NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread Type 08

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
EsToVnIa
Senator
 
Posts: 4779
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby EsToVnIa » Mon May 18, 2015 11:09 am

Husseinarti wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:The Finnish soldiers who operated Lahti AT rifles were true men.

Can a modern anti-materiel rifle destroy a transport helicopter in flight?


Probs.


just shoot the rotors

it works in dayz all the time
Most Heavenly State/Khamgiin Tengerleg Uls

Weeaboo Gassing Land wrote:Also, rev up the gas chambers.

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:CUNT

12:02:02 AM <Tarsas> premislyd is my spirit animal tbh

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 18, 2015 11:10 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:The Finnish soldiers who operated Lahti AT rifles were true men.

Can a modern anti-materiel rifle destroy a transport helicopter in flight?

AM rounds will penetrate and damage vital components which may include fuel lines, rotor heads, manifolds, pilots etc.
So, yes, possibly.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Mon May 18, 2015 11:10 am

Estovnia wrote:
Husseinarti wrote:
Probs.


just shoot the rotors

it works in dayz all the time


No in BF4 I always shot the pilot and stole it.
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

User avatar
Tulacia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 848
Founded: Jul 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tulacia » Mon May 18, 2015 11:21 am

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Tulacia wrote:How effective are modern HESH shells? I'm still debating the use of a smoothbore or rifled gun, and the only benefit to a rifled gun seems to be the purpose of HESH.

HESH is still effective but has largely been replaced by HEAT and APFSDS. HESH doesn't work so well against modern armor because of the multiple layers and spacing used in modern tank armor. Less modern armor, and vehicles (or buildings) with less sophisticated vehicles will also be more susceptible.


Isn't HEAT not very effective either because of ERA? I thought HESH was basically a better HEAT shell, functioning like one but isn't ineffectuated by ERA.

So in the modern era HESH pretty much functions as a normal HE round.
Internet conked out for two months. Deeply apologize to all I was involved with on the forums in various RPs and such.

If I post stupid and shitty things after 10PM CST, please ignore it. I'm tired and being an idiot.

Factbook is a major WIP, read it with a grain of salt.

Democratic Socialist and England wanna-be.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 18, 2015 11:26 am

Tulacia wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:HESH is still effective but has largely been replaced by HEAT and APFSDS. HESH doesn't work so well against modern armor because of the multiple layers and spacing used in modern tank armor. Less modern armor, and vehicles (or buildings) with less sophisticated vehicles will also be more susceptible.


Isn't HEAT not very effective either because of ERA? I thought HESH was basically a better HEAT shell, functioning like one but isn't ineffectuated by ERA.

So in the modern era HESH pretty much functions as a normal HE round.

ERA degrades the effectiveness of all munitions. This is true of basically any countermeasure - special armour, composites, cages.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12484
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Mon May 18, 2015 11:29 am

Tulacia wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:HESH is still effective but has largely been replaced by HEAT and APFSDS. HESH doesn't work so well against modern armor because of the multiple layers and spacing used in modern tank armor. Less modern armor, and vehicles (or buildings) with less sophisticated vehicles will also be more susceptible.


Isn't HEAT not very effective either because of ERA? I thought HESH was basically a better HEAT shell, functioning like one but isn't ineffectuated by ERA.

So in the modern era HESH pretty much functions as a normal HE round.

OK basics of shells.

HE= High Explosive, just a shell filled with explosives. Can have various different ways to detonate (proximity, contact)

HESH= High Explosive Squashed Head, the shell impacts the target and the explosives spread out across the surface of the target before detonation. Works by sending a shock wave through the target causing the inside to splinter.

HEAT= High Explosive Anti Tank, the shell is filled with high explosives and a cone of metal. Detonates at a pre set distance away from the target, where the cone of metal is converted into a "spear" of plasma that punches through the armor of the target.

APFSDS=Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarded Sabot. A pointy bit of metal going very fast. Kills things by just going really fast through the armor.

ERA =Explosive Reactive Armor, two plates of metal with explosives sandwiched in between. When ERA is hit by an incoming shell (of any variety) hits it detonates the explosives, which pushes the outer plate into the oncoming projectile disrupting it and making the armor of the vehicle "thicker"

HESH will set off ERA. HESH is probably more disrupted by ERA than HEAT, especially as there are some tricks that allow HEAT to defeat ERA.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 18, 2015 11:31 am

HESH won't set off ERA, it has a very low impact velocity.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12484
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Mon May 18, 2015 11:32 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:HESH won't set off ERA, it has a very low impact velocity.

Really? I figured the explosion of the HESH warhead would detonate the ERA.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 18, 2015 11:34 am

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:HESH won't set off ERA, it has a very low impact velocity.

Really? I figured the explosion of the HESH warhead would detonate the ERA.

ERA is insensitive for basically this reason. It's another surface and set of material boundaries for the shockwave to transit, though.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Mitheldalond
Minister
 
Posts: 2646
Founded: Mar 15, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby Mitheldalond » Mon May 18, 2015 1:57 pm

IIRC from what Nachmere said awhile back, HESH shells will only cause spalling on a plate a maximum of 1.5 times the diameter of the shell. So a 120mm could only cause spalling on a 180mm thick plate at best. Which basically would make every modern tank completely immune to them.

Also, I have at last returned from my long exile to the land of unending homework and finals.

User avatar
Husseinarti
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Husseinarti » Mon May 18, 2015 2:01 pm

Mitheldalond wrote:IIRC from what Nachmere said awhile back, HESH shells will only cause spalling on a plate a maximum of 1.5 times the diameter of the shell. So a 120mm could only cause spalling on a 180mm thick plate at best. Which basically would make every modern tank completely immune to them.

Also, I have at last returned from my long exile to the land of unending homework and finals.


Just when the thread was almost getting better.
Bash the fash, neopup the neo-cons, crotale the commies, and super entendard socialists

User avatar
EsToVnIa
Senator
 
Posts: 4779
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby EsToVnIa » Mon May 18, 2015 2:08 pm

At least there's no swords here
Most Heavenly State/Khamgiin Tengerleg Uls

Weeaboo Gassing Land wrote:Also, rev up the gas chambers.

The United States of North Amerigo wrote:CUNT

12:02:02 AM <Tarsas> premislyd is my spirit animal tbh

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon May 18, 2015 2:13 pm

Mitheldalond wrote:IIRC from what Nachmere said awhile back, HESH shells will only cause spalling on a plate a maximum of 1.5 times the diameter of the shell. So a 120mm could only cause spalling on a 180mm thick plate at best. Which basically would make every modern tank completely immune to them.

Also, I have at last returned from my long exile to the land of unending homework and finals.

Many Russian tanks have side plates well under 100mm in thickness, admittedly with composites sandwiched in there somewhere.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Nirvash Type TheEND
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14737
Founded: Oct 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nirvash Type TheEND » Mon May 18, 2015 2:41 pm

Unreachable.

User avatar
Bumfrakistan
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Aug 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bumfrakistan » Mon May 18, 2015 2:41 pm

Alien Space Bats wrote:

Bumfrakistan wrote:In order to achieve a 1 man to 2 women ratio, we fight endless wars.

Well, that's one way of doing it... but then, your economy must be in shambles from the endless damage and destruction these wars cause. So Bumfrackistan is a Third World country, then (or worse)?

And have you taken this into account when it comes to army size (by, say, reducing the size of your armed forces by ⅓)?

we have the economy of 1945 Japan.

One third of all German males served in the Nazi armed forces at one point in time.

8% of all French males died in World War One.

User avatar
Tulacia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 848
Founded: Jul 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tulacia » Mon May 18, 2015 2:52 pm

Bumfrakistan wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:


Well, that's one way of doing it... but then, your economy must be in shambles from the endless damage and destruction these wars cause. So Bumfrackistan is a Third World country, then (or worse)?

And have you taken this into account when it comes to army size (by, say, reducing the size of your armed forces by ⅓)?

we have the economy of 1945 Japan.

One third of all German males served in the Nazi armed forces at one point in time.

8% of all French males died in World War One.


"economy of 1945 Japan"

So, in other words, really terrible.
Internet conked out for two months. Deeply apologize to all I was involved with on the forums in various RPs and such.

If I post stupid and shitty things after 10PM CST, please ignore it. I'm tired and being an idiot.

Factbook is a major WIP, read it with a grain of salt.

Democratic Socialist and England wanna-be.

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Mon May 18, 2015 2:57 pm

Bumfrakistan wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:


Well, that's one way of doing it... but then, your economy must be in shambles from the endless damage and destruction these wars cause. So Bumfrackistan is a Third World country, then (or worse)?

And have you taken this into account when it comes to army size (by, say, reducing the size of your armed forces by ⅓)?

we have the economy of 1945 Japan.


Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Mon May 18, 2015 3:05 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Bumfrakistan wrote:we have the economy of 1945 Japan.


Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.

Really tempted to put that in Funny Quotes thread.
Last edited by United Marxist Nations on Mon May 18, 2015 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Mon May 18, 2015 3:08 pm

New Vihenia wrote:Will IRST make a good early warning sensor for an Active Protection System ? range measurement however is provided by a radar.


SLID

The two issues I have found in the literature are:
1. Single band IR sensors have trouble separating targets from the background against ground clutter, especially solar reflections which appear as targets heated to the temperature of the sun. Unlike radar there is no effective mathematical model for predicting infrared clutter and the performance of clutter suppressing algorithms depends entirely on the specific algorithm used.
2. Ambient heating can reduce the performance of IR sensors in hot climates. According to Israeli scientists armoured vehicles exteriors are routinely heated to 50 or 60 degrees Celsius by the sun, and this negatively impacts the performance of IR warning sensors attached to the vehicle.

The general consensus is that multi-band sensors that can exploit spectral contrast between the signatures of interest and clutter will perform best. Two-colour MWIR sensors that exploit the CO2 absorption band are particularly good at suppressing solar reflections. IRL there has been considerable interest in ultra-narrowband sensors that exploit emission lines specific to certain phenomenon of interest, such as chemicals found in some propellant charges. This would be a bit problematic on a general purpose IRST though.

Currently there are a number of warning systems which incorporate SWIR and LWIR or MWIR. SWIR is particularly useful for detecting plumes and muzzle flashes.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Zeinbrad
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29535
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeinbrad » Mon May 18, 2015 3:18 pm

So me and a friend are making an RP about a Soviet invasion of the US (during a Cold War gone hot scenario) and I just written up the Soviets naval ORBAT, thoughts?

Admiral Gorshkov Task Force
Commander-Admiral Vladimir Kasatonov
One Kiev-Class Aircraft Carrier-Admiral Gorshkov.
One Kirov-Class Battlecruiser-Admiral Ushakov.
Two Kresta II-Class Cruisers (anti-submarine)-Kronstadt and Admiral Isakov.
Five Udaloy-Class Destroyers (anti-submarine)-Vice-Admiral Kulakov, Marshal Shaposhnikov, Admiral Levchenko, Admiral Vinogradov, Admiral Panteleyev,
Seven Krivank-Class Frigates,
Ten Grisha-Class Corvettes-

Kiev Task Force.
Commander-Admiral Vladimir Alexeyev.
One Kiev-Class Aircraft Carrier-Kiev.
Two Kresta II-Class Cruisers-Admiral Markov, Marshall Khabarovsk.
Five Udaloy-Class Destroyers-Severmonsk, Admiral Tributs, Admiral Zakharov, Udaloy, Admiral Kharlamov.
Seven Krivank-Class Frigates-
Ten Grisha-Class Corvettes.

Submarines
Echo Class Submarine-Cruise Missile
Tango-Class-Conventional attack.
Oscar-Class-Cruise Missile.
K-1 Echo Class Submarine-
K-131 Echo Class Submarine-
B-515 Tango-Class.
K-266 "Orel" Oscar-Class.
K-141 "Kursk" Oscar Class.
“There are three ways to ultimate success:
The first way is to be kind.
The second way is to be kind.
The third way is to be kind.”
― Fred Rogers
Currently looking for an artist for a Star Wars fan comic I want to make.

User avatar
Rupudska
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20698
Founded: Sep 16, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Rupudska » Mon May 18, 2015 3:21 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Bumfrakistan wrote:we have the economy of 1945 Japan.


Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.


He said 1945 Japan. What economy?
The Holy Roman Empire of Karlsland (MT/FanT & FT/FanT)
THE Strike Witches NationState | Retired King of P2TM
Best thread ever.
MT Factbook/FT Factbook|Embassy|Q&A
On Karlsland Witch Doctrine:
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties

Questers wrote:
Rupudska wrote:So do you fight with AK-47s or something even more primitive? Since I doubt any economy could reasonably sustain itself that way.
Presumably they use advanced technology like STRIKE WITCHES

User avatar
Bumfrakistan
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Aug 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bumfrakistan » Mon May 18, 2015 3:22 pm

Velkanika wrote:
Bumfrakistan wrote:we have the economy of 1945 Japan.


Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.

http://ww2-weapons.com/History/Production/Japan/

User avatar
Licana
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16276
Founded: Jul 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Licana » Mon May 18, 2015 3:29 pm

Bumfrakistan wrote:
Velkanika wrote:
Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.

http://ww2-weapons.com/History/Production/Japan/


Yeah, that's a pretty shit economy there.
>American education
[19:21] <Lubyak> I want to go and wank all over him.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.

Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.

Husseinarti wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Do lets. I really want to hear another explanation about dirty vaginas keeping women out of combat, despite the vagina being a self-cleaning organ.

So was the M-16.

Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

User avatar
Velkanika
Minister
 
Posts: 2697
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Velkanika » Mon May 18, 2015 3:33 pm

Bumfrakistan wrote:
Velkanika wrote:
Well, at least you admit your economy sucks.

http://ww2-weapons.com/History/Production/Japan/

Yea, those figures are absolutely awful. Raw materials alone sums this up perfectly:

Annual strategic raw material production (m. metric tons)1939194019411942194319441945
Coal???61.360.551.711.0
Ore???7.46.76.00.9
Steel???8.08.86.50.8
Aluminium (in 1,000 metric tons - especially important for aircraft production)???1031411107
The necessity of a navy, in the restricted sense of the word, springs, therefore, from the existence of a peaceful shipping, and disappears with it, except in the case of a nation which has aggressive tendencies, and keeps up a navy merely as a branch of the military establishment. 1
1Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, 12th ed. (Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1890), 26.

Please avoid conflating my in-character role playing with what I actually believe, as these are usually quite different things.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Mon May 18, 2015 3:44 pm

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Can a modern anti-materiel rifle destroy a transport helicopter in flight?


Very unlikely unless the helicopter is hovering or flying very slowly.

A hit to a vital component will bring it down. But it would probably take a couple hundred or a couple thousand rounds to guarantee a hit to a vital component, on average. Not a problem if you have a quad AAA mount of 20mm autocannons, but a big problem if you have a semi-automatic rifle with a 5-10 round magazine and no anti-aircraft tripod.

Small arms fire is a threat to helicopters in aggregate, a lot of guys on the ground with a lot of guns, but not in isolation.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Khantin, Majestic-12 [Bot], Qelt Company, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads