not have the means to pay a fine, they cannot be handed it."
-Criminal Code

So then we have no alternative punishment?

Community service could be an alternative punishment.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads