She's only about an inch shy of five feet.
Advertisement
by Altito Asmoro » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:04 am
Monfrox wrote:The balkens wrote:Just to be clear: michaels feelings for noble are that of a older sister/younger brother thing.
Or a master/servant type.
Sure, Michael has feelings of affection for her, but it's not romantic love. At all.
Unless if page were to take it the wrong way
Makes me wonder who among the squadron would try to make a move on Samantha.
by Monfrox » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:51 am
by Morrdh » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:31 am
Service # 422504 WADDOCK, K.I. Page 1 of 4RECORD OF PERSONNEL - CONFIDENTIAL
for Air Ministry internal use ONLYName: WADDOCK, Kaya Irene Service Number: 422504
Date of Birth: 25th April 19 20 Place of Birth: Longreach, Queensland, Australia
Gender: Female Height: 5 ft. 4 in. Weight: 7 st. 5 lb.
Choose: Male, Female Round to nearest inch Round to nearest pound
Hair: Dark Eyes: Green
Note details and variations in shade/colour in parentheses
Nationality: British Subject (Australia)
Permanent Residence: On Base (RAF Tempsford)
Marital Status: Single (Unmarried) No. of Dependents, [No. of Dependent Minors]: 0 , [ 0 ]
Choose: Single unmarried, Single divorced, Married, Widower/Widowed
Addendum & Erratum: N/A
Date of Enlistment: 3rd July 19 39
Place of Enlistment: Victory House, Kingsway, London
Branch: Women's Auxiliary (Flight Mechanic)
Choose: Regular R.A.F., Auxiliary, Women's Auxiliary, Volunteer Reserve, Medical Services, P.M.R.A.F.N.S., Other (list details)
Rank & Date of Seniority: Aircraftwoman 2nd Class 3rd July 1939, Aircraftwoman 1st Class 7th August 1939,
Corporal 17th June 1940
Date of Separation: - - 19 -
Reason for Separation: -
Choose: Expiration of enlistment term, Retirement, General demobilization, Hardship/Medical grounds, Disciplinary action,
Resignation of commission, Other (list details)
Service # 422504 WADDOCK, K.I. Page 2 of 4UNIT POSTINGS:
- WAAF Depot (RAF West Drayton), 19th July 1939
- No. 1 School of Technical Training (RAF Halton), 9th August 1939
- Maintenance Detachment (RAF Sutton Bridge), 10th January 1940
- No. 319 Squadron Maintenance Section (RAF Tempsford), 4th September 1940AWARDS, DECORATIONS, HONOURS, ETC.:
- Albert Medal, May 17th 1940DISCIPLINARY RECORD:
- 12th February, 1940: Report lodged by the Sutton Bridge Police Force that CPL. WADDOCK had been involved in a
disturbance at the New Inn public house on the night of Saturday 10th February and had been arrested by local
civilian police along with members of the Women's Land Army. After spending the night in a police cell CPL. WADDOCK
was handed over to RAF Police Flight, Sutton Bridge and the matter reported to the Station Commander of RAF Sutton
Bridge. CPL. WADDOCK was 'put on jankers' and Confined to Camp for a period of seven days.TRAINING & QUALIFICATIONS:
- Prior to 1939 received tuition from father in aircraft engines and rifle handling.
- Completed two weeks' basic training at WAAF Depot, RAF West Drayton.
- Completed 18 weeks' Technical Training at RAF Halton.
Service # 422504 WADDOCK, K.I. Page 3 of 4SERVICE RECORD:
- 3rd July, 1939: Enlisted into WAAF at Victory House, Kingsway, London; posted to WAAF Depot RAF West Drayton with
rank of Aircraftwoman 2nd Class, 19th July 1939.
- 2nd August 1939: Completes basic training and promoted to Aircraftwoman 1st Class, effective 3rd August 1939.
- 9th August 1939: Posted to No. 1 School of Technical Training, RAF Halton.
- 13th December, 1939: Completes technical training at RAF Halton, given leave over Christmas.
- 10th January, 1940: Posted to Maintenance Detachment, RAF Sutton Bridge.
- 12th February, 1940: Confined to Camp - see disciplinary record.
- 9th May, 1940: Rescued aircrew from a Fairey BATTLE that had crashed landed following a training flight,
commended for her actions by the Station Commander.
- 17th May, 1940: CPL. WADDOCK awarded the Albert Medal for her actions on 9th May 1940.
- 17th June, 1940: Promoted to rank of Corporal, effective 18th June 1940.
- 4th September, 1940: Transferred to No. 319 Squadron Maintenance Section, transfer effective 5th September 1940.
Service # 422504 WADDOCK, K.I. Page 4 of 4MISCELLANEOUS NOTES:
- CPL. WADDOCK received training from her father, a mechanic in the Australian Flying Corps during the Great War,
in rifle handling and as a mechanic. This was noticed during her service training and instructors stated that she
was a 'gifted' mechanic.
- Observations on physical health (20/7/39) - aside from obvious below average height, Recruit WADDOCK is in
perfect health. There is great reason to tribute her somewhat stunted growth to her background and upbringing,
interview with Recruit WADDOCK reveals that her family was barely able to feed itself during much of her
childhood. It is also understood that Recruit WADDOCK suffered from a number of tropical diseases as a child,
though this has left no obvious negative effect on her life and may even mean she has a stronger immunity to
such diseases which may prove be of benefit should she see service Overseas.
by Len Hyet » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:51 am
Monfrox wrote:I gave Samantha her medal for all intuitive reasons of not having to deal with it immediately before the next OP. This way, it's done. Hope that's all right with you, Tiger.
And if you boys are going to be making a move on Samantha, I hope you bring your A-game.
by Goram » Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:52 am
157126, STANFORD, D.J. Page 1 of 4RECORD OF PERSONNEL - CONFIDENTIAL
for Air Ministry internal use ONLYName: STANFORD, Douglas James Service Number: 157126
Date of Birth: 15th September 19 19 Place of Birth: Maidenhead, Berkshire, England
Gender: Male Height: 6 ft. 0 in. Weight: 11 st. 7 lb.
Choose: Male, Female Round to nearest inch Round to nearest pound
Hair: Ginger Eyes: Blue
Note details and variations in shade/colour in parentheses
Nationality: British
Permanent Residence: On Base (RAF Tempsford)
Marital Status: Single No. of Dependents, [No. of Dependent Minors]: 0 , [ 0 ]
Choose: Single unmarried, Single divorced, Married, Widower/Widowed
Addendum & Erratum: N/A
N/A
Date of Enlistment: 14th July 19 39
Place of Enlistment: London
Branch: R.A.F.V.R.
Choose: Regular R.A.F., Auxiliary, Women's Auxiliary, Volunteer Reserve, Medical Services, P.M.R.A.F.N.S., Other (list details)
Rank & Date of Seniority: Officer Cadet 10th December 1939, Pilot Officer 24th February 1940
Flying Officer 29th November 1940
Date of Separation: - - 19 -
Reason for Separation: -
Choose: Expiration of enlistment term, Retirement, General demobilization, Hardship/Medical grounds, Disciplinary action,
Resignation of commission, Other (list details)
157126, STANFORD, D.J Page 2 of 4UNIT POSTINGS:
CENTRAL FLYING SCHOOL, CRANWELL, 41 SQUADRON, 319 SQUADRONAWARDS, DECORATIONS, HONOURS, ETC.:
N/ADISCIPLINARY RECORD:
N/ATRAINING & QUALIFICATIONS:
-Basic Combat/Flight Training: Central Flying School (single)
- Type qualifications: De Havilland TIGER MOTH (September 3rd 1939), Avro TUTOR (September 4th 1939), Supermarine SPITFIRE (December 6th 1939),
Fairey SWORDFISH (November 1st 1940).
Demonstrated aptitude in gunnery and aerial manoeuvring.
157126, STANFORD, D.J Page 3 of 4SERVICE RECORD:
July 14th 1939: Enlistment into RAF at London.
July 15th-17th 1939: Interview with Aircrew Selection Board; recommended for commission and training; posted
CENTRAL FLYING SCHOOL, effective September 7th 1939
December 10th 1939: Transfer to RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL for officership courses accepted, transfer effective
December 11th 1939.
February 24th 1940: Promoted Pilot Officer upon completion of officership courses; posted 41 Squadron.
May 27th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (1); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 110C - destroyed, over Dunkirk
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (1); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (1) confirmed, (0) probable, (0) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
May 29th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (3); i.: Junkers JU-87, Junkers JU-87 - destroyed, over Channel.
ii. Junkers JU-87 - damaged, over Dunkirk
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (2); ii. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: (1); ii.: Junkers JU-87 - damaged, over Dunkirk
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (3) confirmed, (0) probable, (1) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
June 2nd 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (1); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 109 - destroyed, over Dunkirk
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (1); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (4) confirmed, (0) probable, (1) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
August 13th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (2); i.: Junkers JU-88 - destroyed, over Aperfield
ii.: Heinkel HE-111 - probable, over Biggin Hill
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (1); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: (1); i. damage confirmed by gun camera footage, destruction of
enemy aircraft cannot be confirmed.
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (5) confirmed, (1) probable, (1) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
September 5th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (1); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 109 - destroyed, over Dover
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (1); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (6) confirmed, (1) probable, (1) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
September 7th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (1); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 109 - destroyed, over London
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (1); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (7) confirmed, (1) probable, (1) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
September 10th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (1); i.: Heinkel HE-111 - damaged, over London
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: (1); i.; confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (7) confirmed, (1) probable, (2) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
September 15th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (2); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 109;
ii.: Messerschmitt Bf 109 - destroyed, over London.
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (2); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (9) confirmed, (1) probable, (2) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
September 17 1940: Posted 319 SQUADRON
September 17th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (2); i.: Dornier Do. 17;
ii.: Dornier Do. 17 - destroyed, over Ashford.
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (2); i. confirmed by gun camera footage
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (11) confirmed, (1) probable, (2) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
November 12th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (2); i.: Savoia-Marchetti SM.79;
ii.: Savoia-Marchetti SM.79 - destroyed, over Mediterranean.
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (2); i. confirmed by eye witness
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (13) confirmed, (1) probable, (2) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
November 15th 1940: AERIAL VICTORIES CLAIMED: (2); i.: Messerschmitt Bf 109;
ii.: Messerschmitt Bf 109 - destroyed, near Franco-Spanish border (exact location is classified).
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DESTROYED: (2); i. confirmed by eye witness
CLAIMS PROBABLY DESTROYED: none
CLAIMS CONFIRMED DAMAGED: none
CLAIMS UNSUBSTANTIATED: none
TOTAL AERIAL VICTORIES TO DATE: (15) confirmed, (1) probable, (2) damaged, (0) unsubstantiated
157126, STANFORD, D.J Page 4 of 4MISCELLANEOUS NOTES:
-RECRUIT STANFORD has received limited flight experience prior to enlistment at the controls of a De Haviland
TIGER MOTH (G-ACDJ) at the De Havilland Flying School, White Waltham.
-Observations on physical health (15/7/39) RECRUIT STANFORD is reported perfect physical health, however he is
considered taller than average for a pilot.
-Instructors at the CENTRAL FLYING SCHOOL have described D.J. STANFORD as a gifted pilot with a knack for aerial
marksmanship. This sentiment is echoed by the commanding officer of 41 SQUADRON who has recommended STANFORD
for transfer to 319 SQUADRON.
-P/O STANFORD has been noted to have a painting of an air force officer clutching Adolf Hitler's moustache and
a straight razor on the port side of his aircraft, just below the cockpit.
- P/O STANFORD sustained two wounds during aerial combat on November 15th 1940, during Operation: Taurus.
by Morrdh » Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:52 am
by The balkens » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:16 am
Len Hyet wrote:Morrdh wrote:
She's only about an inch shy of five feet.
Nope, too short.
5"4' minimum.Monfrox wrote:I gave Samantha her medal for all intuitive reasons of not having to deal with it immediately before the next OP. This way, it's done. Hope that's all right with you, Tiger.
And if you boys are going to be making a move on Samantha, I hope you bring your A-game.
Like I said. At least two bottles of tequila, and then some.
by The Tiger Kingdom » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:50 pm
The balkens wrote:does a full bottle of vodka count as an a-game? im considering have alexis and michael take a break for a bit.
Monfrox wrote:I gave Samantha her medal for all intuitive reasons of not having to deal with it immediately before the next OP. This way, it's done. Hope that's all right with you, Tiger.
Morrdh wrote:Anyone having trouble figuring out a service number may find this link useful.
http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/showth ... ce-Numbers
by French Indochine » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:21 am
by Morrdh » Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:24 am
French Indochine wrote:Just here to tell everyone that an IC post is in the works; expect it to be done by noon PST but only posted by nightfall PST. Somehow and for some reason, I can view NS but cannot actually log in at school - I'm typing up on Word you see.
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:52 pm
by Monfrox » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:00 pm
The balkens wrote:Ok. So since I am bored out of my mind and im done studying for a test.
I shall put at least something in this thread.
It's my review of twilight.......oh boy.
My girlfriend actually got me to watch it.
I'm not even 2 minutes into the film and I drew the line......the main character and there are air quotes around "character".....you know what.....I could not finish it.
Just could not.....at all. And SHEs all mad at me as if it's my fault the movie has no creativity at all. I mean it's an insult to literature, just like drunken twitter posts (guilty) and bastardized leet speak.(also guilty. Arrest me)
Back to Excalibur......I wonder what will happen next.
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:05 pm
by Monfrox » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:06 pm
The balkens wrote:Finally! Someone who shares my views!
Seriously...I had to detox my eyes and ears by playing a shit load of war thunder.
Rank 11 Russians URA!!!!
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:16 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:30 pm
The balkens wrote:Right.
The dumbest thing in the film was that the vampire SPARKLED.....SPARKLED GOD DAMN IT.
Vlad the impaler must be Angry as hell....
Though sparkling was most Likely for the countless teen girls visuals....
If any of that shit was realistic (in cool vampire terms)
He would be on fire screaming how he regrets being casted for this movie
(FIN)
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:44 pm
by Morrdh » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:09 pm
Monfrox wrote:The balkens wrote:Ok. So since I am bored out of my mind and im done studying for a test.
I shall put at least something in this thread.
It's my review of twilight.......oh boy.
My girlfriend actually got me to watch it.
I'm not even 2 minutes into the film and I drew the line......the main character and there are air quotes around "character".....you know what.....I could not finish it.
Just could not.....at all. And SHEs all mad at me as if it's my fault the movie has no creativity at all. I mean it's an insult to literature, just like drunken twitter posts (guilty) and bastardized leet speak.(also guilty. Arrest me)
Back to Excalibur......I wonder what will happen next.
Everything is a better love story than Twilight.
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:23 pm
by Morrdh » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:36 pm
The balkens wrote:North American I think......
I usually head straight into the battle.
Me and my dad (yes my dad) were playing online via skype.
His reaction when rammed...
"only the zonderkommando Elbe can ram and get away with it!"
Or
"tsk tsk tsk. Reckless flying Is my biggest peeve"
And
"really? Really really? Where did you train?! While trapped in a cardboard box!?"
by The balkens » Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:50 pm
Morrdh wrote:The balkens wrote:North American I think......
I usually head straight into the battle.
Me and my dad (yes my dad) were playing online via skype.
His reaction when rammed...
"only the zonderkommando Elbe can ram and get away with it!"
Or
"tsk tsk tsk. Reckless flying Is my biggest peeve"
And
"really? Really really? Where did you train?! While trapped in a cardboard box!?"
Huh, I've got the choice of either EU or Russia.
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
