Advertisement
by Draica » Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:40 am
by Bananaistan » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:12 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:30 am
Bananaistan wrote:The Sexual Privacy Act.
by Linux and the X » Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:08 pm
Eireann Fae wrote:BELIEVING that simply preaching abstinence is not sufficient for ensuring the sexual health of individuals;
Committee on Sexual Education (CSE)
REQUIRES Member Nations to allow individuals that have reached the threshold of majority to have unrestricted access to the CSE and their research,
CLARIFIES that Member Nations may set their own curriculum, or none at all, if they so choose
by Eireann Fae » Thu Mar 06, 2014 6:43 am
by Friday Freshman » Thu Mar 06, 2014 6:47 am
Eireann Fae wrote:
"As this is a particularly contentious subject, I will address Ambassador Friday's comment. We completely intend to leave abortion - and all other forms of termination of pregnancy - out of this proposal. We hope you do not mind individuals having access to information regarding contraceptives, though. We thank you for your tentative support."
by Elke and Elba » Thu Mar 06, 2014 6:58 am
Friday Freshman wrote:Eireann Fae wrote:
"As this is a particularly contentious subject, I will address Ambassador Friday's comment. We completely intend to leave abortion - and all other forms of termination of pregnancy - out of this proposal. We hope you do not mind individuals having access to information regarding contraceptives, though. We thank you for your tentative support."
"I have nothing against contraceptives as long as we are not considering abortion a contraceptive. That was my problem with the last resolution. If that is not a problem then this delegation believes in your nations ability to do this well."
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Friday Freshman » Thu Mar 06, 2014 7:59 am
Elke and Elba wrote:Friday Freshman wrote:
"I have nothing against contraceptives as long as we are not considering abortion a contraceptive. That was my problem with the last resolution. If that is not a problem then this delegation believes in your nations ability to do this well."
"Ambassador Friday! When the hell is there abortion in this act?! Are you drunk, sir? Go back to the other chamber!"
Ambassador Norrland inhales and exhales a deep breath before continuing-
"Alex, now that's much better! EnE and its Dominions provisionally supports the resolution.
Now, finally a bill to deal with those fornicating rabbits in heat. Finally!"
by Romaterra (Ancient) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:01 am
by Eireann Fae » Sun Mar 09, 2014 1:18 am
by The Dark Star Republic » Sun Mar 09, 2014 1:24 am
Eireann Fae wrote:"We have implemented most of the suggestions you have proposed, but not all of them. The changes to our draft - and the reasons behind them - can be seen under the notes for the Second Revision. Rather than recap all of that, I shall simply speak on what changes we have not made, and why. Ambassador Fungschlammer, you are correct in your reasoning for not mandating that Member Nations implement a particular curriculum. There are many nations that do not even utilise national education systems, and we would not care to force them to implement one to teach this subject alone. We have, however, added a clause seeking to prevent Member Nations from interfering with local, private instruction. It should be noted that the added clause has nothing to do with the committee, so we hope this helps stave off concerns regarding the legality of our proposal on that front."
by Hakio » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:54 am
Pandeeria wrote:Racism is almost as good as eating babies.
by De re publica populi Romani » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:13 pm
Braylandia wrote:We support your act. Being Liberal is the best
by ALMF » Tue Mar 11, 2014 7:30 pm
The Dark Star Republic wrote:Eireann Fae wrote:"We have implemented most of the suggestions you have proposed, but not all of them. The changes to our draft - and the reasons behind them - can be seen under the notes for the Second Revision. Rather than recap all of that, I shall simply speak on what changes we have not made, and why. Ambassador Fungschlammer, you are correct in your reasoning for not mandating that Member Nations implement a particular curriculum. There are many nations that do not even utilise national education systems, and we would not care to force them to implement one to teach this subject alone. We have, however, added a clause seeking to prevent Member Nations from interfering with local, private instruction. It should be noted that the added clause has nothing to do with the committee, so we hope this helps stave off concerns regarding the legality of our proposal on that front."
"I'm not suggesting the WA mandate 'a particular curriculum'. But as this stands this permits nations to not implement any curriculum at all! If the WA is going to promote the broadest possible interpretations of sexual freedom and bodily integrity, then it has a responsibility to ensure that everyone understands those rights and freedoms. I also find it perplexing that you're willing to meekly submit to the sovereigntist lobby on the issue of sex education, but not on the issue of sex-selective abortion; it's a bizarre set of priorities.
"The WA requires certain basic educational standards. The omission of sex education from those standards is a travesty - but one your proposal could easily correct."
~ Ambassador to the WA Inky Fungschlammer
by Eireann Fae » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:31 pm
by The Eternal Kawaii » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:31 pm
The Dark Star Republic wrote:"I'm really not sure I buy the sovereigntist argument on this one. The WA has forced all countries to legalise incest and abortion, has several times tried to legalise prostitution, and has generally taken the most expansive possible view of sexual freedoms. I would argue the WA has clearly incurred a moral responsibility to promote sex education.
by Separatist Peoples » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:54 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:"I'm really not sure I buy the sovereigntist argument on this one. The WA has forced all countries to legalise incest and abortion, has several times tried to legalise prostitution, and has generally taken the most expansive possible view of sexual freedoms. I would argue the WA has clearly incurred a moral responsibility to promote sex education.
With all due respect to the ambassador from the Dark Star Republic, that is the most obnoxious example of blaming the victim that we have heard in this chamber in quite some time. The WA forces abominations like unrestricted abortion and incest upon member states, and then has the gall to suggest it should also mandate sex education because these nations are bereft of any sexual morality?
by Sionis Prioratus » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:57 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:"I'm really not sure I buy the sovereigntist argument on this one. The WA has forced all countries to legalise incest and abortion, has several times tried to legalise prostitution, and has generally taken the most expansive possible view of sexual freedoms. I would argue the WA has clearly incurred a moral responsibility to promote sex education.
With all due respect to the ambassador from the Dark Star Republic, that is the most obnoxious example of blaming the victim that we have heard in this chamber in quite some time. The WA forces abominations like unrestricted abortion and incest upon member states, and then has the gall to suggest it should also mandate sex education because these nations are bereft of any sexual morality?
by The Dark Star Republic » Thu Mar 13, 2014 12:42 am
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:"I'm really not sure I buy the sovereigntist argument on this one. The WA has forced all countries to legalise incest and abortion, has several times tried to legalise prostitution, and has generally taken the most expansive possible view of sexual freedoms. I would argue the WA has clearly incurred a moral responsibility to promote sex education.
With all due respect to the ambassador from the Dark Star Republic, that is the most obnoxious example of blaming the victim that we have heard in this chamber in quite some time. The WA forces abominations like unrestricted abortion and incest upon member states, and then has the gall to suggest it should also mandate sex education because these nations are bereft of any sexual morality?
by Bears Armed » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:51 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:I'm not suggesting the WA mandate 'a particular curriculum'. But as this stands this permits nations to not implement any curriculum at all!
by Brilliant Equestria » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:00 am
Bears Armed wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:I'm not suggesting the WA mandate 'a particular curriculum'. But as this stands this permits nations to not implement any curriculum at all!
Surely we have at least one nation amongst us -- whether inhabited by artifical intelligences, beings that reproduce asexually by budding, or whatever -- whose inhabitants simply don't have sex at all? What sort of 'sex education' curriculum would you suggest they should be required to implement?
by The Eternal Kawaii » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:47 pm
Brilliant Equestria wrote:Bears Armed wrote:Surely we have at least one nation amongst us -- whether inhabited by artifical intelligences, beings that reproduce asexually by budding, or whatever -- whose inhabitants simply don't have sex at all? What sort of 'sex education' curriculum would you suggest they should be required to implement?
One this Ambassador would be particularly interested in viewing?
by Eireann Fae » Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:50 am
by Rotwood » Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:39 pm
by Eireann Fae » Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Nova Zueratopia, Zinke Zoogle Bee-Bop
Advertisement