Mallorea and Riva wrote:Nope, I'm doing it to open it up to active raiding. Again TSP is not the justification. And I haven't bothered checking the others because we all know that Haven was involved. Claims to the contrary are falling apart every time evidence comes forward.Kylarnatia wrote:
...Are you for real?
I mean, I'm for serious, are you for real?
You're only going on the possibility that he might have made an alternate WA nation to raid TSP during that time. You have no actual physical evidence to prove that. For all you know, he may have decided to drop from the WA because he was bored of receiving telegrams for helping the liberation effort. I know I received a few.
Furthermore, you're going to terrorise (oh, I'm sorry, "liberate") an entire region, for the potential actions of one player?Vetok wrote:
Let's look at Haven. Hmm, seems Cravan is in it...after refounding his nation seven hours ago. So he was in there after you posted this, and therefore one of the main reasons you have for this only came back to NS and to Haven hours after this all started. That's one pile of bullshit sent for manure, let's see some other names.
Cravan has been there for years prior to his CTE. Check the history. I don't need to lie about this, and the worst part is that the Roleplayers know that I'm telling the truth. Huge numbers of them were involved.
But here's the problem: You want to raid Haven. You haven't made this a secret. Which means the same rule of mistrust applies to you. We don't want to see it raided, so we're very likely to be biased and will likely omit evidence that runs contrary to our interests.
You, however, do want to see it raided. So you're also likely to be very biased.
There is a good chance you know what really went down, but we can't take your word for it since you have admitted that raiding Haven is in your interests, thus, any evidence you may have that would run contrary to the interest might be excluded for your own gain. Just as many of the RPers might be acting out of their own interests.