Except it is, specifically, restricting the rights of someone to marry someone else.
Advertisement
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:54 pm
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:55 pm
by Euroslavia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:57 pm
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:57 pm
by Singpu » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:57 pm
Singpu wrote...
:o
Translation: utceforp, can ezungal go ahead and goto Farla? Also, sorry if my typing and reading is off noticeably, my eye doctor dialated my eyes, so...
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:57 pm
by Singpu » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:57 pm
Singpu wrote...
:o
Translation: utceforp, can ezungal go ahead and goto Farla? Also, sorry if my typing and reading is off noticeably, my eye doctor dialated my eyes, so...
by Hornesia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:59 pm
by The IASM » Fri Jun 28, 2013 12:59 pm
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:00 pm
by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:01 pm
by Agritum » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:01 pm
Disserbia wrote:Agritum wrote:It sitll means supporting the restriction of those rights.
Which is not the same as restricting them, so stop with the ridiculous accusations. In addition, it doesn't come from a place of wanting to restrict the rights of gay people it comes from a place of that particular person's morals. Which may be a more nuanced view than you would like to admit.
by Regnum Dominae » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:02 pm
Disserbia wrote:Agritum wrote:It sitll means supporting the restriction of those rights.
Which is not the same as restricting them, so stop with the ridiculous accusations. In addition, it doesn't come from a place of wanting to restrict the rights of gay people it comes from a place of that particular person's morals. Which may be a more nuanced view than you would like to admit.
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:03 pm
Agritum wrote:Disserbia wrote:Which is not the same as restricting them, so stop with the ridiculous accusations. In addition, it doesn't come from a place of wanting to restrict the rights of gay people it comes from a place of that particular person's morals. Which may be a more nuanced view than you would like to admit.
Except that it is due to people like those that things like Prop 8 get proposed and nearly put in motion. Someone who is against gay marriages would instantly jump on the occasion to prevent them, I would guess.
And regardless of the motives for why one is against them, the end result is still the restriction of thhe marriage rights of an individual, be it for religious motives or not.
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:04 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:Disserbia wrote:Which is not the same as restricting them, so stop with the ridiculous accusations. In addition, it doesn't come from a place of wanting to restrict the rights of gay people it comes from a place of that particular person's morals. Which may be a more nuanced view than you would like to admit.
Yes, a "morality" which states that gays are inferior and must be restricted.
by Disserbia » Fri Jun 28, 2013 1:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dogmeat, Google [Bot], Page, Uiiop
Advertisement