Advertisement
by The Corparation » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:21 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Yytuskia » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:23 pm
The Corparation wrote:For your copy paste of a C-130, why did you tweak the dimensions and weights slightly?
by The Corparation » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:30 pm
Yytuskia wrote:The Corparation wrote:For your copy paste of a C-130, why did you tweak the dimensions and weights slightly?
Actually, I cannot do lineart for the life of me, and I do need a heavy transport plane, so I thought I might as well look for a real life model, and work form there... The Dimension tweaking comes from the other based plane, the Messerschmitt Me-323.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:05 am
Yytuskia wrote:Finished it!Classification: Messerschmitt Me-3230-G5
Type: Heavy Transport Aircraft
Crew (List): 5 (Two pilots, navigator, flight engineer and loadmaster)
Price:
Image: Schematics
(Image)
Image: Concept Art
(Image)General Information
Details Description Length 28.2 meters long Wingspan 55.2 meters long Height 10.15 meters high Propulsion Four (4x) Porsche Gnome-Radion 14n/789-AE turboprops, rated at 4,590 shp (3,430 kW) each Total Net Thrust 18,360 shp (13,720 kW)
Empty Weight 27,330 kilograms Maximum Takeoff Weight 73,400 kilograms Minimum Fuel Weight 13,850 kilograms Maximum Fuel Weight 19,390 kilograms Armament
Details Description Gunnery 1x free-mounted 14.5x114mm MG-67H HMG in remote-controlled bubble Number of Plyons Four (4x) pylons, with four (4x) mounted underwing, with two (2x) on each wing Pylon-Mounted Weaponry N/A Other Mounts Four (4×) 2,270 litre Gefüllte Kuh drop tanks for increased range/loitering time. Cargo Hold Size 12.31 meters long, by 3.12 meters wide, by 2.74 meters high Capacity • 92 passengers or
• 64 Fallschirmjägers or
• 74 litter patients with 5 medical crew or
• 6 pallets or
• 2–3 Kubelwagens II’s or
• 2 Pz.kpfw III-L’s
Normal Combat Weight 73,400 kilograms Economics
Details Description Thrust-to-Weight Ration 2.75/1 Combat Range 3,800 kilometers Ferry Range 4,200 kilometers Operational Altitude Ceiling 33,000 feet Cruising Speed 540 kilometers per hour
Maximum Speed 592 kilometers per hour Avionics
Details Description Heads-Up-Display MARKHAL™ Virtual Intelligence Heads-Up Display Mk IV for improved flying support Computers MARKHAL™ E25D Computing Systems for use of operating remote-controlled MG-67H
Ask any questions if you got them!
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Organized States » Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:08 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Yytuskia wrote:Finished it!Classification: Messerschmitt Me-3230-G5
Type: Heavy Transport Aircraft
Crew (List): 5 (Two pilots, navigator, flight engineer and loadmaster)
Price:
Image: Schematics
(Image)
Image: Concept Art
(Image)General Information
Details Description Length 28.2 meters long Wingspan 55.2 meters long Height 10.15 meters high Propulsion Four (4x) Porsche Gnome-Radion 14n/789-AE turboprops, rated at 4,590 shp (3,430 kW) each Total Net Thrust 18,360 shp (13,720 kW)
Empty Weight 27,330 kilograms Maximum Takeoff Weight 73,400 kilograms Minimum Fuel Weight 13,850 kilograms Maximum Fuel Weight 19,390 kilograms Armament
Details Description Gunnery 1x free-mounted 14.5x114mm MG-67H HMG in remote-controlled bubble Number of Plyons Four (4x) pylons, with four (4x) mounted underwing, with two (2x) on each wing Pylon-Mounted Weaponry N/A Other Mounts Four (4×) 2,270 litre Gefüllte Kuh drop tanks for increased range/loitering time. Cargo Hold Size 12.31 meters long, by 3.12 meters wide, by 2.74 meters high Capacity • 92 passengers or
• 64 Fallschirmjägers or
• 74 litter patients with 5 medical crew or
• 6 pallets or
• 2–3 Kubelwagens II’s or
• 2 Pz.kpfw III-L’s
Normal Combat Weight 73,400 kilograms Economics
Details Description Thrust-to-Weight Ration 2.75/1 Combat Range 3,800 kilometers Ferry Range 4,200 kilometers Operational Altitude Ceiling 33,000 feet Cruising Speed 540 kilometers per hour
Maximum Speed 592 kilometers per hour Avionics
Details Description Heads-Up-Display MARKHAL™ Virtual Intelligence Heads-Up Display Mk IV for improved flying support Computers MARKHAL™ E25D Computing Systems for use of operating remote-controlled MG-67H
Ask any questions if you got them!
I'd hesitate to consider a C-130 a "heavy" transport aircraft.
by Lemanrussland » Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:16 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:24 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Vitaphone Racing » Wed Aug 20, 2014 5:55 am
Lemanrussland wrote:Okay, I've done a little bit of research on the employment of the F-111 and the F-15E in the 1st Gulf War, and found that they would normally fly in with EF-111 Ravens with terrain following radars to penetrate enemy airspace and conduct deep attacks early on, on airfields and such.
What if you try that against a competent opponent with an actual airforce? You're flying in low with your EW/ECM and strike aircraft, and then they scramble fighters to intercept you. How are you supposed to defend yourself? Evade? Try to fight back with whatever fighter-like capability you have?
You guys also pointed out the danger of infrared/non-radar guided SAMs and guns ("lolpantsir camping"). How do you counter that?
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Huda » Wed Aug 20, 2014 7:46 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:Okay, I've done a little bit of research on the employment of the F-111 and the F-15E in the 1st Gulf War, and found that they would normally fly in with EF-111 Ravens with terrain following radars to penetrate enemy airspace and conduct deep attacks early on, on airfields and such.
What if you try that against a competent opponent with an actual airforce? You're flying in low with your EW/ECM and strike aircraft, and then they scramble fighters to intercept you. How are you supposed to defend yourself? Evade? Try to fight back with whatever fighter-like capability you have?
You guys also pointed out the danger of infrared/non-radar guided SAMs and guns ("lolpantsir camping"). How do you counter that?
You'd do the same thing, with more losses. The reason for low flying is to make radar detection harder, so you're operating with a minimal risk of interception in the first place.
by Lemanrussland » Wed Aug 20, 2014 7:58 am
by Vitaphone Racing » Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:00 am
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Padnak » Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:14 am
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by New Vihenia » Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:49 am
Lemanrussland wrote:What if you try that against a competent opponent with an actual airforce? You're flying in low with your EW/ECM and strike aircraft, and then they scramble fighters to intercept you. How are you supposed to defend yourself? Evade? Try to fight back with whatever fighter-like capability you have?
You guys also pointed out the danger of infrared/non-radar guided SAMs and guns ("lolpantsir camping"). How do you counter that?
by Lithuania-Latvia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:25 am
by Bratislavskaya » Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:30 am
Lithuania-Latvia wrote:The LDF Air Division is equipped with these
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=lithuania-latvia/detail=factbook/id=278780
And can you tell me how good each one is? If you can it would be greatly appreciated
by Lithuania-Latvia » Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:37 am
Bratislavskaya wrote:Lithuania-Latvia wrote:The LDF Air Division is equipped with these
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=lithuania-latvia/detail=factbook/id=278780
And can you tell me how good each one is? If you can it would be greatly appreciated
Too many ground attack aircraft types. One or two types is usually all you need.
by United Marxist Nations » Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:05 am
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Crookfur » Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:18 pm
Lithuania-Latvia wrote:The LDF Air Division is equipped with these
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=lithuania-latvia/detail=factbook/id=278780
And can you tell me how good each one is? If you can it would be greatly appreciated
by Organized States » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:23 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Already posted this in the realism thread, but I figured you guys would know more about it:
Since I decided my ground forces and naval forces will be Soviet/Russian (or based on them, in the case of my carrier), should I do the same for my airforce? The competing ideas I have are for:
~370 Eurofighter Typhoon
~720 MiG-29
~650 MiG-29M
~480 MiG-35
~500 Su-30MKI
by Greater Weselton » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:24 pm
by United Marxist Nations » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:24 pm
Organized States wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:Already posted this in the realism thread, but I figured you guys would know more about it:
Since I decided my ground forces and naval forces will be Soviet/Russian (or based on them, in the case of my carrier), should I do the same for my airforce? The competing ideas I have are for:
~370 Eurofighter Typhoon
~720 MiG-29
~650 MiG-29M
~480 MiG-35
~500 Su-30MKI
Maybe a mixed fleet of MiG-29M, Su-30MKIs, and the MiG-35?
The Eurofighter seems odd, especially if you're more-Eastern aligned.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Lydenburg » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:27 pm
by Organized States » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:28 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Antigue, Disstrackia
Advertisement