by North Stradia » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:18 pm
by Souseiseki » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:20 pm
by Volnotova » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:22 pm
by The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:23 pm
by Saruhan » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:24 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.
by Souseiseki » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:25 pm
Volnotova wrote:No Palestinian State, in one form or another.
No concessions of any kind.
And secularize Israel? Over my dead body. There are plenty of secular states out there, why don't the securalists just pack their stuff and leave if they dislike Judaism and Jewish culture so much?
by Blazedtown » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:27 pm
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:28 pm
Volnotova wrote:No Palestinian State, in one form or another.
No concessions of any kind.
And secularize Israel? Over my dead body. There are plenty of secular states out there, why don't the securalists just pack their stuff and leave if they dislike Judaism and Jewish culture so much?
by The God-Realm » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:28 pm
Volnotova wrote:No Palestinian State, in one form or another.
No concessions of any kind.
And secularize Israel? Over my dead body. There are plenty of secular states out there, why don't the securalists just pack their stuff and leave if they dislike Judaism and Jewish culture so much?
by Volnotova » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:28 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Volnotova wrote:No Palestinian State, in one form or another.
No concessions of any kind.
And secularize Israel? Over my dead body. There are plenty of secular states out there, why don't the securalists just pack their stuff and leave if they dislike Judaism and Jewish culture so much?
no concessions of any kind, sounds reasonable. you will lead us to peace.
by Sulamalik » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:28 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:29 pm
by North Stradia » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:29 pm
by Souseiseki » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm
I'm sure your plan for peace will extend far beyond the confines of this Internet sub-forum.
by The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm
by The God-Realm » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:31 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Volnotova wrote:
If there is no Palestine then there is no need for a peace agreement, now is there?
i dunno man, i don't think people will be happy with your "fuck you palestine" planI'm sure your plan for peace will extend far beyond the confines of this Internet sub-forum.
sup israel buddy, do you have a problem with the ops suggestions or do you just want to shit talk about hurrrrr internet forum?
by Sulamalik » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:32 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Volnotova wrote:
If there is no Palestine then there is no need for a peace agreement, now is there?
i dunno man, i don't think people will be happy with your "fuck you palestine" planI'm sure your plan for peace will extend far beyond the confines of this Internet sub-forum.
sup israel buddy, do you have a problem with the ops suggestions or do you just want to shit talk about hurrrrr internet forum?
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?
by North Stradia » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:32 pm
Sulamalik wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
i dunno man, i don't think people will be happy with your "fuck you palestine" plan
sup israel buddy, do you have a problem with the ops suggestions or do you just want to shit talk about hurrrrr internet forum?
I find the proposal to remove Hamas from power to be a bit on the vague side.
Am I cool yet?
by Shofercia » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:33 pm
North Stradia wrote:The elections in Israel have got me thinking about this.
As (I hope) you know, there has been a long-running conflict between Israel and Palestine. The conflict is immensely complex, and there are many legitimate arguments to support both sides. Countless proposals have been brought up on how to solve the conflict. For example, some call for a "two-state solution", in which Gaza and the West Bank become independent from Israel, and Israel itself continues to exist. Others support a "one-state solution", in which Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank are united into one state, which would be Arab, Jewish, or secular, depending on who you ask.
Here's my opinion.
End all Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
Remove Hamas from power.
Secularize Israel. End all discrimination against Arabs.
Allow the residents of Gaza and the West Bank to determine their own future, in free, democratic, internationally observed referenda.
I'd like to see Israel, Gaza and the West Bank united into one secular state where Arabs and Jews are treated equally. However, if Gaza and the West Bank prefer independence, or some other situation, they should get that.
What do you think?
by Nicer potlimitomaha » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:33 pm
End all Jewish settlements in the West Bank.
Remove Hamas from power.
Secularize Israel.
End all discrimination against Arabs.
Allow the residents of Gaza and the West Bank to determine their own future, in free, democratic, internationally observed referenda.
I'd like to see Israel, Gaza and the West Bank united into one secular state where Arabs and Jews are treated equally.
However, if Gaza and the West Bank prefer independence, or some other situation, they should get that.
by Sulamalik » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:33 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?
by Volnotova » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:33 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:(Palestinians) It is their ancient homeland as well, they want part of that land to be theirs entirely, you know the areas where their people live. They are entitled to have their home, as are the Israelis.
(Secularists) They are entitled to speak their opinions and state positions,
...as does anyone in the so called only functional democracy of the Middle east. So no they should not leave for another country if they want their home to be secular. They will state that they want it to be so.
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:34 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Kannap, Little TN Horde, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Nuevo Meshiko, Ravemath, Rusozak, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Verkhoyanska, Yasuragi
Advertisement