The original Abrams? Eh... maybe
But the A1 is so far ahead of everybody. T-80 is a soviet design, really, the Merkava could even handle the T-80, actually quite easily.
Advertisement
by Roski » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:25 am
by Questers » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:25 am
If you want to play competitively none of the special decks are really worth it.Riysa wrote:Questers wrote:super E is a piece of shit. it's the worst NATO atgm carrier, probably. it was ok before the atgm carrier buff though.
Meh, its cheap and disposable.
Are you a more armored guy, or infantry?
Also, Merkaaaavaaaa
Personally, I don't really view it as exceptional. The early models weren't the best, and the Mark 4 is...eh, I don't know, but it feels like its tring to be a notAbrams.
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:26 am
Registug wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:I tried drawing a tank. Tracks courtesy of RisenBritannia. Thoughts?
Its pretty good. I can't draw.
Your guns seem a little small (AA mount and main gun) and it would probably serve you to know that RB draws in a scale of 1cm : 1 pixel
DID SOMEONE MENTION SENTINEL TANKS?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Roski » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:26 am
by Riysa » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:26 am
Questers wrote:If you want to play competitively none of the special decks are really worth it.Riysa wrote:
Meh, its cheap and disposable.
Are you a more armored guy, or infantry?
Also, Merkaaaavaaaa
Personally, I don't really view it as exceptional. The early models weren't the best, and the Mark 4 is...eh, I don't know, but it feels like its tring to be a notAbrams.
The Super E has an accuracy of 8 IIRC which is a 40% hit rate. Each accuracy point resembles 5% CTH. 40% is just too low to rely on.
by Dostanuot Loj » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:27 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:This poses more questions than it solves. What exactly is a hyperbar box?
by Registug » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:28 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Registug wrote:Its pretty good. I can't draw.
Your guns seem a little small (AA mount and main gun) and it would probably serve you to know that RB draws in a scale of 1cm : 1 pixel
DID SOMEONE MENTION SENTINEL TANKS?
Yeah, the suspension is RB's Sentinel wheel pairs.
Only there are four instead of three.
by Premislyd » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:30 am
Pimps Inc wrote:Swastikas are not allowed in nationstates unless your are RPing as Nazi Germany or sumthing
by Roski » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:30 am
Riysa wrote:Roski wrote:
The original Abrams? Eh... maybe
But the A1 is so far ahead of everybody. T-80 is a soviet design, really, the Merkava could even handle the T-80, actually quite easily.
I feel like this post is implying the reason why the Abrams would win is because the T-80U is Soviet/Russian.
by Registug » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:31 am
Purpelia wrote:The T-55 was developed from the T-34. Kind of. Sort of. At a great distance and with a lot of vodka obscuring the view.
What would happen if I applied the same process to the Comet?
by The New Lowlands » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:32 am
Registug wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:I tried drawing a tank. Tracks courtesy of RisenBritannia. Thoughts?
Its pretty good. I can't draw.
Your guns seem a little small (AA mount and main gun) and it would probably serve you to know that RB draws in a scale of 1cm : 1 pixel
DID SOMEONE MENTION SENTINEL TANKS?
by Questers » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:32 am
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:33 am
Roski wrote:Riysa wrote:
I feel like this post is implying the reason why the Abrams would win is because the T-80U is Soviet/Russian.
Nope. Because the T-90 is actually a pretty good tank. 1
But so far, the Merkava can handle a lot of Soviet/Russian and Chinese tanks. If not all of them. 2
If the Abrams is better, and it should be, then it will be superior to the T-80 3
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Purpelia » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:33 am
Registug wrote:Purpelia wrote:The T-55 was developed from the T-34. Kind of. Sort of. At a great distance and with a lot of vodka obscuring the view.
What would happen if I applied the same process to the Comet?
Centurion happens is what happens.
They might not have taken a comet chassis and turned it into the Centurion, but they did take all the design ideas from the comet and the churchill and maybe even a bit from other tanks and that's how they accomplished the universal tank.
by Mizrad » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:33 am
by Registug » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:34 am
Roski wrote:Riysa wrote:
I feel like this post is implying the reason why the Abrams would win is because the T-80U is Soviet/Russian.
Nope. Because the T-90 is actually a pretty good tank.
But so far, the Merkava can handle a lot of Soviet/Russian and Chinese tanks. If not all of them.
If the Abrams is better, and it should be, then it will be superior to the T-80
by Istevia » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:36 am
Roski wrote:Riysa wrote:
I feel like this post is implying the reason why the Abrams would win is because the T-80U is Soviet/Russian.
Nope. Because the T-90 is actually a pretty good tank.
But so far, the Merkava can handle a lot of Soviet/Russian and Chinese tanks. If not all of them.
If the Abrams is better, and it should be, then it will be superior to the T-80
by Riysa » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:37 am
Roski wrote:Riysa wrote:
I feel like this post is implying the reason why the Abrams would win is because the T-80U is Soviet/Russian.
Nope. Because the T-90 is actually a pretty good tank.
But so far, the Merkava can handle a lot of Soviet/Russian and Chinese tanks. If not all of them.
If the Abrams is better, and it should be, then it will be superior to the T-80
Mizrad wrote:Roski wrote:
The original Abrams? Eh... maybe
But the A1 is so far ahead of everybody. T-80 is a soviet design, really, the Merkava could even handle the T-80, actually quite easily.
I was going for the original model, as I'm in another thread that's died but I wanted closure because no matter what I say to a certain somebody, the T-80U is still apparently god of all tanks.
On another note, the A1/A2 would have an issue against the Challenger 2, the Leopard 2A5 through 7, the Leclerc and most other first world nation MBT's. Then again, all of those nations are allied and most of the tanks are based off of each other or share parts so that doesn't come as a surprise to me. However I do have another question, is the T-90 really all it's cracked up to be? Because from what I and multiple others have seen is that it's really just another T-72 almost. Your thoughts everyone?
by The Republic of Lanos » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:38 am
by Dostanuot Loj » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:39 am
Questers wrote:the reason the Russians gave the T-80 series up was not because the T-80U was worse than the T-90 (they preferred it apparently, even with the engine) but because the T-80 production lines were all based in a foreign country.
by Roski » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:40 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Roski wrote:
Nope. Because the T-90 is actually a pretty good tank. 1
But so far, the Merkava can handle a lot of Soviet/Russian and Chinese tanks. If not all of them. 2
If the Abrams is better, and it should be, then it will be superior to the T-80 3
1) based on what
2) based on what
3) based on what
by Registug » Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:41 am
Purpelia wrote:Registug wrote:Centurion happens is what happens.
They might not have taken a comet chassis and turned it into the Centurion, but they did take all the design ideas from the comet and the churchill and maybe even a bit from other tanks and that's how they accomplished the universal tank.
That's what I thought.
What if instead of the Comet I was to take the Panzer IV?
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: HarYan
Advertisement