Advertisement
by The Second Moon Rising » Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:52 pm
by States of Glory WA Office » Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:00 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Fairburn: I do believe that you're right for the wrong reasons, Lord Colonel His Grace Cyril Parsons, 1st Duke of Geneva, 1st Earl Parsons of Eastminster, 8th Viscount Parsons of Eastminster, 1st Baron Markenshire of Concilium, Knight of the Garter, Grand Cross of St Michael and St George, Privy Councillor, Member of Parliament for Those-Across-the-Seas; Proconsul Decimus; Permanent Representative to the World Assembly. It should be in the accusative form, but on the basis that it is the object of the sentence, not that it is the subject.
"Ambassadors, it belongs to the Nominative case, being the agent of the finite word "solum", and, being of the female gender in that it relates to lingua, a feminine word, would receive the singular ending -a."
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:22 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:"Ambassadors, it belongs to the Nominative case, being the agent of the finite word "solum", and, being of the female gender in that it relates to lingua, a feminine word, would receive the singular ending -a."
Fairburn: 'Lingua bona' is the agent of 'solum'. The 'lingua bona' is performing the verb 'est' to the noun-adjective combination 'linguam mortuam'. Now, if you don't shut up, someone here is going to be 'mortuum' and it isn't going to be me.
Neville: Does that not count as a threat?
Fairburn: Cui, Nevillus? Bello?
OOC: OK, seriously, does the word 'est' in Latin make a noun accusative? I could honestly see an argument either way.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:31 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:...OOC: OK, seriously, does the word 'est' in Latin make a noun accusative? I could honestly see an argument either way.
by Storyia » Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:03 pm
by States of Glory WA Office » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:23 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Fairburn: 'Lingua bona' is the agent of 'solum'. The 'lingua bona' is performing the verb 'est' to the noun-adjective combination 'linguam mortuam'. Now, if you don't shut up, someone here is going to be 'mortuum' and it isn't going to be me.
Neville: Does that not count as a threat?
Fairburn: Cui, Nevillus? Bello?
OOC: OK, seriously, does the word 'est' in Latin make a noun accusative? I could honestly see an argument either way.
OOC: never in my experience, but I was a poor Latin student. It's inflectional, while English is positional, and I never managed to reconcile that in my brain. My Latin always looked very...well, American. Got on well with their philosophy, though.
by Imperium Anglorum » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:11 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:OOC: How can Latin look American? 'tabernam hostorum intravi. Biggus Maccus consumpsi.'
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:25 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: never in my experience, but I was a poor Latin student. It's inflectional, while English is positional, and I never managed to reconcile that in my brain. My Latin always looked very...well, American. Got on well with their philosophy, though.
OOC: How can Latin look American? 'tabernam hostorum intravi. Biggus Maccus consumpsi.'
I've also realised that I haven't expressed my opinion on the two proposals. I'm against both of them. The universal translators do a good enough job.
by Dooom35796821595 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:20 am
Tinfect wrote:"The Imperium sees no reason to teach foreign languages within our borders, nor would we allow such a thing to take place were there reason. This proposal that you seek to garner support for, provides no justification whatsoever for its mandates, and fails to explain why this 'Esperanto' nonsense is chosen above... whatever this language the World Assembly mandates is called; 'Inglish', or somesuch gibbering. In any case, the Imperium will not see the language of our people displaced by some foreign nonsense."
by States of Glory WA Office » Fri Sep 23, 2016 8:08 pm
by Elke and Elba » Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:11 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Madsons: What is this Esperanto bullshit? Never heard of it. It's patently obvious to me that anyone who doesn't speak Latin is a barbarian.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Bears Armed » Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:04 am
by Almonaster Nuevo » Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:13 am
Bears Armed wrote:OOC: Allegedly, on Earth-RL nowadays, Klingon has more speakers than Esperanto does!
^_^
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:15 am
Bears Armed wrote:OOC: Allegedly, on Earth-RL nowadays, Klingon has more speakers than Esperanto does!
^_^
by Sierra Lyricalia » Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:39 am
by Araraukar » Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:41 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Libertarianopolis » Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:53 pm
by Noahs Second Country » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:56 am
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:35 am
Noahs Second Country wrote:I think that English serves well enough,for trade, but maybe a specific language for better communications?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement