Coalition of Steel [PMT | Recruiting]

[Super Bwitain]

Of course not. What do you think I am, financially responsible?

Relax, I donated accountants for that matter.

*High five*

[New Emperica]

I'm going to go TG Mykma and have him join, then vote for Emprussia so I can be evil and deadlock it.

Wait, we're deadlocked anyway...I hate both locations. ABSTAINS EVERYWHERE!

[YellowApple]

I think my involvement for that particular conflict would be limited to providing supplies and backend logistics, since YellowApple, Inc. wasn't a full member at that time.

I'm not sure I understand. You've been a member for quite a long time, and the conflict started on the fifth of December.

Considering that was in limbo for months, I'm not quite sure how it would play out in my IC timeline

Seeing as my idea of putting it inside a black hole isn't actually possible, I vote for Yellow's idea.

Because underwater places are cool, yo.

If you pick Drop Point, you can do BOTH!

You know how Xhibit (or however the fuck his name is spelled) likes to put things inside of things recursively? Well YellowApple, Inc. can say "Yo dawg, I heard you like embassies, so I put an embassy inside your embassy so you can diplomatically represent while you diplomatically represent" and it would be true on a literal sense.

Seeing as my idea of putting it inside a black hole isn't actually possible, I vote for Yellow's idea.

Because underwater places are cool, yo.

Damn it, you never think of the costs of sending ambassadors to places, do you?

Okay, so now Drop Point and Lucerne are tied, with Emprussia being disqualified

Emperica, could you choose one of the two remaining locations?

There's actually a well-documented surface facility connected to the seafloor city via a giant elevator, so getting there would be no different (and therefore no more expensive) than flying (or boating) to some other location. Its purpose, in fact, is literally to provide surface docks and runways for anything that's not a submarine (or for submarines that can't handle seafloor pressures).

[Xanixi]

I'm not sure I understand. You've been a member for quite a long time, and the conflict started on the fifth of December.

Considering that was in limbo for months, I'm not quite sure how it would play out in my IC timeline

Seeing as my idea of putting it inside a black hole isn't actually possible, I vote for Yellow's idea.

Because underwater places are cool, yo.

If you pick Drop Point, you can do BOTH!

You know how Xhibit (or however the fuck his name is spelled) likes to put things inside of things recursively? Well YellowApple, Inc. can say "Yo dawg, I heard you like embassies, so I put an embassy inside your embassy so you can diplomatically represent while you diplomatically represent" and it would be true on a literal sense.

Damn it, you never think of the costs of sending ambassadors to places, do you?

Okay, so now Drop Point and Lucerne are tied, with Emprussia being disqualified

Emperica, could you choose one of the two remaining locations?

There's actually a well-documented surface facility connected to the seafloor city via a giant elevator, so getting there would be no different (and therefore no more expensive) than flying (or boating) to some other location. Its purpose, in fact, is literally to provide surface docks and runways for anything that's not a submarine (or for submarines that can't handle seafloor pressures).

Limbo?
I think you're thinking of a totally different RP.

Also, it's Xzibit.

And...
Well, I'll keep seeing the fight for Lucerne.

I'm going to go TG Mykma and have him join, then vote for Emprussia so I can be evil and deadlock it.

Wait, we're deadlocked anyway...I hate both locations. ABSTAINS EVERYWHERE!

Only Council States are voting this one...

[Super Bwitain]

Imperial 12^th Legion

3^rd Legion Battlegroup


• ^1st Corps
  
  • Fifty thousand Legionaries
• ^2nd Corps
  
  • Fifty thousand Legionaries

4^th Legion Battlegroup


• ^1st Corps
  
  • Fifty thousand Legionaries
• ^2nd Corps
  
  • Fifty thousand Legionaries

Imperial 6^th Fleet


One Hell-fire class Super Carrier

• Four Overseer class AWACS (Early Warning Squadron)
• Twenty B1-50 Super Falcon fighters (Two Squadrons)
• Fifteen F-180B Hornet Multi-role fighters (One Squadron)
• Ten Imperial Sea-hawk Utility helicopters

Two Citadel class Amphibious Assault Ships

• Five Minotaur class Transports (One Transport Helicopter Squadron)
• Five Workhorse Class Transports (One Transport Helicopter Squadron)
• Eight Devastator class Gunships (Two Attack Helicopter Squadrons)

Ten SA-15 class Destroyers
Ten Ares class Attack Submarines (Electric)
Ten Zeus class Frigates (Guided Missile)
Ten Falcon class Frigates (Anti-Sbmarine)

Total Numbers

• Two hundred thousand men
  
• Fourty-three ships

[Xanixi]

Okay. So I wanted to make a weapon that would spread across Coalition states. Not sure why, but I do want to see this weapon in action in other members.

Thanks!

Click for larger resolution

• Weight: 3.2 kg (empty), 3.76 kg (loaded)
• Length: 1,050mm
• Barrel length: 406mm
• Cartridge: Varied; compatible with Coalition standard rounds
• Rate of fire: 900 rpm
• Muzzle velocity: 960 m/s
• Effective range: 600 meters
• Feed system: MagLevel PMAG 30-round
• Sights: Varies
• Price per unit: US$2,980
• Programme cost: US$12.6 million

Attachments

• ACOG scope
  
  • Interchangeable
• Modular Combat Grip
  
  • Interchangeable
• Flash light

The CARS - or the Coalition Assault Rifle System - is a weapon produced by American Defense Industries after a request from the Allied States government established grounds for the conception of a weapon that could be cheaply distributed and produced in all Coalition of Steel observer, member and Council states. The idea behind the weapon system was an equalized equipment pallet for Coalition forces, allowing for greater military union. Though not all nations would be forced to accept the new weapon, it would be strongly encouraged.

The CARS is the result of a long and expensive project by ADI to produce a weapon that the DoD deemed to be excellently marked in the categories in which Coalition states may find themselves. Several other weapons - the AM72, AM81 - built in conjunction with Majestic Arms - and ADIR 5 were denied due to flaws in its systems that the DoD argued would become invalid in most Coalition states.

The design - which does not carry a shorter carbine version - was produced with the intention of developing a weapon that, though would face more trouble than carbine counterparts in urbanized locations of warfare, such as the American colony of Aeia, would face targets with ease in expansive locations, such as the expansive Siberian wastelands of the UESR.

The MagLevel PMAG 30-round magazine was implemented for this weapon because it was determined that the weapon required a normal-sized magazine for her functionality and that the appearance of any smaller magazine would pose a great danger for soldiers. However, the PMAG ensured that soldiers were able to take full advantage of the weapon's characteristics and features.

Following the evaluations of the CARS, it was proposed to the Department of Defense, who has since approved it for distribution across CoS member states.

[YellowApple]

Okay. So I wanted to make a weapon that would spread across Coalition states. Not sure why, but I do want to see this weapon in action in other members.

Thanks!

Click for larger resolution
([url=http://i.imgur.com/mSCZWog.png?1]Image)[/url]

• Weight: 3.2 kg (empty), 3.76 kg (loaded)
• Length: 1,050mm
• Barrel length: 406mm
• Cartridge: 5.56x45mm Royal
• Rate of fire: 900 rpm
• Muzzle velocity: 960 m/s
• Effective range: 600 metres
• Feed system: MagLevel PMAG 30-round
• Sights: Varies
• Price per unit: US$2,980
• Programme cost: US$12.6 million

Attachments

• ACOG scope
  
  • Interchangeable
• Modular Combat Grip
  
  • Interchangeable
• Flash light

The CARS - or the Coalition Assault Rifle System - is a weapon produced by European Defence Industries after a request from the European government established grounds for the conception of a weapon that could be cheaply distributed and produced in all Coalition of Steel observer, member and Council states. The idea behind the weapon system was an equalised equipment pallet for Coalition forces, allowing for greater military union. Though not all nations would be forced to accept the new weapon, it would be strongly encouraged.

The CARS is the result of a long and expensive project by EDI to produce a weapon that the European Defence Council deemed to be excellently marked in the categories in which Coalition states may find themselves. Several other weapons - the EM72, EM81 - built in conjunction with Majestic Arms - and EDIR 5 were denied due to flaws in its systems that the Defence Council argued would become invalid in most Coalition states.

The design - which does not carry a shorter carbine version - was produced with the intention of developing a weapon that, though would face more trouble than carbine counterparts in urbanised locations of warfare, such as Saint Antoine, would face targets with ease in expansive locations, like La Mancha.

The MagLevel PMAG 30-round magazine was implemented for this weapon because it was determined that the weapon required a normal-sized clip for her functionality and that the appearance of any smaller magazine would pose a great danger for soldiers. However, the PMAG ensured that soldiers were able to take full advantage of the weapon's characteristics and features.

Following the evaluations of the CARS, it was proposed to the European Defence Council, who has since approved it for distribution across CoS member states.

Not a bad weapon. Unfortunately, it would see only limited use among YellowApplan forces, since 1/128mmYA (roughly 7.8mm) caliber is already standard, and thus the weapon (as well as the 5.56×45mm Royal) would be utilized only in intra-Coalition operations (and even then).

On that note, I figure I'll contribute some troops. 4,096 Aerospace Marines and four 32-piece squadrons of Aerospace Interceptors ought to suffice for now

[Xanixi]

Okay. So I wanted to make a weapon that would spread across Coalition states. Not sure why, but I do want to see this weapon in action in other members.

Thanks!

Click for larger resolution
([url=http://i.imgur.com/mSCZWog.png?1]Image)[/url]

• Weight: 3.2 kg (empty), 3.76 kg (loaded)
• Length: 1,050mm
• Barrel length: 406mm
• Cartridge: 5.56x45mm Royal
• Rate of fire: 900 rpm
• Muzzle velocity: 960 m/s
• Effective range: 600 metres
• Feed system: MagLevel PMAG 30-round
• Sights: Varies
• Price per unit: US$2,980
• Programme cost: US$12.6 million

Attachments

• ACOG scope
  
  • Interchangeable
• Modular Combat Grip
  
  • Interchangeable
• Flash light

The CARS - or the Coalition Assault Rifle System - is a weapon produced by European Defence Industries after a request from the European government established grounds for the conception of a weapon that could be cheaply distributed and produced in all Coalition of Steel observer, member and Council states. The idea behind the weapon system was an equalised equipment pallet for Coalition forces, allowing for greater military union. Though not all nations would be forced to accept the new weapon, it would be strongly encouraged.

The CARS is the result of a long and expensive project by EDI to produce a weapon that the European Defence Council deemed to be excellently marked in the categories in which Coalition states may find themselves. Several other weapons - the EM72, EM81 - built in conjunction with Majestic Arms - and EDIR 5 were denied due to flaws in its systems that the Defence Council argued would become invalid in most Coalition states.

The design - which does not carry a shorter carbine version - was produced with the intention of developing a weapon that, though would face more trouble than carbine counterparts in urbanised locations of warfare, such as Saint Antoine, would face targets with ease in expansive locations, like La Mancha.

The MagLevel PMAG 30-round magazine was implemented for this weapon because it was determined that the weapon required a normal-sized clip for her functionality and that the appearance of any smaller magazine would pose a great danger for soldiers. However, the PMAG ensured that soldiers were able to take full advantage of the weapon's characteristics and features.

Following the evaluations of the CARS, it was proposed to the European Defence Council, who has since approved it for distribution across CoS member states.

Not a bad weapon. Unfortunately, it would see only limited use among YellowApplan forces, since 1/128mmYA (roughly 7.8mm) caliber is already standard, and thus the weapon (as well as the 5.56×45mm Royal) would be utilized only in intra-Coalition operations (and even then).

On that note, I figure I'll contribute some troops. 4,096 Aerospace Marines and four 32-piece squadrons of Aerospace Interceptors ought to suffice for now

I had imagined that the weapon would be for the C.E.F primarily, but okay. I suppose the cartridge itself could be changed per nation to its standard. Plus handwavium for compatibility.

Also, could you make an ORBAT?

[YellowApple]

Not a bad weapon. Unfortunately, it would see only limited use among YellowApplan forces, since 1/128mmYA (roughly 7.8mm) caliber is already standard, and thus the weapon (as well as the 5.56×45mm Royal) would be utilized only in intra-Coalition operations (and even then).

On that note, I figure I'll contribute some troops. 4,096 Aerospace Marines and four 32-piece squadrons of Aerospace Interceptors ought to suffice for now

I had imagined that the weapon would be for the C.E.F primarily, but okay. I suppose the cartridge itself could be changed per nation to its standard. Plus handwavium for compatibility.

Also, could you make an ORBAT?

I need an ORBAT? How... excessively formal. Especially for such a minimalist force. But fine...

Apparently there's a limit of only 6000 characters on this forum, so I had to settle with a Pastebin link.

And I haven't even gone into logistical units and the carrier's personnel.

Also, pretend that there's a closing quotation mark after 'Force'.

Never mind, fixed it.

[Imperial--japan]

May I reccomend that the Imperial Japanese Empire lead the Coalitions combined Military Forces? What say ye?

[Altaiire]

only if you buy 20,000 units of Xanixi's guns.

[Imperial--japan]

only if you buy 20,000 units of Xanixi's guns.

Name your price you sick Genie.

[Altaiire]

zero dollors and zero sents!

[Imperial--japan]

zero dollors and zero sents!

You have yourself a deal.

[Xanixi]

May I reccomend that the Imperial Japanese Empire lead the Coalitions combined Military Forces? What say ye?

Unfortunately, no. The CEF is made - and thus led - by Council states.

[Grand Britannia]

---

FV-170 Vincent Ward

---

FV170A1 Model

---

TypeMain Battle Tank

Place of OriginBritannia

---

Service History

---

In Service2038 - Present

Used ByBritannian Imperial Army

---

Production History

---

DesignerCamelot

Designed2028

ManufacturerMinerva Heavy Industries
Nano^TM Technologies

Unit Cost14 million Sterlings

Produced2036 - Present

VariantsLV170A1, LV170A2

---

Specifications

---

WeightA2: 59.3 Tonnes

LengthA2: 8.2 meters(Gun forward)
A7: 7.01 meters(Gun forward)
A12: 10.5 meters(Gun forward)

WidthA2: 3.87 meters

HeightA2: 3.4 meters

Crew4(Commander,gunner, driver, loader)

---

ArmourNanotube Reinforced Silicon
Carbide Titanium Matrix

MainA2: 1 x 125mm Mk. IV MagLaunch
Armament

Secondary1 x 7.62 L12MG34 w/ 1,200 rounds
Armament1 x 12.7 L27HMG2 w/ 950 rounds
MLRS Packs Units(9 x pack)

EngineLogan LTD Internally Radiating
Impulse Structure hydrogen engine
(1800 HP)

TransmissionRML Model 2030

SuspensionHydropneumatic Active

Fuel Capacity280 Gallons

Operational856 km
Range

Speed67 mph

Holy shit perfect 5550 posts.

Also, I posted because my head is out of the basement.

[New Emperica]

(or for submarines that can't handle seafloor pressures).

*hides rusting submarine fleet manned by one elderly guy mopping the floor*

Yeah...it's a good thing I invested in long range aircraft.

----

And on the CARS: I'll probably just use it for 'dem derpy Siberia Corps. A gun for wide open areas will serve them well, even if we do have to reconfigure every gun we by to be UIO compatible.

[YellowApple]

---

FV-170 Vincent Ward

---

(Image)

FV170A1 Model

---

TypeMain Battle Tank

Place of OriginBritannia

---

Service History

---

In Service2038 - Present

Used ByBritannian Imperial Army

---

Production History

---

DesignerCamelot

Designed2028

ManufacturerMinerva Heavy Industries
Nano^TM Technologies

Unit Cost14 million Sterlings

Produced2036 - Present

VariantsLV170A1, LV170A2

---

Specifications

---

WeightA2: 59.3 Tonnes

LengthA2: 8.2 meters(Gun forward)
A7: 7.01 meters(Gun forward)
A12: 10.5 meters(Gun forward)

WidthA2: 3.87 meters

HeightA2: 3.4 meters

Crew4(Commander,gunner, driver, loader)

---

ArmourNanotube Reinforced Silicon
Carbide Titanium Matrix

MainA2: 1 x 125mm Mk. IV MagLaunch
Armament

Secondary1 x 7.62 L12MG34 w/ 1,200 rounds
Armament1 x 12.7 L27HMG2 w/ 950 rounds
MLRS Packs Units(9 x pack)

EngineLogan LTD Internally Radiating
Impulse Structure hydrogen engine
(1800 HP)

TransmissionRML Model 2030

SuspensionHydropneumatic Active

Fuel Capacity280 Gallons

Operational856 km
Range

Speed67 mph

Holy shit perfect 5550 posts.

Also, I posted because my head is out of the basement.

Yay for postgives! I'll respond... er... eventually.

(or for submarines that can't handle seafloor pressures).

*hides rusting submarine fleet manned by one elderly guy mopping the floor*

Yeah...it's a good thing I invested in long range aircraft.

----

And on the CARS: I'll probably just use it for 'dem derpy Siberia Corps. A gun for wide open areas will serve them well, even if we do have to reconfigure every gun we by to be UIO compatible.

Don't worry, YellowApple, Inc. is right there with you for a lack of proper submarines. It maintains a small fleet of aerospace frigate-class vessels retrofitted to be submarines (i.e. swapping out aerospace drives for underwater propulsion, helium/hydrogen buoyancy tanks for ballast tanks, etc.) and a few diplomatic vessels for a couple of underwater nations and/or nations with heavy underwater infrastructure (Kalaspia-Shimarata, any seapony race, etc.). Everything else is based on anti-submarine-equipped bombers/frigates and automated torpedo defense systems.

[Grand Britannia]

---

FV-170 Vincent Ward

---

(Image)

FV170A1 Model

---

TypeMain Battle Tank

Place of OriginBritannia

---

Service History

---

In Service2038 - Present

Used ByBritannian Imperial Army

---

Production History

---

DesignerCamelot

Designed2028

ManufacturerMinerva Heavy Industries
Nano^TM Technologies

Unit Cost14 million Sterlings

Produced2036 - Present

VariantsLV170A1, LV170A2

---

Specifications

---

WeightA2: 59.3 Tonnes

LengthA2: 8.2 meters(Gun forward)
A7: 7.01 meters(Gun forward)
A12: 10.5 meters(Gun forward)

WidthA2: 3.87 meters

HeightA2: 3.4 meters

Crew4(Commander,gunner, driver, loader)

---

ArmourNanotube Reinforced Silicon
Carbide Titanium Matrix

MainA2: 1 x 125mm Mk. IV MagLaunch
Armament

Secondary1 x 7.62 L12MG34 w/ 1,200 rounds
Armament1 x 12.7 L27HMG2 w/ 950 rounds
MLRS Packs Units(9 x pack)

EngineLogan LTD Internally Radiating
Impulse Structure hydrogen engine
(1800 HP)

TransmissionRML Model 2030

SuspensionHydropneumatic Active

Fuel Capacity280 Gallons

Operational856 km
Range

Speed67 mph

Holy shit perfect 5550 posts.

Also, I posted because my head is out of the basement.

Yay for postgives! I'll respond... er... eventually.

It's OK it took me a month to reply to my own thread

[New Emperica]

I need your guys' opinions on something. What military emblem should I use?

This old, old Ministry of Defense seal that Imagey made...like a long time ago;

just one of the stupid looking individual branch seals that I never should've requested Imagey to make. Once again, quite a while ago;

or just request Imagey to make a new one, or make it myself?

[YellowApple]

I need your guys' opinions on something. What military emblem should I use?

This old, old Ministry of Defense seal that Imagey made...like a long time ago;

just one of the stupid looking individual branch seals that I never should've requested Imagey to make. Once again, quite a while ago;

or just request Imagey to make a new one, or make it myself?

Is...

Is that a liger in that second emblem?

[New Emperica]

Is...

Is that a liger in that second emblem?

I don't even know anymore. I think it's a weird looking lion.

[Grand Britannia]

I like the first one more.

The AUGs in the second one make it looks strange.

[Xanixi]

I need your guys' opinions on something. What military emblem should I use?

This old, old Ministry of Defense seal that Imagey made...like a long time ago;

just one of the stupid looking individual branch seals that I never should've requested Imagey to make. Once again, quite a while ago;

or just request Imagey to make a new one, or make it myself?

Is...

Is that a liger in that second emblem?

You know, I was just thinking that.

[YellowApple]

Is...

Is that a liger in that second emblem?

I don't even know anymore. I think it's a weird looking lion.

Call it a liger and that logo has my instant vote, no matter how horrible it actually looks.