What is the main military weapon of your country?

[Genivar]

http://i38.tinypic.com/e9ztlk.jpg
XM8 assault rifle.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Poster.jpg
With modifications.

[Indeos]

What have I done?
Here it is, especially for the 10th Shock Regiment Of The Wolohanistani People's Liberation Army, the WMA Mk.1 Shock Trooper Assualt/Battle Shotgun. Or simply the STABS.


Thoughts?

Keep in mind this was made for a bunch of loonies I posted earlier.

If you're batshit insane enough, make a combination rifle (shotgun barrel that fires 10 gauge shells/slugs, and a rifle barrel that fires .700 NE rounds mounted under that).

Like so?

Where does the other barrel feed from? *EDIT* Never mind.

[Mikedor]

PT Gatling Gun. Stats- no idea.

Code: Select all

<weapon>
  <part id="Shape01" x="787" y="143.5" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ffffff"/>
  <part id="UReceiver017" x="886" y="160.5" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape12" x="1021" y="348.45" rotation="0" scale="9.48055572839104" flip="1,1" colors="9c5e37"/>
  <part id="RMag015" x="854.95" y="330.95" rotation="-156.94720400313975" scale="2.561858944804793" flip="1,-1" colors="b68157"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="915" y="184.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886871337890625" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="880" y="184.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886871337890625" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="826" y="183.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886873869835033" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Bolt010B" x="856.05" y="258" rotation="0" scale="0.8" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666,666666"/>
  <group x="1036.5" y="185" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-0.5" y="20.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="0.5" y="8.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-1.5" y="-21" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-1.5" y="-11" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="1.5" y="1.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  </group>
  <part id="RMag015" x="850.95" y="329.95" rotation="23.096350211769646" scale="2.537398972300859" flip="-1,1" colors="666666"/>
  <part id="RMag009" x="850.05" y="109.95" rotation="0" scale="1.2203769701953333" flip="1,-1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <group x="1095" y="255.95" rotation="0" scale="0.7889368857509657" flip="1,1">
    <part id="Handguard009A" x="18.7" y="-31.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard009D" x="-68.1" y="24.75" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,e1e1e1"/>
    <part id="Handguard009B" x="1.65" y="-22" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard009C" x="-97.75" y="-22.4" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
  </group>
  <part id="Bolt011" x="890.05" y="221" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="ISight023" x="940.05" y="147.7" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
</weapon>

[Thurask]

Like so?

Attach a bayonet under the rifle barrel and you're done.

[Wolohanistan]

PT Gatling Gun. Stats- no idea.

Code: Select all

<weapon>
  <part id="Shape01" x="787" y="143.5" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ffffff"/>
  <part id="UReceiver017" x="886" y="160.5" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape12" x="1021" y="348.45" rotation="0" scale="9.48055572839104" flip="1,1" colors="9c5e37"/>
  <part id="RMag015" x="854.95" y="330.95" rotation="-156.94720400313975" scale="2.561858944804793" flip="1,-1" colors="b68157"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="915" y="184.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886871337890625" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="880" y="184.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886871337890625" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Shape01" x="826" y="183.45" rotation="0" scale="1.886873869835033" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="Bolt010B" x="856.05" y="258" rotation="0" scale="0.8" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666,666666"/>
  <group x="1036.5" y="185" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-0.5" y="20.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="0.5" y="8.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-1.5" y="-21" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="-1.5" y="-11" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
    <part id="Barrel011" x="1.5" y="1.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  </group>
  <part id="RMag015" x="850.95" y="329.95" rotation="23.096350211769646" scale="2.537398972300859" flip="-1,1" colors="666666"/>
  <part id="RMag009" x="850.05" y="109.95" rotation="0" scale="1.2203769701953333" flip="1,-1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <group x="1095" y="255.95" rotation="0" scale="0.7889368857509657" flip="1,1">
    <part id="Handguard009A" x="18.7" y="-31.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard009D" x="-68.1" y="24.75" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,e1e1e1"/>
    <part id="Handguard009B" x="1.65" y="-22" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard009C" x="-97.75" y="-22.4" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b,666666"/>
  </group>
  <part id="Bolt011" x="890.05" y="221" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
  <part id="ISight023" x="940.05" y="147.7" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="ac9c7b"/>
</weapon>

I honestly really like this, from the limited parts provided it looks pretty damn good.

[Mikedor]

Yeah, distinct lack of wheels in PMG

[The Corparation]

Bulllpup SMG


Bullpup Assault Rifle

[Gwarmos]

What have I done?
Here it is, especially for the 10th Shock Regiment Of The Wolohanistani People's Liberation Army, the WMA Mk.1 Shock Trooper Assualt/Battle Shotgun. Or simply the STABS.


Thoughts?

Keep in mind this was made for a bunch of loonies I posted earlier.

Good to see someone else rocking the 10g. Might wanna reinforce with a spine and thicken the barrel walls to handle the stress of the shell though, even more so given the short barrel length(for a shottie). But that would just make it aesthetically more pleasing.

Other than that, great gun. The only thing I really not a fan of is the look of the stock and pistol grip. More of a stock&grip carbine person myself.

[Indeos]

What have I done?
Here it is, especially for the 10th Shock Regiment Of The Wolohanistani People's Liberation Army, the WMA Mk.1 Shock Trooper Assualt/Battle Shotgun. Or simply the STABS.


Thoughts?

Keep in mind this was made for a bunch of loonies I posted earlier.

Good to see someone else rocking the 10g. Might wanna reinforce with a spine and thicken the barrel walls to handle the stress of the shell though, even more so given the short barrel length(for a shottie). But that would just make it aesthetically more pleasing.

Other than that, great gun. The only thing I really not a fan of is the look of the stock and pistol grip. More of a stock&grip carbine person myself.

Maybe thicken the bayonet a little too, it looks like it would snap, IMO.

[Wolohanistan]

What have I done?
Here it is, especially for the 10th Shock Regiment Of The Wolohanistani People's Liberation Army, the WMA Mk.1 Shock Trooper Assualt/Battle Shotgun. Or simply the STABS.


Thoughts?

Keep in mind this was made for a bunch of loonies I posted earlier.

Good to see someone else rocking the 10g. Might wanna reinforce with a spine and thicken the barrel walls to handle the stress of the shell though, even more so given the short barrel length(for a shottie). But that would just make it aesthetically more pleasing.

Other than that, great gun. The only thing I really not a fan of is the look of the stock and pistol grip. More of a stock&grip carbine person myself.

Maybe thicken the bayonet a little too, it looks like it would snap, IMO.

It's a triangular blade, for inflicting nasty wounds.It's thicker at the top but that's not too easy to represent in 2d.

Also, with shot it has an effictive rnage of 40 metres. Can't beleive I let that one slip by.

[Hegstoria]

What do you guys think? This is my second bullpup design. I'm pretty sure I gave my other one to someone.

[Dimoniquid]

What do you guys think? This is my second bullpup design. I'm pretty sure I gave my other one to someone.

I've a slight hurt on the magazine - it looks like it'll fall out. Put the well down a little.

[Hegstoria]

What do you guys think? This is my second bullpup design. I'm pretty sure I gave my other one to someone.

I've a slight hurt on the magazine - it looks like it'll fall out. Put the well down a little.

Better?

[Dimoniquid]

What do you guys think? This is my second bullpup design. I'm pretty sure I gave my other one to someone.

I've a slight hurt on the magazine - it looks like it'll fall out. Put the well down a little.

Better?

I'd guess so.

[Trellisk]

The Protectorate of Trellisk has introduced a new underslung equipment system:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4119/4768362565_e5c0ecb6c2_b.jpg
Top to bottom:
Short Grenade launcher
Long Grenade launcher
Internal Magazine loaded Shotgun
Box Magazine loaded Shotgun
Short Elephant/Flare Gun
Long Elephant/Flare Gun
Caseless Metal storm volley gun
Side arm (full and semi auto)
Assault rifle
Grapple gun
Flamethrower
Rocket tube
Buzz saw
RPG launcher

[Phonencia]

The CP-34!
made from scratch.

Code: Select all

<weapon>
  <group x="849.6" y="566.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
    <part id="RMag011" x="-171.6" y="26.05" rotation="0" scale="1.1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="Bolt001" x="-9.6" y="-55.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="Barrel012" x="82.35" y="-56.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="FStock08" x="-175.6" y="-21.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666,666666"/>
    <part id="DustCover02" x="-166.6" y="-46.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,cccccc,999999"/>
    <part id="LReceiver018B" x="-168.6" y="-11.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard019Down" x="38.9" y="-39.3" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="LReceiver012" x="-23.6" y="8.05" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666,666666"/>
    <part id="Handguard019Up" x="46.4" y="-52.25" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="UReceiver003" x="-10.6" y="-53.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666,666666"/>
    <part id="DeltaRing01" x="-81.6" y="-50.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="Bolt011B" x="47.35" y="-44.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,-1" colors="666666"/>
    <part id="Compensator003" x="247.4" y="-56.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    <group x="112.35" y="-48.9" rotation="0" scale="0.93" flip="1,1">
      <part id="RCover03S" x="-0.05" y="-0.6" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="RCover03B" x="0" y="22.8" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="RCover03T" x="0" y="-22.8" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    </group>
    <group x="-56.6" y="-75.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
      <part id="ISight007B" x="-5.7" y="0.1" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
      <part id="ISight007A" x="9.65" y="0" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
    </group>
    <group x="143.35" y="-76.9" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
      <part id="ISight008B" x="-6.65" y="-1.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="ISight008A" x="9.45" y="0.55" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
    </group>
  </group>
</weapon>

Criticism?

[LINTYLAND]

What do you guys think? This is my second bullpup design. I'm pretty sure I gave my other one to someone.

I've a slight hurt on the magazine - it looks like it'll fall out. Put the well down a little.

Better?

I'd guess so.

Might need a grip

[Amerikians]

The wood is is more of a symbol of the effectiveness of the first Sturmgewehr, though the wood is made to be very sturdy, and it makes production a lot more effective, enabling the rest of the Military equipment to be built more efficiently.

Agreed, it does give it a throw back look, but wood is outdated. Surely a modern Sturmgewehr deserves the best of its time, just as the original was built to the best standards of its time. But that's just my opinion. Aside from that I like the gun a lot, the barrel and receiver flow together really well.

Why is wood outdated? Composites are only marginally lighter and steel is heavier.

The Sturmgewehr was not built to the best standards of its time.

Wood is outdated because arm-chair designers and CoD-fanboys alike love 'tacticool'. < My opinion.

[Indeos]

The wood is is more of a symbol of the effectiveness of the first Sturmgewehr, though the wood is made to be very sturdy, and it makes production a lot more effective, enabling the rest of the Military equipment to be built more efficiently.

Agreed, it does give it a throw back look, but wood is outdated. Surely a modern Sturmgewehr deserves the best of its time, just as the original was built to the best standards of its time. But that's just my opinion. Aside from that I like the gun a lot, the barrel and receiver flow together really well.

Why is wood outdated? Composites are only marginally lighter and steel is heavier.

The Sturmgewehr was not built to the best standards of its time.

Wood is outdated because arm-chair designers and CoD-fanboys alike love 'tacticool'. < My opinion.

And because it breaks easier, I would think. Plus, it's cheaper.

[Gwarmos]

Actually, if the stock is built right with the grain it'd most likely have a higher resistance to breaking than a polymer would because of the grain and the latter's lack there of. The only thing I can see is it's flammable, but some lacquer and polish will strongly deter if not stop that, and plastics effin melt with the same heat.

[Indeos]

Actually, if the stock is built right with the grain it'd most likely have a higher resistance to breaking than a polymer would because of the grain and the latter's lack there of. The only thing I can see is it's flammable, but some lacquer and polish will strongly deter if not stop that, and plastics effin melt with the same heat.

Oh, okay. Well, it's still cheaper to use polymers, right?

[Gwarmos]

Actually, if the stock is built right with the grain it'd most likely have a higher resistance to breaking than a polymer would because of the grain and the latter's lack there of. The only thing I can see is it's flammable, but some lacquer and polish will strongly deter if not stop that, and plastics effin melt with the same heat.

Oh, okay. Well, it's still cheaper to use polymers, right?

Depends on the quality of the wood and the quality of the polymer. High grade wood for stocks is pricey, and takes some time and effort($ on the factory line) to shape and affix to gun, while high grade polymers are expensive to create and somewhat complicated and time consuming affair compared to their wood counterparts. So, average grade wood stocks and average grade polymer stocks are about the same, but low beats high for both if you catch my drift.

[Dimoniquid]

A pistol I made...

Code: Select all

<weapon>
  <group x="919.9" y="684.75" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
    <part id="Shape06" x="-95.65" y="64.5" rotation="-60.17481249140826" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="cccccc"/>
    <group x="29.5" y="-50.95" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1">
      <part id="ISight010" x="70.7" y="-57" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape04" x="-40.25" y="-48.8" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Flashlight03" x="68.2" y="-34" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
      <part id="LReceiver014" x="-43" y="21.2" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666,666666"/>
      <part id="LReceiver018B" x="51.8" y="-17.5" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666,666666"/>
      <part id="Barrel025" x="51.6" y="-55" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape04" x="37.35" y="-48.65" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape04" x="0.2" y="-62.25" rotation="0" scale="0.25" flip="1,1" colors="cccccc"/>
      <part id="Shape06" x="-69.4" y="-59.5" rotation="0" scale="0.4" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape06" x="-31.85" y="-46.25" rotation="0" scale="0.399993896484375" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape06" x="6.95" y="-46.35" rotation="0" scale="0.399993896484375" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
      <part id="Shape06" x="46.85" y="-57.25" rotation="0" scale="0.399993896484375" flip="1,1" colors="666666"/>
    </group>
    <group x="-126.85" y="114.65" rotation="28.4351285882897" scale="1" flip="1,1">
      <part id="Ammo45ACPB" x="9.15" y="0.05" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors=""/>
      <part id="Ammo45ACPS" x="-4.4" y="0" rotation="0" scale="1" flip="1,1" colors=""/>
    </group>
  </group>
</weapon>

[Dass Neue Reich]

The wood is is more of a symbol of the effectiveness of the first Sturmgewehr, though the wood is made to be very sturdy, and it makes production a lot more effective, enabling the rest of the Military equipment to be built more efficiently.

Agreed, it does give it a throw back look, but wood is outdated. Surely a modern Sturmgewehr deserves the best of its time, just as the original was built to the best standards of its time. But that's just my opinion. Aside from that I like the gun a lot, the barrel and receiver flow together really well.

Why is wood outdated? Composites are only marginally lighter and steel is heavier.

The Sturmgewehr was not built to the best standards of its time.

Who said anything about steel? Either way that small difference in weight is a benefit, and why wouldn't you want that. Last i recall it is the goal of weapons designers to make lighter weapon for the soldiers sake. Plus with composite stocks you can create collapsible, folding, adjustable other such variants that would just be awkward with wood. When on the topic of the Sturmgewehr, yes it was not the highest quality of it's time, but was the only Rifle of its kind at that time. Thus the StGw was and is on a level of its own as it pioneered the future of the Assault Rifle. It may very well have been the best rifle of the war. Think about it, it fires the 8mm Mouser, holds up to 30 rounds and has automatic firing capabilities. It bridged the gab between Rifle and SMG. Holding that fire power and ability sets any StGw operator up for success on the battle field. The only other nation during the war to give their soldiers a semi-auto weapon was The United States, and the M1 Garand only held 8 rounds at that...on top of that when the M1 ejected its magazine it made that notorious brass sound that gave away the operators position. Further more the two guns are separated a world apart by the STG's ability to fire automatically. About the only advantage the M1 has over the STG is its rotating bolt, while the STG only had a tilting bolt.

[Sharfghotten]

Sturmgewehr, yes it was not the highest quality of it's time, but was the only Rifle of its kind at that time. Thus the StGw was and is on a level of its own as it pioneered the future of the Assault Rifle. It may very well have been the best rifle of the war. Think about it, it fires the 8mm Mouser, holds up to 30 rounds and has automatic firing capabilities. It bridged the gab between Rifle and SMG. Holding that fire power and ability sets any StGw operator up for success on the battle field. The only other nation during the war to give their soldiers a semi-auto weapon was The United States, and the M1 Garand only held 8 rounds at that...on top of that when the M1 ejected its magazine it made that notorious brass sound that gave away the operators position. Further more the two guns are separated a world apart by the STG's ability to fire automatically. About the only advantage the M1 has over the STG is its rotating bolt, while the STG only had a tilting bolt.

Erm... SVT-40, Gewher 43, Ag m/42 were all semi-automatic.

The korovin-1945 was also fully automatic, designed in 1945.